Should Super be canon in your mind?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

UltimateHammerBro
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1214
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:50 am
Location: Spain

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by UltimateHammerBro » Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:04 pm

At this point, since different media in the franchise contradict each other, I feel like different canons exist, but what comprises each of them fluctuates depending on how I feel about it.

I can see Super as part of a shared canon with Kai, but among the canons which I consider to be "the original story", which are the original 42-volume manga canon and the original anime+TV specials (and depending on the day, GT) canon, I feel Super, anime or manga, doesn't belong to any of them.

For me, Super is an interesting side story. Make of that what you will :lol:
I'm a webcomic artist! Check out http://tapastic.com/series/Hearts

mabalia
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:43 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by mabalia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:16 pm

Ssenrof wrote:
mabalia wrote:I like the ideas behind each arcs DBS has showed us, what I didn't like was their execution it should've been better in that regard. Goku's characterization is the worst portrayal I've seen of him from the series, he's not like manga Goku nor like dbz anime Goku, they regressed his character to remind us of that kid Goku isolated in a forest, alienated of how society works and what human culture is.
And I don't blame this only on Toei, I think Toriyama is also responsable for this revisited Goku who's different to how he wrote him in the past, if we take toriyama's recent interviews in consideration. And it's hard to take his opinion that serious nowadays when he always excuse himself saying he forgets things, characters from his own manga (I try to analyze what he says in his interviews, if a new information don't contradict his manga I accept it, if contradicts I ignore).
So I accept the events of super during the 10 years as canon, not exactly in the way it was done but knowing BOG, Freeza, Champa tournament and Zamasu happened at that time.

It's interesting that GT had Goku turn into a child, but keep his adult mind ( more or less) and Super has Goku keep his adult body but revert to a child's mentality.


Toriyama is like the case study on how content creators don't automatically know more about their own series than the fans.

Has any fan you ever met confused SS2 for SS3? Even the most casual of fans don't make that mistake. His power comparison for the BoG movies, his statement about Goku not using SS2 or SS3 anymore- it's all crap. Take his staments with a massive grain of salt.

As for cannon, it really depends on how it fits into the 10 year time skip. If super retcons the original ending, I'd probably still consider the original ending to be cannon in my heart.

If Super somehow fits into the original continuity- then I'll take it.
Yeah. Toriyama is a very talented artist, he's great to provide expansion to the story, the new characters he created are good (I like Beerus, Whis, Jaco and so many others) but the portrayal of the old ones feels disconected, especially Goku, the character is reduced to his most basic traits and regressed his development in the Buu arc and the others arcs before too. It's a shame because he's the main character and a fan favorite.
At least we still have Toyotaro and honestly I trust him to make a good work in the franchise, he's a dragon ball fan and a Goku fan, I feel he's very conected to the series with a good grasp of the characters.
(And Toyotaro is more likely to Know the answer to those types of questions/comments that made Toriyama wonder who's Tao Pai Pai for exemple :P )

User avatar
toadma
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:26 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by toadma » Thu Dec 08, 2016 12:47 am

I only consider BOG canon it did present the whole god thing perfectly and maybe the characters from Suoer to exist.But the bad written fanfiction arcs Toriyama has done its really hard to consider it even though its has poetential.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by DragonHermit » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:14 am

I consider it like GT (fanfic). Don't get me wrong I enjoyed this arc, but I just can't accept something like the Trunks outcome. To me Trunks is resting in peace somewhere in the future after killing Androids.

After all he went through, I'd like to think the "hope" in his time machine, wasn't useless. I don't mind darkness, but unnecessary darkness is something else.

Image

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by sintzu » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:33 am

Ssenrof wrote:Toriyama is like the case study on how content creators don't automatically know more about their own series than the fans.
It's been 20 years since the original ended so Toriyama isn't the same person he was before.

In the original he tried to connect everything together to make it feel like one planned out story (he says this in an interview) while 20 years later now, he isn't doing that but instead is just having fun in the world he created and is doing things that don't really make much sense.

I think this would happen to any creator and franchise after coming out of retirement after 2 decades so fans shouldn't expect the same thing they got that long ago cause the chances of that happening are slim to non.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by precita » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:49 am

The series is canon. I don't understand people saying things like it, "feels like bad fanfiction" or "it doesn't feel official."

You could easily say that about anything that happened in Dragonball Z. Goku suddenly being an alien, Androids and Cell, Buu eating people, Fusion, Goku having a son, a transformation that makes your hair blonde, etc.

If Super's storylines happened 20 years ago after the Buu arc none of you would bat an eye.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by sintzu » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:51 am

precita wrote:If Super's storylines happened 20 years ago after the Buu arc none of you would bat an eye.
That's because it would've been better in every possible way.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by precita » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:52 am

sintzu wrote:
precita wrote:If Super's storylines happened 20 years ago after the Buu arc none of you would bat an eye.
That's because it would've been better in every possible way.
Assuming the storylines played out nearly identical, I think everything that happened now would be accepted if it happened back in 1995/1996 right after the Buu arc in the manga.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by sintzu » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:56 am

precita wrote:Assuming the storylines played out nearly identical...
It wouldn't, characters like Piccolo and Gohan wouldn't be thrown to the side, characters would've continued to develop, there characters' looks would've changed from one arc to the other, it would've kept moving the story forward after the 28th tenkaichi, it's arcs would be more connected to one another & they wouldn't have been rushed.

There are probably more but these are what I can think of now.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by DragonHermit » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:57 am

The problem with Super is that it's Toriyama's nephew not child. He's too removed from the final product, and other writer have to fill in the holes, making a giant clusterfuck. In addition, it's made 20 years after, when Toriyama forgot about Launch and Merc. Tao a few chapters after he'd written about them.

Again, not saying anything about the show being bad (because I don't think it is though it clearly has massive problems).

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by sintzu » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:00 am

DragonHermit wrote:The problem with Super is that it's Toriyama's nephew not child. He's too removed from the final product, and other writer have to fill in the holes, making a giant clusterfuck.
This is another major difference between Super and the original, I think if Toriyama worked on it as a full weekly manga with Toyotoro then the final result would've been better.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
Yomi
Regular
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:45 am

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by Yomi » Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:24 am

precita wrote:The series is canon. I don't understand people saying things like it, "feels like bad fanfiction" or "it doesn't feel official."

You could easily say that about anything that happened in Dragonball Z. Goku suddenly being an alien, Androids and Cell, Buu eating people, Fusion, Goku having a son, a transformation that makes your hair blonde, etc.

If Super's storylines happened 20 years ago after the Buu arc none of you would bat an eye.
That's an interesting point, people would be yelling. "Remember Zamasu? he was deep, nothing can top that Vegito vs Zamasu animation."
:clap:

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:07 am

I don't understand OP's question, Super is canon whether we like it or not lol

User avatar
Bulma's Foot Masseur
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 7:48 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by Bulma's Foot Masseur » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:44 am

I consider the anime canon. I know quite a few people choose to canonize the movies over their Super counterparts since they're, well...better, but I can't rationalize that when the inconsistencies are a result of Toei readapting their own work and making conscious decisions to redo things. (Like Goku powering down from Blue before he gets shot by the laser ring.)

I consider aspects of the manga canon when they're compatible with the anime, like the knowledge that Pilaf's gang made their youth wish during the Android saga, but only then.

User avatar
Akyon
Regular
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:02 am

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by Akyon » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:08 am

Yes. All of it from the good to the bad. Zamasu, Beerus, Jaco and Pink glob monster alike

In fact the only thing I'd consider non canon from Super is arguably the Arale episode from this week because it leans so heavily on the fourth wall it feels like when Steven Universe crossed over with Uncle Grandpa. Arale herself is canon to the Dragon World though in my mind lest we screw up the whole Red Ribbon Army arc.
Favourite User quote:
Vice wrote:"Look at all these characters getting some shine in the buildup for the tournament of power, maybe we'll get to see some other characters do some stuff instead of the same old shit."
1. Goku (Universe 7) has eliminated 6 competitor & Vegeta (Universe 7) has eliminated 6 competitors


"Fuck."

User avatar
Alruneia
I Live Here
Posts: 2053
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:40 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by Alruneia » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:48 am

Well, to me, the manga is. I believe Toyotarou is doing a much better job in general than Toei is, so I've decided that for me, his telling of the story is the correct one. I also have it so that if/when Super makes itself impossible to fit with EoZ, I'm going to consider it non-canon.
Probably Kanzenshuu's biggest Bulla fangirl. Current avatar: DBU Bulla as Sailor Princess Sadala, based on Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance

Dragon Ball Ultimate - 74 out of 150 chapters complete
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Action Blue - link
Sailor Moon: Mindful of Love - link | Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance - link

User avatar
Thanos6
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Deep 13
Contact:

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by Thanos6 » Thu Dec 08, 2016 11:55 am

I can't speak for anyone else, but I won't--can't--accept BOG, Super, Xenoverse, anything like that. It has too many problems for me:

Trying to poorly retcon things from the original continuity; classic characters are portrayed badly or ignored; the new characters are pretty much all unpleasant jackasses who get shilled and worshiped (I remember when characters who blew up planets were the bad guys!).
DragonHermit wrote:...but I just can't accept something like the Trunks outcome. [...] After all he went through, I'd like to think the "hope" in his time machine, wasn't useless. I don't mind darkness, but unnecessary darkness is something else.
This too; Mirai Trunks is probably my favorite character in the whole franchise, so I refuse to settle for him getting anything less than a happy ending. Hell, I'd rather think of him returning to past and settling down in a permanent ménage à trois with Gohan and Videl than what Super or Xenoverse depict.
Trunks & Goten forever

UltimateHammerBro
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1214
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:50 am
Location: Spain

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by UltimateHammerBro » Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:16 pm

Thanos6 wrote:This too; Mirai Trunks is probably my favorite character in the whole franchise, so I refuse to settle for him getting anything less than a happy ending. Hell, I'd rather think of him returning to past and settling down in a permanent ménage à trois with Gohan and Videl than what Super or Xenoverse depict.
I agree that the end of his story arc is a bummer, but you can always imagine that the Future Trunks we've seen in Super comes from yet another alternate timeline, and is not the Future Trunks we remember from DBZ.

The whole Time Ring stuff makes it pretty easy to imagine. There have been previous incursions with time: one of them could have split Super Trunks's timeline from DBZ Trunks's timeline.
I'm a webcomic artist! Check out http://tapastic.com/series/Hearts

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21422
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by Lord Beerus » Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:26 pm

I enjoy it enough that I consider it an extension of the original story. So, yes, I guess it's canon to me.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Should Super be canon in your mind?

Post by precita » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:11 pm

You guys don't get to choose what's canon. Toei and Toriyama consider it canon, so its canon whether you like the show or not.

Post Reply