Avoid bringing drama to a page where people talk about animation.....Bansho64 wrote:Don't change what you said. You originally said that it's "awesome" to not have them and that people who do like them don't "get it", like there's something wrong with the people who do like them.Mazingerdestro wrote: It's not my opinion...it's just the truth. The loops was a cheap way to have animation on screen without producing original animation for every moment .
That's your opinion if you think it's awesome to not have them. Don't treat the others who do like them like there's something wrong with them. As I said before, nobody needs to "get" anything.
Numerous people who are knowledgeable animation have said here that they liked them, just like there have people who have said they don't. Heck, even Ajay said he liked them. You saying there's something wrong with all of them just seems like you not wanting to face the fact that your opinion is just that; an opinion. None of us need to "get" anything.
Super Animation Catalogue 2.0
- Mazingerdestro
- Regular
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 5:42 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
You started this when you stated the people who like the loops don't "get it". If you didn't want someone to call you out on that, then you shouldn't have said it in the first place.Mazingerdestro wrote: Avoid bringing drama to a page where people talk about animation.....
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Let's stop arguing, please.
Yes, loops are a conservative means of animation, but whether you like them or not is of course an opinion.
I don't think there's much more to say on that, so let's move along. Thanks.
Yes, loops are a conservative means of animation, but whether you like them or not is of course an opinion.
I don't think there's much more to say on that, so let's move along. Thanks.
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.
Deadtuber.
Deadtuber.
- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
New page, so I'll leave this here just in case.
Anyone have these two shots?:
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Here.Anime Kitten wrote:New page, so I'll leave this here just in case.
Anyone have these two shots?:
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
[spoiler]

[/spoiler]- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Thank ya.ArchedThunder wrote:Here.
So if NewType was wrong about this episode, could that potentially (but not necessarily) mean it could be wrong about the upcoming episodes?
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Absolutely possible. It's really hard to tell who the next episode is, but for some reason I feel like it will be Karasawa paired up with one of the secondary supervisors and then 66 will be Tate and Ishikawa giving us a big spectacle. Though that Kamehameha shot of Goku's face looks like it could be Ishikawa.Anime Kitten wrote:Thank ya.ArchedThunder wrote:Here.
So if NewType was wrong about this episode, could that potentially (but not necessarily) mean it could be wrong about the upcoming episodes?
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
The art in this episode was better than the last one IMO
乃亜
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
You know what, I take it back, I do think Ishikawa is definitely on the next episode, that shot of Goku doing the Kamehameha is definitely him.
But I wonder about these, are they Ishikawa as well?
[spoiler]

[/spoiler]
This looks like a somewhat more polished Higashide shot than we typically see, but I could be wrong.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
And this is the only thing that looked like it might be Tate to me, but the pointy nose is throwing me off.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
But I wonder about these, are they Ishikawa as well?
[spoiler]


[/spoiler]This looks like a somewhat more polished Higashide shot than we typically see, but I could be wrong.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]And this is the only thing that looked like it might be Tate to me, but the pointy nose is throwing me off.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Those top 3 images do look like ishikawa to me because of the nose, eyebrows and eyes.
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
That's what I thought as well, but the heads are kinda round so that's why I question it.Sodhi wrote:Those top 3 images do look like ishikawa to me because of the nose, eyebrows and eyes.
- Mazingerdestro
- Regular
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 5:42 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
The nose and jaw look like Tate but in general the expression looks way too detailed (poor choice of words) for Tate. However, we have seen him drawing detailed models so I will give a 70%-80% that this is Tate.ArchedThunder wrote:And this is the only thing that looked like it might be Tate to me, but the pointy nose is throwing me off.
[spoiler][/spoiler]
ArchedThunder wrote: Here.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
For some reason this Goku reminds me episode 13 when Goku was ssj.
- DragonBalllKaiHD
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2736
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:37 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
Well, this is frustrating and depressing. The episode may be more on-model, but it had ugly "animation" or rather lack thereof. This episode was very rushed. Each of the cut in this episode was badly flowing to one another.
People kept saying the schedule was returning to normal, but how the staff was assembled in this arc really shows you that the schedule is still hell. It's a total mess. Yashima had been supervised for two straight episodes. Naoki Tate was acting more of a key animator rather than an animation supervisor, despite his name being attached to it. This arc even has so far featured two animation supervisors for one episode, which basically tells you how the state of the production is. There's nothing really noteworthy in this arc, except Shida's return and Tate's action cuts. Being on-models mean nothing when you have an ugly animation to show for.
You don't like how I say it? Blame it all on the planning committee. The idiots have no clue on how to handle the staff.
People kept saying the schedule was returning to normal, but how the staff was assembled in this arc really shows you that the schedule is still hell. It's a total mess. Yashima had been supervised for two straight episodes. Naoki Tate was acting more of a key animator rather than an animation supervisor, despite his name being attached to it. This arc even has so far featured two animation supervisors for one episode, which basically tells you how the state of the production is. There's nothing really noteworthy in this arc, except Shida's return and Tate's action cuts. Being on-models mean nothing when you have an ugly animation to show for.
You don't like how I say it? Blame it all on the planning committee. The idiots have no clue on how to handle the staff.
Last edited by DragonBalllKaiHD on Sun Oct 30, 2016 3:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru's #1 biggest fan
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
I honestly wouldn't mind if Toei just outsourced all of the episodes between this arc and Toriyama's next arc so they can get some of their shit together. It looks like now the problem has become lack of talented staff more than lack of time at this point. Not saying that more time wouldn't help of course, but still.
-
dhaval_dongre
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 2:42 pm
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
The schedule is still tight. But it has definitely improved from where it was before. We still have multiple supervisors working on most episodes, with a few exceptions. I know it is sad that the schedule is still not at the place we want it to be, but it is obvious that it won't get better overnight. It is gonna take time. The Potafeu arc definitely helped though and going by what Toyotaro said in the interview, we are probably going to have another filler arc, so that should help as well.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Well, this is frustrating and depressing. The episode may be more on-model, but it had ugly "animation" or rather lack thereof. This episode was very rushed. Each of the cut in this episode was badly flowing to one another.
People kept saying the schedule was returning to normal, but how the staff was assembled in this arc really shows you that the schedule was still hell. It was a total mess. Yashima had been supervised for two straight episodes. Naoki Tate was acting more of a key animator rather than an animation supervisor, despite his name being attached to it. This arc even has so far featured two animation supervisors for one episode, which basically tells you how the state of the production is. There's nothing really noteworthy in this arc, except Shida's return and Tate's action cuts. Being on-models mean nothing when you have an ugly animation to show for.
You don't like how I say it? Blame it all on the planning committee. The idiots have no clue on how to handle the staff.
Regarding the animation I disagree, other than Shida and Tate, Shimanuki's, Karasawa's, Manabe's and Higashide's work has also been nice. Obviously it is nothing extraordinary or out of this world, but I have certainly enjoyed their work as well.
Last edited by dhaval_dongre on Sun Oct 30, 2016 3:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
I think higashide has note worthy cuts, along with moments in 61 and 57.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Well, this is frustrating and depressing. The episode may be more on-model, but it had ugly "animation" or rather lack thereof. This episode was very rushed. Each of the cut in this episode was badly flowing to one another.
People kept saying the schedule was returning to normal, but how the staff was assembled in this arc really shows you that the schedule was still hell. It was a total mess. Yashima had been supervised for two straight episodes. Naoki Tate was acting more of a key animator rather than an animation supervisor, despite his name being attached to it. This arc even has so far featured two animation supervisors for one episode, which basically tells you how the state of the production is. There's nothing really noteworthy in this arc, except Shida's return and Tate's action cuts. Being on-models mean nothing when you have an ugly animation to show for.
You don't like how I say it? Blame it all on the planning committee. The idiots have no clue on how to handle the staff.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
I think you are really over reacting, like I said before the only parts that really lacked animation where it needed it was the stuff involving the Black clones and Zamasu and Black spinning while fusing, outside of that there was animation where there needed to be, the opening bit of Vegeta vs Black was fine for example. There wasn't really any note worthy animation in the episode, sure, but for what was very likely a strategically sacrificed episode it managed to turn out fine. Yashima working on two episodes in a row was weird, sure, but that just means the other supervisors and animators get more time on their upcoming episodes so it makes a whole lot of sense. Yashima typically solos episodes anyways, so dividing his work between two episodes with other animators to give the rest of the staff more time is actually pretty smart. I honestly am not sure what you mean with the Tate thing. Two supervisors for episodes is not always a bad sign, Pokemon for example very often has 2 supervisors with assistant supervisors on top of that, and we've also started to see episodes with one supervisor for the first time in a long time this arc. You really can't deny that the schedule has improved, we more regularly get nice animation and more on model looking episodes. Episodes 47, 48, 50, 54, 56, 57, 59, 61 and 63 all range from pretty good to pretty great, where as in past arcs we wouldn't get nearly that many good episodes. Super could really use some more animators right now, One Piece, Digimon, Tiger Mask and PreCure all have more animators on their recent episodes than Super does, but Toei is stretched very thin and I can't blame the animators for not choosing to work on Super because its schedule still isn't where it needs to be, but despite this the Super staff are managing to keep things afloat.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Well, this is frustrating and depressing. The episode may be more on-model, but it had ugly "animation" or rather lack thereof. This episode was very rushed. Each of the cut in this episode was badly flowing to one another.
People kept saying the schedule was returning to normal, but how the staff was assembled in this arc really shows you that the schedule was still hell. It was a total mess. Yashima had been supervised for two straight episodes. Naoki Tate was acting more of a key animator rather than an animation supervisor, despite his name being attached to it. This arc even has so far featured two animation supervisors for one episode, which basically tells you how the state of the production is. There's nothing really noteworthy in this arc, except Shida's return and Tate's action cuts. Being on-models mean nothing when you have an ugly animation to show for.
You don't like how I say it? Blame it all on the planning committee. The idiots have no clue on how to handle the staff.
Last edited by ArchedThunder on Sun Oct 30, 2016 3:34 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
Saikyo no Senshi
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:08 am
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
This is exactly why Higashide is considered wasted. I'd rather have one good action cut from him than him popping up every episode just to maintain the quality and doing nothing noteworthy.ArchedThunder wrote: And why is it that whenever we have an episode where Higashide doesn't do anything of note he's "wasted"? His role this arc has clearly never been to supply high quality animation, but to do as much animation as possible episode to episode to help the overall quality. Higashide fills a role that Super really needed filled.
Last edited by Saikyo no Senshi on Sun Oct 30, 2016 4:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
I absolutely hate when they do this:

Like, why isn't the light reflecting on the characters? It's one of the things that bother me the most.

Like, why isn't the light reflecting on the characters? It's one of the things that bother me the most.
Re: Super Animation Catalogue 2.0 - Episode 63
That doesn't tell anything, it's absolutely common in anime these days. You often see 2, 3, 4 supervisors in the same episode.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:This arc even has so far featured two animation supervisors for one episode, which basically tells you how the state of the production is.





[/spoiler]





