Jinzoningen MULE wrote:Sure, I didn't phrase that as well as I should have. What I mean is that it wouldn't be identifiable as Dragon Ball, especially so during action sequences. Also, some techniques that are used to create the illusion of speed work better with angular models, Toriyama's modern drawings are round. Granted, this isn't to say that there's no place for roundness in DB, Tate has proven quite the opposite to me. However, Dragon Ball is especially notorious for its angular style and rapid feel, something that Toriyama's new style doesn't compliment.nite_jay wrote:I don't really get what this means. Do you mean that they don't look as menacing or something? Honestly, his old drawing seemed a lot less animation friendly compared to his new ones.Jinzoningen MULE wrote: A lot of people neglect the fact Toriyama's current style would not work nearly as well for combat as his old drawings. However, Yamamuro's aren't animation-friendly either.
That said, they also don't use as many of those old tricks as they used to, so there is definitely an argument to be made for a rounder style, but it isn't the direction that I want out of a modern DB anime.
I'd say that maybe like only about half of Dragonball is actually angular, though; but I don't really think that matters with Super. Its a new show that doesn't really need to try and look like it's predecessors too much. The Boo arc ended like 20 years ago, so I don't know why we need to use the same style but downgraded.



[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]


[/spoiler]




