Dear god, that thing shows so much blatant disregard for things stated in the manuals it's not even funny. You know why A Link to the Past has it's name? Because it takes place in the "past", ie before the two other games that had been released at the time, Legend of Zelda and Adventure of Link. It's also ignoring a plethora of other plot points, like the fact that the complete triforce is kept in Hyrule Castle in the Oracle games, which means that it can't take place at a time when Ganon had his piece (as well as the ridiculous conclusion that the two Oracle games take place in different timelines - yeah, that makes sense, now explain how the game you play first is referred to in the game you play next, and makes it absolutely clear that there is just one guy having both these quests, one after the other - did he even play these games?), a lot of references to the first meetings of the different Link and Zelda (the Link in LoZ is not someone who knew Zelda and Impa already, as made pretty clear in the manual), and a lot of plot inconsistencies (Ganon died in LoZ (no, not for the first time), but apparantly he's not only alive again in LttP, he also owns the entire Triforce AND is trapped in the Golden Land again for some reason - and the only reason he gives for putting it there is that "it takes place after Four Swords Adventure because of a minor detail, yet he doesn't give any reason at all why FSA takes place after AoL).VegettoEX wrote:I typically don't link to YouTube stuff, but check out the Game Trailers awesome dissection of the Zelda chronology.
Bah, badly reseached crap that makes zero sense.