What kind of TV do you use the most for DBZ and how big is it!


Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
Won't a 4:3 show like DBZ look like crap on a 4K TV? Not that that's the only reason you'd buy one but since those two subjects came up I figured I'd ask.Ajay wrote:though I'd quite like to upgrade to a 4K TV at some point.
Why would it?NitroEX wrote:Won't a 4:3 show like DBZ look like crap on a 4K TV? Not that that's the only reason you'd buy one but since those two subjects came up I figured I'd ask.Ajay wrote:though I'd quite like to upgrade to a 4K TV at some point.
I'm no expert on the subject, I just assumed the picture would have to be stretched and might become pixelated. Judging by your response I guess I'm wrong about that.Ajay wrote:Why would it?NitroEX wrote:Won't a 4:3 show like DBZ look like crap on a 4K TV? Not that that's the only reason you'd buy one but since those two subjects came up I figured I'd ask.Ajay wrote:though I'd quite like to upgrade to a 4K TV at some point.![]()
I'm struggling to see the connection between aspect ratio and resolution.
Oh right! Nope, most if not all modern TVs will retain the original aspect ratio of the source material. Usually by default, but if not, you can find a menu to fix it.NitroEX wrote: I'm no expert on the subject, I just assumed the picture would have to be stretched and might become pixelated. Judging by your response I guess I'm wrong about that.
Generally true... but it depends on various elements of the upscaling. Some TVs do it better than others, some don't necessarily do it all that well (although this is less of an issue than it was with older HDTVs that sometimes scaled up things horribly.)Ajay wrote:Oh right! Nope, most if not all modern TVs will retain the original aspect ratio of the source material. Usually by default, but if not, you can find a menu to fix it.NitroEX wrote: I'm no expert on the subject, I just assumed the picture would have to be stretched and might become pixelated. Judging by your response I guess I'm wrong about that.
As for pixelation, these TVs have built in upscalers that interpolate SD and standard HD resolutions up to match the native 4K resolution of the screen. It's not magic, but it's never going to be outright worse than watching it on any other TV; you're not actually losing quality.
Hope that helps!
Very true. Had an old LG TV that would blur the ever-loving shit out of anything lower than its native resolution.MarcFBR wrote:Generally true... but it depends on various elements of the upscaling. Some TVs do it better than others, some don't necessarily do it all that well (although this is less of an issue than it was with older HDTVs that sometimes scaled up things horribly.)
JacobYBM wrote:Art is subjective but boobies are forever.
How is that monitor? I've been keeping my eye on it since it dropped and have only heard good things about it other than people receiving lemons.Ajay wrote:I tend to switch between two displays.
If I'm sat at my desk, I'm using my ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift. It's 27", 2560x1440, IPS, and also has G-Sync, alongside a 165Hz refresh rate for the best gaming experience. It's calibrated with a Spyder4 Pro colour calibration tool.
If I want to kick back, then I'm watching everything on a Samsung UE46F8000 that, much like MarcFBR said, has had its display adjusted to as close as I can get it without using the profile generated by the aforementioned calibration tool. It's pretty nice, though I'd quite like to upgrade to a 4K TV at some point.
Absurdly good.MrWalnut4 wrote:How is that monitor? I've been keeping my eye on it since it dropped and have only heard good things about it other than people receiving lemons.Ajay wrote:I'm using my ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift.
Guh, so tempted to take out another student loan. Guess I'll have to settle until I can save up for the big guns this summer. Those 1080's though... EVGA is going to get an absurd amount of my money.Ajay wrote:Absurdly good.MrWalnut4 wrote:How is that monitor? I've been keeping my eye on it since it dropped and have only heard good things about it other than people receiving lemons.Ajay wrote:I'm using my ASUS PG279Q ROG Swift.
I'd had a Samsung 120Hz monitor since 2011, but was never satisfied with its colour accuracy. There were many IPS monitors out there, but I wasn't ever willing to give up 120Hz+, since 60Hz feels as shitty as 30 after going back. Seeing this monitor announced was a dream come true.
I'm loving it so far. Colours are outstanding, gradients are smooth, and the jump from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 is wonderful -- seriously, the extra screen space is so nice. Though a word of warning: performance-wise, that jump is much bigger than I anticipated. I have a 5820K and two 980s in SLI, and even those have trouble pushing newer games up into the 100fps+ range at that resolution (I know that's extreme, but if you have a high refresh rate, you'll want to use it). Fortunately, G-Sync is pretty much crazy voodoo magic. Lower frame rates that would normally feel like utter shit don't actually feel too bad thanks to that tech. It was very handy while playing Rise of the Tomb Raider that featured some notoriously unoptimised areas.
One thing I would recommend, and it was noted in TFTCentral's review, is to keep the Response Time Overdrive setting on 'Normal' as the 'Extreme' setting introduces a lot of overshoot. It sits at about 5ms, which is a little higher than its TN counterparts, but the colour reproduction you get with IPS is a good trade-off.
Proper calibration is definitely essential as the monitor is quite green out of the box, and bright enough to make you feel like you're staring into the sun. The settings TFT list on their site are a good starting point, so tweaking from there should definitely give you optimal results.
Highly recommended. It's a little pricey, but it's absolutely worth it if you have a machine capable of driving it to its greatest potential. Now excuse me while I go and sell my kidney's for two 1080s...