"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
Saikyo no Senshi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:08 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Saikyo no Senshi » Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:54 am

Looks like Tomioka is going to write the majority of the arc. I was expecting King Ryuu to do at least 1 ep. Hopefully he will later on.

- Travis

User avatar
namekiansaiyan
I Live Here
Posts: 4358
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:39 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by namekiansaiyan » Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:55 am

This arc seems to be turning into a complete mess with too much stopping then starting.

User avatar
dbs fanboy
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Spain

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by dbs fanboy » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:05 am

I really doubt Zamasu is dead unless he didn't wish for inmortality and Beerus destroyed his body. I mean, think about it, suddenly they're spoiling a major character's death, sound suspicious, it's exactly like how it was implyed that Zamasu was Black and they ended up being different characters.

Also because the way it happens, it sounds too easy, i mean, if Zamasu didn't use the Super Dragon balls then yeah it would be clear for me, but as he used them..........

Also lets think about the mistake that Beerus might have done if Zamasu was really dead. Gowasu was murdered by Zamasu, as Zamasu probably took his earings, he probably became a Kaioshin, but when Beerus killed him, he ended up killing the god of destruction of universe 10 as well, if Zeno ends up knowing this...........
The god of destruction of U7 suddenly murder The Kaioshin and god of destruction of another universe, Beerus might be in trouble.

Remember that in this arc more gods would be involved and even Zeno himself according to what Toriyama spoiled.
Last edited by dbs fanboy on Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
I really miss ma boy, Black :( :cry:


dbgtFO wrote:

User avatar
MajinMan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1237
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:42 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by MajinMan » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:11 am

Maybe the summary meant the future of the current timeline? Who knows. Besides, the episode airs like 3 weeks later. Let's not jump the gun by calling it a "plothole."
Heroes come and go, but legends are forever.

60.

Rest in peace.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:18 am

dbs fanboy wrote:I really doubt Zamasu is dead unless he didn't wish for inmortality and Beerus destroyed his body. I mean, think about it, suddenly they're spoiling a major character's death, sound suspicious, it's exactly like how it was implyed that Zamasu was Black and they ended up being different characters.

Also because the way it happens, it sounds too easy, i mean, if Zamasu didn't use the Super Dragon balls then yeah it would be clear for me, but as he used them..........

Also lets think about the mistake that Beerus might have done if Zamasu was really dead. Gowasu was murdered by Zamasu, as Zamasu probably took his earings, he probably became a Kaioshin, but when Beerus killed him, he ended up killing the god of destruction of universe 10 as well, if Zeno ends up knowing this...........
The god of destruction of U7 suddenly murder The Kaioshin and god of destruction of another universe, Beerus might be in trouble.

Remember than in this arc more gods would be involved and even Zeno himself according to what Toriyama spoiled.
That is assuming that Gowasu is only the only Supreme Kai. Remember U7 had five, but all but one was wiped out by Buu.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6411
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Cipher » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:19 am

For everything else this arc is doing, I do love that in large part it's managed to be a weird whodunnit pulling in more and more high gods. I don't think that's something any of us could have predicted at the start.

vilker
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:12 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by vilker » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:21 am

Avery wrote:Oh God, "Trunks feels uneasy"...of course you idiot! You of all people should know very well that's not how timelines work! I know I'm overreacting here but I was very concerned about this important detail. I really hope they didn't completely forget about it.

I don't think Present Zamasu is really dead. That'd be such a waste. He might have already achieved immortality and faked his death or something...or at least that's what I hope.
If present Zamasu it's future Zamasu, yes feels uneasy makes sense. If Zamasu is trully dead in present, never will be able to travel to the future and never could meet Black and defeat Trunks, Vegeta and Goku.

User avatar
dbs fanboy
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 4:08 pm
Location: Spain

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by dbs fanboy » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:23 am

HeroR wrote:
dbs fanboy wrote:I really doubt Zamasu is dead unless he didn't wish for inmortality and Beerus destroyed his body. I mean, think about it, suddenly they're spoiling a major character's death, sound suspicious, it's exactly like how it was implyed that Zamasu was Black and they ended up being different characters.

Also because the way it happens, it sounds too easy, i mean, if Zamasu didn't use the Super Dragon balls then yeah it would be clear for me, but as he used them..........

Also lets think about the mistake that Beerus might have done if Zamasu was really dead. Gowasu was murdered by Zamasu, as Zamasu probably took his earings, he probably became a Kaioshin, but when Beerus killed him, he ended up killing the god of destruction of universe 10 as well, if Zeno ends up knowing this...........
The god of destruction of U7 suddenly murder The Kaioshin and god of destruction of another universe, Beerus might be in trouble.

Remember than in this arc more gods would be involved and even Zeno himself according to what Toriyama spoiled.
That is assuming that Gowasu is only the only Supreme Kai. Remember U7 had five, but all but one was wiped out by Buu.
True, but who knows?
I really miss ma boy, Black :( :cry:


dbgtFO wrote:

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:32 am

vilker wrote:
Avery wrote:Oh God, "Trunks feels uneasy"...of course you idiot! You of all people should know very well that's not how timelines work! I know I'm overreacting here but I was very concerned about this important detail. I really hope they didn't completely forget about it.

I don't think Present Zamasu is really dead. That'd be such a waste. He might have already achieved immortality and faked his death or something...or at least that's what I hope.
If present Zamasu it's future Zamasu, yes feels uneasy makes sense. If Zamasu is trully dead in present, never will be able to travel to the future and never could meet Black and defeat Trunks, Vegeta and Goku.
This.

Future Zamaus can't be native to Trunks' time. He knew who Goku was and wanted to personally to kill him for insulting and fighting the gods. That encounter couldn't have happened in Trunks' timeline since the only reason why Goku came to Zamasu was to see if he was Black and Goku in that time is long dead. Zamasu also only learned about the Super Dragon Ball because of the tournament between U6 and U7, something that only happened because Beerus has a prophecy about fighting a Super Saiyan God and making friends with Goku.

In other words, the events that made Zamasu evil doesn't exist in the future timeline. And even if it was predestined for him to turn against mortals, he shouldn't have a personal grudge against Goku.

Beerus probably assumed he broke the link so Zamasu from the present couldn't travel to Trunks' time, therefore stopping Future Zamasu in his tracks. However, that doesn't seems to be the case at all. Especially if Zamaus made a wish on the Super Dragon Balls, what did he wish for that wasn't immortality.
Last edited by HeroR on Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
Ajay
Moderator
Posts: 6221
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 6:15 pm
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Ajay » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:33 am

Vados_chan wrote:Let's face only Z fanboys think F is better than BoG cause of "muh action" and "muh dark tone"
This is not an appropriate response.

If you ever find yourself making generalisations that include the word "fanboy", then you should probably reconsider what you're about to post.

Disagreeing with people is fine. Replying with a total lack of respect is not. Please rereview the forum rules.
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.

Deadtuber.

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:18 am

namekiansaiyan wrote:This arc seems to be turning into a complete mess with too much stopping then starting.
Mess isn't the right word, I'd say hurting momentum would be better choice of words but they're only stopping for two episodes this time as opposed to taking forever last time and there doesn't look like were going to get fluff like last time seems these two episodes will be dedicated to furthering Zamasu's development.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:44 am

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
namekiansaiyan wrote:This arc seems to be turning into a complete mess with too much stopping then starting.
Mess isn't the right word, I'd say hurting momentum would be better choice of words but they're only stopping for two episodes this time as opposed to taking forever last time and there doesn't look like were going to get fluff like last time seems these two episodes will be dedicated to furthering Zamasu's development.
It also makes no sense to complain about the pacing of episodes that no one hasn't even seen yet.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7798
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by jjgp1112 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:49 am

It's clear to me that Zamasu and Black in Trunks' timeline actually come from an entirely seperate timeline themselves.

I believe that the rules of the time ring are that you can only travel between the future and your present timeline. Actually traveling in time is what creates seperate timelines and time rings. So what I'm thinking is that the Zamasu who goes to Trunks' timeline is from the not-so-distant future of the main timeline...but since Trunks' timeline and the present timeline are inextricably linked by the time ring, the timeline this "Future" Zamasu travels to with the ring is Trunks'. It's a little confusing but I think this makes sense. It's kind of an odd paradox.
Last edited by jjgp1112 on Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:02 am, edited 5 times in total.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

Lujin_16
Regular
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:18 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lujin_16 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:52 am

I have a felling that Beerus will die in this arc

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:01 am

jjgp1112 wrote:It's clear to me that Zamasu and Black in Trunks' timeline actually come from an entirely seperate timeline themselves.

I believe that the rules of the time ring are that you can only travel between the future and your present timeline. Actually traveling in time is what creates seperate timelines. So what I'm thinking is that the Zamasu who goes to Trunks' timeline is from a less distant future of the main timeline...but since Trunks' timeline and the present timeline are inextricably linked, the timeline this "Future" Zamasu travels to with the ring is his. It's a little confusing but I think this makes sense. It's kind of an odd paradox.
Not true. You can travel to alternative timelines thought the green Time Rings. Also, Black's ring specifically is silver. And traveling to the past creates separate timelines, not time travel itself.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7798
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by jjgp1112 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:10 am

HeroR wrote:
jjgp1112 wrote:It's clear to me that Zamasu and Black in Trunks' timeline actually come from an entirely seperate timeline themselves.

I believe that the rules of the time ring are that you can only travel between the future and your present timeline. Actually traveling in time is what creates seperate timelines. So what I'm thinking is that the Zamasu who goes to Trunks' timeline is from a less distant future of the main timeline...but since Trunks' timeline and the present timeline are inextricably linked, the timeline this "Future" Zamasu travels to with the ring is his. It's a little confusing but I think this makes sense. It's kind of an odd paradox.
Not true. You can travel to alternative timelines thought the green Time Rings. Also, Black's ring specifically is silver. And traveling to the past creates separate timelines, not time travel itself.
So in that case, maybe the Silver Ring is a "universal key" that allows a user to travel to any timeline? And I thought the time ring only allows you to go the past when somebody else does it through different means, like the time machine.

Somebody in another thread theorized that all of the zipping and zapping through time by Black has created a casual time loop where the only reason Black exists is because he travels to the past and fights Goku, triggering Goku to meet and fight Zamasu, triggering Zamasu to go crazy and create Black, who travels to Trunks' time with the silver ring! That's why Time travel is so strange in fiction.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:16 am

jjgp1112 wrote:
HeroR wrote:
jjgp1112 wrote:It's clear to me that Zamasu and Black in Trunks' timeline actually come from an entirely seperate timeline themselves.

I believe that the rules of the time ring are that you can only travel between the future and your present timeline. Actually traveling in time is what creates seperate timelines. So what I'm thinking is that the Zamasu who goes to Trunks' timeline is from a less distant future of the main timeline...but since Trunks' timeline and the present timeline are inextricably linked, the timeline this "Future" Zamasu travels to with the ring is his. It's a little confusing but I think this makes sense. It's kind of an odd paradox.
Not true. You can travel to alternative timelines through the green Time Rings. Also, Black's ring specifically is silver. And traveling to the past creates separate timelines, not time travel itself.
So in that case, maybe the Silver Ring is a "universal key" that allows a user to travel to any timeline?
That isn't how Gowasu explained it. Most likely, the silver Time Ring is the 'main timeline' ring, while the green ones let you travel to alternative timelines. If the silver one was an universal key, I wouldn't see why they even have the green Time Rings.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

vilker
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:12 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by vilker » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:16 am

HeroR wrote:
jjgp1112 wrote:It's clear to me that Zamasu and Black in Trunks' timeline actually come from an entirely seperate timeline themselves.

I believe that the rules of the time ring are that you can only travel between the future and your present timeline. Actually traveling in time is what creates seperate timelines. So what I'm thinking is that the Zamasu who goes to Trunks' timeline is from a less distant future of the main timeline...but since Trunks' timeline and the present timeline are inextricably linked, the timeline this "Future" Zamasu travels to with the ring is his. It's a little confusing but I think this makes sense. It's kind of an odd paradox.
Not true. You can travel to alternative timelines thought the green Time Rings. Also, Black's ring specifically is silver. And traveling to the past creates separate timelines, not time travel itself.
What if Zamasu came from another timeline with green ring and then in Trunks timeline stole the silver ring.

And what if Zamasu went to Trunks timeline with all the rings in the pocket, He has 2 silver rings and 8 green rings :o

User avatar
LightBing
I Live Here
Posts: 4032
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by LightBing » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:22 am

Is it just me or isn't it really obvious that Black is Zamasu "ghost", they have the same eyes. We don't know how immortality works in Mr.Toriyama head, it might be a Voldemort type of deal. "Ghost" just goes to where there's a Goku body to possess.

It appears the opportunity for plot holes is being set. We have to wait and see. I'm hopeful it's all Gods magic that will make everything work, still Trunks not understanding how timelines works is pretty serious, it would make the Android Arc a plot hole. Maybe it's just a void tagline to incur drama, I'm pretty sure we had one of those before.

RIP Gowasu (Ep53 - Ep60), you should have see it coming.

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7798
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by jjgp1112 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:32 am

HeroR wrote:
jjgp1112 wrote:
HeroR wrote:
Not true. You can travel to alternative timelines through the green Time Rings. Also, Black's ring specifically is silver. And traveling to the past creates separate timelines, not time travel itself.
So in that case, maybe the Silver Ring is a "universal key" that allows a user to travel to any timeline?
That isn't how Gowasu explained it. Most likely, the silver Time Ring is the 'main timeline' ring, while the green ones let you travel to alternative timelines. If the silver one was an universal key, I wouldn't see why they even have the green Time Rings.
Ah yeah, that makes sense. So I guess vilker's first theory would ring true then (I swear that pun wasn't intended), as opposed to the universal key stuff.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

Post Reply