The dragonball's overuse was responciable for the shadow Dragons, and yes, it happened at the end of the Super 17 Arc. Hell, I remember the Super 17 Arc only being made because they needed an extra Arc before the Shadow Dragons.HeroR wrote:I am almost certain that the Shadow Dragons happened because of the Dragon Balls being over used. How was the Dragon Balls being crack lead to the Super 17 Saga?MCDaveG wrote:
Because of how shitty it was written, with faint and forgetable plot lines, people forget that what was happening in hell and Super 17 Arc was thanks to Dragon Balls being broken.
It was stated in GT as I rewatched it recently.
"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
When Super apparently shoves Goku down our throats:
Spoiler:
Kanassa wrote:- FoolsGil, Out of Context, 2017FoolsGil wrote:I hope Mark is dead. But chances are the dragonballs will bring his stupid ass back.
- MCDaveG
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:54 pm
- Location: Prague, Czechia
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Yes, it was, you shall rewatch DBGT, the crack on Dragon Ball appears after the Baby arc and the negative energy allows the things in hell to went amis.Kanassa wrote:The dragonball's overuse was responciable for the shadow Dragons, and yes, it happened at the end of the Super 17 Arc. Hell, I remember the Super 17 Arc only being made because they needed an extra Arc before the Shadow Dragons.HeroR wrote:I am almost certain that the Shadow Dragons happened because of the Dragon Balls being over used. How was the Dragon Balls being crack lead to the Super 17 Saga?MCDaveG wrote:
Because of how shitty it was written, with faint and forgetable plot lines, people forget that what was happening in hell and Super 17 Arc was thanks to Dragon Balls being broken.
It was stated in GT as I rewatched it recently.
FighterZ, Street Fighter 6, Mortal Kombat: Funky_Strudel
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.
- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Super Saiyan 4 and some GT characters would look pretty cool in Super's animation style since we don't get enough in Heroes. And who says it has to be filler?Bullza wrote:I also wouldn't mind a filler saga where maybe GT Goku and Vegeta showed up. You know it'd be fun to see SSJB Goku and Vegeta vs SSJ4 Goku and Vegeta.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
This. There are too many rules and mechanics of GT's universe that simply don't mesh or work at all with the rules established by Super and Toriyama's other modern post-Z content. The Dragon Balls don't seem to be in any danger of spewing forth some random cigar-smoking dragon of evil, Hell is just as different as Freeza's afterlife, etc.Cipher wrote:Keep in mind that, to get down to the fine grain, it's not as if GT is just a splintered set of events that can be tacked onto the end of the Boo arc. It picks up on threads introduced in the original anime adaptation that differ from the manga (its interpretation of Hell, the Divine Water from the Garlic Jr. arc, the Tsufuru-jin, etc.). You'd have to have something fictionally causing the differences between the original anime and the manga, which opens a new whole can of worms.
Personally, I think it's more trouble than it's worth to assume all of the franchise's metafiction can be connected with the current system of universes/timelines Super uses. I haven't played Xenoverse, but I wouldn't take it as Shueisha's codified statement on how different elements of the metafiction fit together.
They work better as entirely separate continuities than different timelines, to be honest.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
These arguments make little sense, especially when you have Beerus claiming he killed all the dinosaurs but they're still running around. By that logic Super can't exist in the same timeline as Z. As for GT hell in pretty sure they said they were in a different region of hell than in Z.Marlowe89 wrote:This. There are too many rules and mechanics of GT's universe that simply don't mesh or work at all with the rules established by Super and Toriyama's other modern post-Z content. The Dragon Balls don't seem to be in any danger of spewing forth some random cigar-smoking dragon of evil, Hell is just as different as Freeza's afterlife, etc.Cipher wrote:Keep in mind that, to get down to the fine grain, it's not as if GT is just a splintered set of events that can be tacked onto the end of the Boo arc. It picks up on threads introduced in the original anime adaptation that differ from the manga (its interpretation of Hell, the Divine Water from the Garlic Jr. arc, the Tsufuru-jin, etc.). You'd have to have something fictionally causing the differences between the original anime and the manga, which opens a new whole can of worms.
Personally, I think it's more trouble than it's worth to assume all of the franchise's metafiction can be connected with the current system of universes/timelines Super uses. I haven't played Xenoverse, but I wouldn't take it as Shueisha's codified statement on how different elements of the metafiction fit together.
They work better as entirely separate continuities than different timelines, to be honest.
As for the DBs cracking I already have a theory for that.
1) the balls specifically absorb the negative energy from a positive wish causing them to cracks. The first wish in Super was neutral and probably did nothing. The second was Frieza and was probably so negative it flooded the balls with positive energy and bought them more time.
Plus I predict the entirety of Super will be completely rewinded to never happen in the existing time line anyway.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Dinosaurs actually appear in BoG and in Super, so I'm not sure what you're getting at. I'm not talking about some off-hand remarks by Beerus that are played up for comedic purposes, I'm specifically referring to hard established rules of DB's cosmology and overall universe.TheMikado wrote:These arguments make little sense, especially when you have Beerus claiming he killed all the dinosaurs but they're still running around.
The fact that you would need to plug in all this wildly implausible headcanon just to resolve the two stories as existing in the same continuity is precisely why they can't plausibly exist in the same continuity.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I guess I'm not understanding what you're saying as I'm pretty sure Hell was never in the original manga either...Marlowe89 wrote:Dinosaurs actually appear in BoG and in Super, so I'm not sure what you're getting at. I'm not talking about some off-hand remarks by Beerus that are played up for comedic purposes, I'm specifically referring to hard established rules of DB's cosmology and overall universe.TheMikado wrote:These arguments make little sense, especially when you have Beerus claiming he killed all the dinosaurs but they're still running around.
The fact that you would need to plug in all this wildly implausible headcanon just to resolve the two stories as existing in the same continuity is precisely why they can't plausibly exist in the same continuity.
Further the Hell described seems to share traits in Eastern culture of different sections. Think west version of 7 circles of hell.
http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/Hell
Basically your argument is that GT depicts something differently than FILLER in the anime?
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
No? I'm going to try this again.TheMikado wrote: Basically your argument is that GT depicts something differently than FILLER in the anime?
The Hell depicted in GT is exactly the same as the Hell depicted in Z filler, and incredibly different from Super/RoF's conception of Hell. Even the encounter with Freeza and Cell in GT basically picks up where the Z filler left off with their previous encounter.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Then Super is wrong as it's supposedly canon to the anime with filler and not the manga. That's what was officially stated here anyway.Marlowe89 wrote:No? I'm going to try this again.TheMikado wrote: Basically your argument is that GT depicts something differently than FILLER in the anime?
The Hell depicted in GT is exactly the same as the Hell depicted in Z filler, and incredibly different from Super/RoF's conception of Hell. Even the encounter with Freeza and Cell in GT basically picks up where the Z filler left off with their previous encounter.
Just so it's clear, I don't care either way as I don't believe in those canon rules
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Am I the only one having trouble associating the future trunks in super with the previous future trunks? He has blue hair, different super saiyan hairstyle (it's the same one against Freeza but not the one i'm used to), different outfit, different animation style, and i'm used to the dub so in some ways it doesn't really feel like future trunks. It's hard to explain, but even though I know he's future trunks he doesn't really invoke that sense of familiarity as much as he should. I'm not hating on the changes, in fact I like his new outfit more and feel pretty neutral on the animation style and hair color. But still, I've been trying to make a complete connection and I just cant. It might be my biggest problem with the arc. I don't blame Toei or Toriyama for it though.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Happens to me too.kinisking wrote:Am I the only one having trouble associating the future trunks in super with the previous future trunks? He has blue hair, different super saiyan hairstyle (it's the same one against Freeza but not the one i'm used to), different outfit, different animation style, and i'm used to the dub so in some ways it doesn't really feel like future trunks. It's hard to explain, but even though I know he's future trunks he doesn't really invoke that sense of familiarity as much as he should. I'm not hating on the changes, in fact I like his new outfit more and feel pretty neutral on the animation style and hair color. But still, I've been trying to make a complete connection and I just cant. It might be my biggest problem with the arc. I don't blame Toei or Toriyama for it though.
He should be older, and for some reason I don't like the way he's designed now. His clothes are alright, but his face is off 90% of the time.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I definitely agree with you on the feeling. Even with Takeshi Kusao voicing him, I don't get the same feeling and it's hard to connect them together. And this ain't no nostalgia either. I just don't get the same feeling I do from Trunks now that I do from his earlier time travels. I don't get the same "cool" feeling I'm afraid. Though, I've never been a fan of the blue hair or the skinny look on him currently. He looks younger than he did in Z to me. I ain't tryna hate on it. These are my honest thoughts. And I know it ain't because he's new because I actually kinda like him in the Super manga. And I like the way Young Jijii draws him.kinisking wrote:Am I the only one having trouble associating the future trunks in super with the previous future trunks? He has blue hair, different super saiyan hairstyle (it's the same one against Freeza but not the one i'm used to), different outfit, different animation style, and i'm used to the dub so in some ways it doesn't really feel like future trunks. It's hard to explain, but even though I know he's future trunks he doesn't really invoke that sense of familiarity as much as he should. I'm not hating on the changes, in fact I like his new outfit more and feel pretty neutral on the animation style and hair color. But still, I've been trying to make a complete connection and I just cant. It might be my biggest problem with the arc. I don't blame Toei or Toriyama for it though.
- Hellspawn28
- Patreon Supporter
- Posts: 15737
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
- Location: Maryland, USA
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Agree. I feel like Super and GT can't exist with each other. Nothing in Super was mention in GT and I know that GT was released first. I'm looking at things in a universe stand point of view seeing that everything in the past was mention again at least once. Not to mention Goku said that Yi Xing Long was the strongest person that he has ever met when Goku met Zeno who is the strongest being in the series. Also Goku mention that he didn't see Elder Kaioshin and Kibitoshin since the battle with Buu when Goku saw them again in Super.Bullza wrote:I really wouldn't mind GT officially being an alternate timeline. At least for me then I wouldn't have to watch it thinking "None of this stuff actually happened" and instead I could think of it as "This stuff happened just not in the main timeline."
I also wouldn't mind a filler saga where maybe GT Goku and Vegeta showed up. You know it'd be fun to see SSJB Goku and Vegeta vs SSJ4 Goku and Vegeta.
Shenron said at the end of GT that the gates of Hell in the Super 17 saga did cause the Dragon Balls to crack and release the negative energy inside them.HeroR wrote:
I am almost certain that the Shadow Dragons happened because of the Dragon Balls being over used. How was the Dragon Balls being crack lead to the Super 17 Saga?
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
^ if Super ends without any time splits or time rewinds then I would say they can't coexist, however just with the incredible setups here I have a feeling like they will rewind the entire series with a time rewind when it's done.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Yeah, the blue hair does take me out of recognizing Trunks a little. He also just looks a little younger, but maybe that's just Toriyama's modern style.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Woah glad to see everyone here talking about the Super/GT theory I brought up because it would be somewhat interesting but mainly just to have it okay that all the GT stuff happened because it happened in its own universe or timeline or however you want to put it. I can see it happening if DBS is to continue for a few years but right now no.
As for Trunks, I think it's fine how he is and he looks young still because as Vegeta put it a Saiyan stays in his prime for years and doesn't really age otherwise Goku and Vegeta even Gohan should look different too. I just wished he was given a different outfit than the green sweater.
As for Trunks, I think it's fine how he is and he looks young still because as Vegeta put it a Saiyan stays in his prime for years and doesn't really age otherwise Goku and Vegeta even Gohan should look different too. I just wished he was given a different outfit than the green sweater.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I have a feeling they are going to rewind and everyone's memories will be erased of meeting Beerus and the evens after BoG. Because Goku meeting all of these kaioshins and deities has caused this and that to happen. Then we'd be at the EoZ and Bulma saying I haven't seen you in 5 years would make sense. Everyone having their memory erased and Goku only thinking he can go SSJ3 would make sense and plus he'd be looking at Oob as a successor again because he's SSJ3-ish. If people like Beerus and Black, SSJB and such are around then I don't see how you could look at Oob as a successor. It'd be a sad ending but it could be a conclusion the Omni-King will come to once he sees all this time-warping and such going on, and the God of Destruction slacking because of him.TheMikado wrote:^ if Super ends without any time splits or time rewinds then I would say they can't coexist, however just with the incredible setups here I have a feeling like they will rewind the entire series with a time rewind when it's done.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I highly doubt Toriyama will erase everything he wrote since 2013, especially for such a stupid reason. Also, Goku mentioned Uub and how he couldn't wait to fight him again, and even considered having him fight during the first multiverse tournament.Xeztin wrote:I have a feeling they are going to rewind and everyone's memories will be erased of meeting Beerus and the evens after BoG. Because Goku meeting all of these kaioshins and deities has caused this and that to happen. Then we'd be at the EoZ and Bulma saying I haven't seen you in 5 years would make sense. Everyone having their memory erased and Goku only thinking he can go SSJ3 would make sense and plus he'd be looking at Oob as a successor again because he's SSJ3-ish. If people like Beerus and Black, SSJB and such are around then I don't see how you could look at Oob as a successor. It'd be a sad ending but it could be a conclusion the Omni-King will come to once he sees all this time-warping and such going on, and the God of Destruction slacking because of him.TheMikado wrote:^ if Super ends without any time splits or time rewinds then I would say they can't coexist, however just with the incredible setups here I have a feeling like they will rewind the entire series with a time rewind when it's done.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
There's no way Toriyama or anyone at Toei is going to rewind the clock and make everything we've been going through and everything we'll be going through irrelevant.
Beerus and Whis are currently fan favorites and Black is arguably that right now even though his arc isn't done yet so do you really think they're going to get rid of them and potential other fan favorites ?
That wouldn't make any sense from both a storytelling and a financial perspective and why would Toriyama undo years worth of work ? Because of a line Bulma said in the manga ? whenever Super ends I'm 100% sure it'll alter the manga's ending to fit within the current events and if by any small chance it doesn't, the manga's ending the way it currently is still works.
Beerus and Whis are currently fan favorites and Black is arguably that right now even though his arc isn't done yet so do you really think they're going to get rid of them and potential other fan favorites ?
That wouldn't make any sense from both a storytelling and a financial perspective and why would Toriyama undo years worth of work ? Because of a line Bulma said in the manga ? whenever Super ends I'm 100% sure it'll alter the manga's ending to fit within the current events and if by any small chance it doesn't, the manga's ending the way it currently is still works.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
It doesn't make it irrelevant, it's still a story that happened,sintzu wrote:There's no way Toriyama or anyone at Toei is going to rewind the clock and make everything we've been going through and everything we'll be going through irrelevant.
Beerus and Whis are currently fan favorites and Black is arguably that right now even though his arc isn't done yet so do you really think they're going to get rid of them and potential other fan favorites ?
That wouldn't make any sense from both a storytelling and a financial perspective and why would Toriyama undo years worth of work ? Because of a line Bulma said in the manga ? whenever Super ends I'm 100% sure it'll alter the manga's ending to fit within the current events and if by any small chance it doesn't, the manga's ending the way it currently is still works.
As it stands now Goku has literally gotten to he end of all existence by meeting the omniking, there's not too many places you can go with this. When have God powers running amok, casual loops in time, and multiple time splits which span multiple universes. All these things are pretty serious crimes, if Zen'o gets mad and wipes out universes for petty things what makes you think he's not going to do something for much more serious actions???
He likes Goku which is why he would probably spare the universes but only under the conditions Xeztin stated because it literally just make sense and it's an easy way to keep and resale all their other media without making it irrelevant. Like you say they like money a why wouldn't they want to keep as much merchandise relevant that that ALREADY have as possible.











