Kanzenshuu

As if the question were about whether the content was good or bad 🤦


All commercial projects exist to sell a product and make profit, whether we as an audience or critics might universally hail said project as being True Art or whathaveyou. Even when a passion project is funded by a commercial ...

As if the question were about whether the content was good or bad

I don't much see the point of bothering to brand something as 'pointless' given that it's going to exist for the rest of time anyway. If it's good, good. If it's bad, that sucks, maybe they'll do it better next time. Like, I think Dragon Ball Evolution and Fukkatsu no F are bad films, I don't go ...

Well, if they mess up the second attempt, they can try again in five years. After all, it's improving, isn't it? Personally, I'd stay in this endless cycle. In 2036, there will be children who didn't watch the series in 2026, so they'll make a new version for them.


Welcome to GeGeGe no ...

Well, if they mess up the second attempt, they can try again in five years. After all, it's improving, isn't it? Personally, I'd stay in this endless cycle. In 2036, there will be children who didn't watch the series in 2026, so they'll make a new version for them.

At that stage the future was in, I don't think it would be possible for a society to rebuild itself. However, this could be fixed by Goku taking the Dragon Balls from the present to the future and repairing Earth, as well as resurrecting the dead. It would be a closing of the loop for Trunks' story ...

The cast doesn't need to be entirely Asian. For example, the people of West City could be American actors. But I think it's a terrible idea to do the same with characters like MutenRoshi, Kuririn, Tenshinhan, Yamcha, Chi-Chi, and others who carry Asian influences in every aspect. From their names to ...

I reflected a lot on this idea and coincidentally decided to write drafts of what would be a Dragon Ball trilogy adapting all 194 chapters.

I made a 12-page draft of what would be the first film, which mixes the Dragon Ball's Hunt arc and the Red Ribbon Army arc. I'm looking for literary and ...

I follow the same principle.

This smells to me like someone trying to minimize the damage of a fabricated story to avoid the wrath of their followers.

This justification is stupid when you understand the basics of how a series is produced, especially one that's at a stage where there are rumors circulating about key scenes ...

"I'm the nephew of the president of Toei Animation, and I know they're producing a remake of Dragon Ball Super."

It's so easy to grab the attention of naive fans desperate for franchise content. Anyone who says they know something will be taken 100% seriously.

I just reiterate what I said: if it's good, preserve it; if it's bad, discard it. This isn't about a remake of Dragon Ball Super, but about Dragon Ball from now on.


The ending of the Future Trunks saga is good, though, and much better than another generic Disney Fairy-Tale ending where the ...

I think you misunderstood what I said. I was specifically talking about Toriyama's drafts, responding to your comment about something that belongs to Toriyama and cannot be changed. As I previously mentioned, there's an example of a larger plot point involving the end of the Future Trunks arc, which ...

I don't think it necessarily should be done. Is the idea good? Great, keep it. If it's bad, think of something better. I think it's very detrimental to try to build a story from scraps of paper without any sense of progression. Even in DAIMA, which reportedly involved writing more detailed drafts ...

Regarding the production timeline, I meant that they had all the conditions to deliver something consistent and well-planned. Look, they wouldn't have to do something like Dragon Ball Z or Dragon Ball Super, that they need to have 100 episodes, different arcs, and everything else.

Dragon Ball DAIMA ...

Any excitement I had about the franchise holders handling a new Dragon Ball TV series was completely exhausted with Dragon Ball DAIMA. It was a short story: only 20 episodes, with about three years of production. Still, the package gets tangled up and turns the two halves of the series into ...

It's curious that 10 years later I realized there isn't a previous panel explaining how Goten is falling off the cliff in the manga. It was the TV series footage filling in the gaps in my mind!

Also, I'm sad that the cool Soup D'Saian Gahd detail isn't in the TV series. It's quite likely that ...

Whatever they're doing now, let it be something new. Unfortunately, the Dragon Ball Super TV series paid for the corporate incompetence of its time, but that doesn't mean we should be stuck with it or that there isn't an opportunity to do better with new stories, whether through new films or a ...

With the exception of Dragon Ball Super itself, announcements related to the franchise usually happen between 8 and 12 months before the release date. That's a reasonable timeframe, considering they're working on it before the announcement.

What I think always made things difficult for Dragon Ball ...

I keep wondering if they would remake everything from scratch or if they would work from the 2015 material, only correcting some scenes, removing others and adding new ones. This makes me think about how the series' files are stored. Do they still have access to the episodes before the final ...