Super is not so bad like someone says

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Lord Beerus » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:35 pm

TekTheNinja wrote:Nope. Z used it's cast a lot better than Super. At least they all got screen time there.
Z ditched half of the original cast once the Saiyan arc ended. The jury is still out with Super.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:45 pm

DBZ completely erased Launch as a character (who was one my favourite DB characters). DBZ sucks! :roll:

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:47 pm

fadeddreams5 wrote: So again, nobody wants Goku or Vegeta to be relegated to side character roles. All people desire, whether they realize it or not, is a better structured story that doesn't overemphasize on any one or two characters.
Yes, because Beerus, Whis, Goku, Vegeta, Champa, Vados, Hit, Cabba, are only 1-2 characters. The Champa arc is only a dip in the water, and people are already whining.

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by TekTheNinja » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:54 pm

DragonHermit wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote:I don't think people want Goku stripped of his role as the main character
That's exactly what it is. People were complaining that GT didn't involve Vegeta, then Toriyama included Vegeta. Now they're complaining about Piccolo and Buu. Like wtf. Just enjoy the show. If you want to make Piccolo and Tien the main characters go write fan fiction.

The whole point of the show is to show Goku's growth from a child to a grandfather in EoZ, where he passes the torch to Uub.
False.

What we want is a better spread of character use. Let's compare it to another franchise for a second here... I'll use Star Wars. Who is the main character? Luke, clearly. But do the others do things? Yes, yes they do. It's pretty simple shit.
Yes, because Beerus, Whis, Goku, Vegeta, Champa, Vados, Hit, Cabba, are only 1-2 characters. The Champa arc is only a dip in the water, and people are already whining.
The only ones beside Goku and Vegeta there are new characters. This WOULD be fine, but this show is doing a terrible job at getting us invested in most of them. That and old beloved characters being replace by new characters has always been a huge problem with Dragon Ball.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Apr 10, 2016 7:57 pm

TekTheNinja wrote:This WOULD be fine, but this show is doing a terrible job at getting us invested in most of them.
Yeah it's not like anyone likes Beerus, Champa, Hit, Cabba, etc... If only Tien could do a SPC on Beerus and kill him, that would be awesome.

I always thought that a new series meant introducing new characters, but oh well.

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by TekTheNinja » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:03 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
TekTheNinja wrote:Nope. Z used it's cast a lot better than Super. At least they all got screen time there.
Z ditched half of the original cast once the Saiyan arc ended. The jury is still out with Super.
Not really. They still all did more than they do in super.
DBZ completely erased Launch as a character (who was one my favourite DB characters). DBZ sucks! :roll:
Well that actually WAS a problem. No one is saying Z is completely innocent.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Lord Beerus » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:10 pm

TekTheNinja wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:
TekTheNinja wrote:Nope. Z used it's cast a lot better than Super. At least they all got screen time there.
Z ditched half of the original cast once the Saiyan arc ended. The jury is still out with Super.
Not really. They still all did more than they do in super.
Roshi did nothing in Z. They at least threw him a bone and had him battle Freeza's army.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6335
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Cipher » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:13 pm

To be fair, there is a difference between Beerus et. all and previous cast members we're meant to be sympathetic to. Beerus, Whis, Champa and Vados are all obstacles more than genuine characters we're expected to cheer for and watch change. They're not the same as the rest of the cast.

And Z did do a better job at points of managing an ensemble cast. Not all the time, but there were definitely highlights like the Namek arc and the early Cell arc. Even the Boo arc did a great job of separating characters into different plots, though I'd have hated to be on the Internet the week it became clear the climax would come down to Goku, Vegeta and Mr. Satan on the Kaioshin planet.

But if there's one thing Super has made aggressively clear to me, it's that you can't have someone's favorite character not do something for a minute, and there are many times earlier material would have drawn similar complaints had the means of broadcasting them existed during its release.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15240
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Hellspawn28 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:22 pm

DragonHermit wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote:I don't think people want Goku stripped of his role as the main character
That's exactly what it is. People were complaining that GT didn't involve Vegeta, then Toriyama included Vegeta. Now they're complaining about Piccolo and Buu. Like wtf. Just enjoy the show. If you want to make Piccolo and Tien the main characters go write fan fiction.
People was even complaining that Goku and Vegeta didn't fight in the 2008 Jump Special. I remember some people here was like "Why is Goten and Trunks fighting? It should be Goku and Vegeta!". One thing I learn from DB fans is that they will want something and bitch about it when they finally get it.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5156
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by fadeddreams5 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:22 pm

DragonHermit wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote: So again, nobody wants Goku or Vegeta to be relegated to side character roles. All people desire, whether they realize it or not, is a better structured story that doesn't overemphasize on any one or two characters.
Yes, because Beerus, Whis, Goku, Vegeta, Champa, Vados, Hit, Cabba, are only 1-2 characters. The Champa arc is only a dip in the water, and people are already whining.
Besides Beerus and Whis, all those other character you mentioned are presented as obstacles for Goku and Vegeta to overcome. What has Cabba done so far? Fight Vegeta and lose. What do we know about him? He's a saiyan from Planet Salada. That's not to say Super won't make better use of them, but if it does, that goes back to what I wrote about creating a better structured story. As of now, and since Super began, there's been an overemphasis on Goku and Vegeta.

And mind you, I personally wouldn't want a saga to include EVERY DB character and give them all major roles. It's completely fine for many to not appear at all! Launch and Pilaf disappearing from DBZ was a wise decision, imo.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
IM21
Banned
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 10:45 am
Location: Hell

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by IM21 » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:31 pm

I get it that some people would like to see side characters be relevant, but c'mon lets be honest Yamcha, Tien, Chiaotzu, Goten, Trunks and even Piccolo or Gohan can't do shit anymore. Goku, Vegeta, Gods, etc. are just way overpowered. So I just don't see old characters have a lot of battle time. I do hope Gohan gets back on track tho.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:36 pm

fadeddreams5 wrote: And mind you, I personally wouldn't want a saga to include EVERY DB character and give them all major roles. It's completely fine for many to not appear at all! Launch and Pilaf disappearing from DBZ was a wise decision, imo.
If Super ended at this tournament, yes there would be a lack of structured story. But remember 24 episodes were just movie retellings, that HAD to be done to be consistent with Z, while this tournament is just the start of a new saga.

The "real Super" is just beginning. BoG and RoF were just there to make $ in theaters.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6335
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Cipher » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:43 pm

DragonHermit wrote:If Super ended at this tournament, yes there would be a lack of structured story. But remember 24 episodes were just movie retellings, that HAD to be done to be consistent with Z, while this tournament is just the start of a new saga.

The "real Super" is just beginning. BoG and RoF were just there to make $ in theaters.
I don't think that's an argument that can be made for the series, regardless of how anyone feels about it. 40 episodes is 40 episodes.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Apr 10, 2016 10:48 pm

Cipher wrote:
DragonHermit wrote:If Super ended at this tournament, yes there would be a lack of structured story. But remember 24 episodes were just movie retellings, that HAD to be done to be consistent with Z, while this tournament is just the start of a new saga.

The "real Super" is just beginning. BoG and RoF were just there to make $ in theaters.
I don't think that's an argument that can be made for the series, regardless of how anyone feels about it. 40 episodes is 40 episodes.
It's an argument for story structure not for music, animation, choreography.

The lack of a long term story structure is because most of the series has just retold movies, that were supposed to be stand alone stories.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Kuririn Fan » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:07 am

Lord Beerus wrote: Roshi did nothing in Z. They at least threw him a bone and had him battle Freeza's army.
Roshi passed the torch to new generation. His arc was complete.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by precita » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:20 am

As long as Gohan comes back as a major character, Piccolo, Goten/Trunks do SOMETHING, and the writers get some use out of 18 and Krillin, I'll be fine.

User avatar
irreality
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 931
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 3:08 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by irreality » Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:52 am

I disagree with people's perception of the utilization of characters in the show for two reasons:

1. Dragon Ball has never been an ensemble show. It is a show with a main character, and the other characters are never going to be a dominant force. They never have been. Recurring characters come and go in their importance. It isn't about saying "oh it is the Goku show" -- well, yes, it *is* the Goku show. It is only a bad thing if Goku doesn't learn from or interact with the other characters in meaningful ways -- but he does interact with others in great ways, even if they are short-lived characters. But his perspective and his actions will always shape the plot, and the importance of other characters will be determined by how their actions interact with Goku's.

2. *That said*: Importance of characters is no way equated with "fights won". Like, people are saying Piccolo has not been influential in the tournament. I disagree. His amazing fight with Frost is what revealed his weakness. And he has been there coming up with strategies and talking things out with Goku. It gives him this "advisor" vibe which he has always been so great at. He doesn't need to win a fight to be relevant. I've also think Super has made Bulma far more front and center than she has been in a while. Clearly she will never fight, but she is involved with the plot and has independent relationships with the new main recurring characters. And speaking of which, Whis, Beerus and Vados and Champa have been great characters.

To say "It is the Goku and Vegeta show" because they are the only ones winning fights: yeah, of course. They are our heroes, we should be rooting for them, and they are the best fighters. That doesn't mean all plot actions revolve around them or the other characters have not been relevant or engaging -- they just have contributed to the "non fighting" portions of the show -- like teaching, strategy, investigation, humor, setting, world-building, etc.

Yeah, other characters like Gohan haven't been as involved. But I don't think it is the last we have seen of him, for example. But it might not be in the role of a principal fighter. On the other hand, I think Buu is just a red herring. He is not much of a character other than "Mr. Satan's friend". To expect him to be a compelling fighter is not realistic about his "character development hierarchy". He is pretty far removed from Goku's plot.

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by TekTheNinja » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:28 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:
DragonHermit wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote:I don't think people want Goku stripped of his role as the main character
That's exactly what it is. People were complaining that GT didn't involve Vegeta, then Toriyama included Vegeta. Now they're complaining about Piccolo and Buu. Like wtf. Just enjoy the show. If you want to make Piccolo and Tien the main characters go write fan fiction.
People was even complaining that Goku and Vegeta didn't fight in the 2008 Jump Special. I remember some people here was like "Why is Goten and Trunks fighting? It should be Goku and Vegeta!". One thing I learn from DB fans is that they will want something and bitch about it when they finally get it.
You're referring to two different types of fans and acting as if they are the same people. They're not.
they just have contributed to the "non fighting" portions of the show -- like teaching, strategy, investigation, humor, setting, world-building, etc.
This is true of Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Z, and to a certain extent GT, but this is NOT true of Super. Most characters have barely even spoken.

User avatar
Draconic
I Live Here
Posts: 2091
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:44 pm
Location: Romania

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Draconic » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:53 pm

TekTheNinja wrote:
they just have contributed to the "non fighting" portions of the show -- like teaching, strategy, investigation, humor, setting, world-building, etc.
This is true of Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Z, and to a certain extent GT, but this is NOT true of Super. Most characters have barely even spoken.
Beerus, Whis, Champa, Vados, Kame-sennin, Tenshinhan, Jaco, Bulma, Mr Satan, Piccolo, Pilaf - all had something to do at one point or another in Super, outside of Goku and Vegeta. GT had Pan and kinda Trunks, with Vegeta coming at the end, not to provide anything but fusion-fodder. And Super is just 40 episodes. Of course Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z gave more time to more characters - combined they are 400 episodes! Super is utilizing it's characters well enough. Just that most of them don't fight, so people don't give a shit.
Check out the videos below, made by yours truly!

Goku vs Beerus BOG/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/kKKnMe

Vegeta vs Freeza ROF/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/MKPepW

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: Super is not so bad like someone says

Post by Kuririn Fan » Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:03 pm

How is it Goku and Vegeta clearing the entire Universe 6 team "utilizing characters well enough"?
Boo didn't even fight, Piccolo was wasted and Monaka is potentially the worst character in anything Dragon Ball related.

Post Reply