"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Bullza
Banned
Posts: 8621
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:48 am
Location: UK

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Bullza » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:35 pm

Doctor. wrote:
Bullza wrote:The Genki Dama Sword was bad ass though. It was at least a pretty unique way to go.
It was dumb. I'm glad it's gone.

I just hope this doesn't mean that Trunks is useless for the rest of the arc. Even if done with asspulls, Trunks was pretty useful in the anime. The only useful thing he has done so far in the manga was let Goku and Vegeta escape.
It might not be gone yet. Dumb or not, it was a cool scene in the show and a memorable death for the character. Much better than Goku beating Golden Frieza with a Kamehameha in Resurrection F or Goku ending the fight with Hit....with a Kamehameha (in the manga).

If they're just beaten with some other usual energy wave/spirit bomb again like pretty much every one else then that's far worse.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Beerus » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:36 pm

dbzfan7 wrote:
Doctor. wrote:
Watch him make a Genkidama sword with Vegeta, Goku and Mai's Ki only.
Don't they fucking dare with that garbage. Get that shit outta here.
Do it, Toyotaro. Fucking do it. I want to feed off of the fandom's unfathomable amounts of saltiness and fury. :twisted:

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by dbzfan7 » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:38 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
Doctor. wrote: Watch him make a Genkidama sword with Vegeta, Goku and Mai's Ki only.
Don't they fucking dare with that garbage. Get that shit outta here.
Do it, Toyotaro. Fucking do it. I want to feed off of the fandom's unfathomable amounts of saltiness and fury. :twisted:
FEM....BROLY! :D
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The gr » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:38 pm

Doctor. wrote:
The gr wrote:this is just a speculation
Trunks is going to seal merged zamasu with the mafuba instead of the genkidama sword
I'd hate that. The Mafuba as a concept just isn't a secure way to defeat an opponent. He can get released at any point in the future and then you have to deal with him again.

I'm pretty sure that the Omni-king is going to "take care" of everything just like in the anime, we know there are two Omni-kings in the manga next arc, and it's a big plot point. Seeing as how the Genki sword doesn't seem like a plot point, either Vegetto defuses and they press the button as a last resort, or there's no fusion at all and they just press the button anyway.
What I'm trying to say the mafuba is going to accomplish the same thing as the genkidama sword,by that I mean trunks seal merged zamasu but zamasu escape and turn into cloud and then we see the Zeno button in use
Mostly active on discord.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:39 pm

Doctor. wrote:
The gr wrote:this is just a speculation
Trunks is going to seal merged zamasu with the mafuba instead of the genkidama sword
I'd hate that. The Mafuba as a concept just isn't a secure way to defeat an opponent. He can get released at any point in the future and then you have to deal with him again.

I'm pretty sure that the Omni-king is going to "take care" of everything just like in the anime, we know there are two Omni-kings in the manga next arc, and it's a big plot point. Seeing as how the Genki sword doesn't seem like a plot point, either Vegetto defuses and they press the button as a last resort, or there's no fusion at all and they just press the button anyway.
People vastly overestimate the scope of Toyotaro's changes. Most of what he does is add extra lore, re-arrange the order of events, and cut some fat. Even when he does deviate, it always has the same result. Gowasu will not die in this chapter, Zamasu will fuse, Vegetto will kick his ass a bit, Zeno will erase him, etc.
Retired.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Doctor. » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:39 pm

Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Beerus » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:41 pm

*turns around and puts fingers in both ears and closes eyes*

User avatar
Totamo
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:24 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Totamo » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:41 pm

Maybe toyo shouldn't explain everything that we have questions for.


That being said, trunks is not getting a power up in this manga. the genki dama sword can't happen if they have killed everyone on earth.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:42 pm

Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
I think it's because they don't have Bulma to adjust the settings.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
MathSSJ
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MathSSJ » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 pm

Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
Wasn't it only 8 months? Not sure, but I think this is a plot hole. Granted, minor one, but still.

User avatar
Totamo
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:24 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Totamo » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 pm

Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
time travel creates plotholes even back then with cell.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:44 pm

Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
Yeah. It's kind of weird, but it doesn't actually harm the narrative. I mean, the Androids were taking their sweet time destroying the world, and we know that gathering fuel took ages even back then, so it's believable. In fact, time has always been portrayed as flowing at a consistent 1:1 ratio between timelines now that I think about it, so it really isn't all that strange.
MathSSJ wrote:Wasn't it only 8 months? Not sure, but I think this is a plot hole. Granted, minor one, but still.
Nowhere was it said to be 8 months, no.
Last edited by Jinzoningen MULE on Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Retired.

User avatar
Freeza9000
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 am
Location: Outside of time

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Freeza9000 » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:45 pm

Bullza wrote:
Doctor. wrote:
Bullza wrote:The Genki Dama Sword was bad ass though. It was at least a pretty unique way to go.
It was dumb. I'm glad it's gone.

I just hope this doesn't mean that Trunks is useless for the rest of the arc. Even if done with asspulls, Trunks was pretty useful in the anime. The only useful thing he has done so far in the manga was let Goku and Vegeta escape.
It might not be gone yet. Dumb or not, it was a cool scene in the show and a memorable death for the character. Much better than Goku beating Golden Frieza with a Kamehameha in Resurrection F or Goku ending the fight with Hit....with a Kamehameha (in the manga
This memorable death didn't happen, now did it?

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Doctor. » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:45 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
Yeah. It's kind of weird, but it doesn't actually harm the narrative. I mean, the Androids were taking their sweet time destroying the world, and we know that gathering fuel took ages even back then, so it's believable. In fact, time has always been portrayed as flowing at a consistent 1:1 ratio between timelines now that I think about it, so it really isn't all that strange.
Not saying it's strange, just making sure there wasn't a time frame stated in the manga for how long Trunks took. And it makes future Trunks a bit older than I thought he was.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:50 pm

Doctor. wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
Yeah. It's kind of weird, but it doesn't actually harm the narrative. I mean, the Androids were taking their sweet time destroying the world, and we know that gathering fuel took ages even back then, so it's believable. In fact, time has always been portrayed as flowing at a consistent 1:1 ratio between timelines now that I think about it, so it really isn't all that strange.
Not saying it's strange, just making sure there wasn't a time frame stated in the manga for how long Trunks took. And it makes future Trunks a bit older than I thought he was.
Actually, I just checked my manga, and there is a line from Bulma in Trunks' epilogue that goes something like "Have you gotten taller?". This could imply that he was a teenager before going in the RoSaT, meaning that it wouldn't have been 3 years. However, there's no concrete line, so it's a soft contradiction at worst. Toriyama has never been the best at remembering time, either, so we could even write it off as a mistake on his end.

Take your pick.
Retired.

User avatar
MathSSJ
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MathSSJ » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:51 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
MathSSJ wrote:Wasn't it only 8 months? Not sure, but I think this is a plot hole. Granted, minor one, but still.
Nowhere was it said to be 8 months, no.
I see, thanks for the correction.

User avatar
Totamo
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:24 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Totamo » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:53 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Doctor. wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Yeah. It's kind of weird, but it doesn't actually harm the narrative. I mean, the Androids were taking their sweet time destroying the world, and we know that gathering fuel took ages even back then, so it's believable. In fact, time has always been portrayed as flowing at a consistent 1:1 ratio between timelines now that I think about it, so it really isn't all that strange.
Not saying it's strange, just making sure there wasn't a time frame stated in the manga for how long Trunks took. And it makes future Trunks a bit older than I thought he was.
Actually, I just checked my manga, and there is a line from Bulma in Trunks' epilogue that goes something like "Have you gotten taller?". This could imply that he was a teenager before going in the RoSaT, meaning that it wouldn't have been 3 years. However, there's no concrete line, so it's a soft contradiction at worst. Toriyama has never been the best at remembering time, either, so we could even write it off as a mistake on his end.

Take your pick.
either way, time travel is a convolution and should have never been taken on by a man who goes with the flow.

User avatar
TheUltimateNinja
I Live Here
Posts: 4020
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:17 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by TheUltimateNinja » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:56 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Wait, so did Trunks wait 3 years in the future before coming back to fight the androids or what? Because that's what this chapter makes us believe.
Yeah. It's kind of weird, but it doesn't actually harm the narrative. I mean, the Androids were taking their sweet time destroying the world, and we know that gathering fuel took ages even back then, so it's believable. In fact, time has always been portrayed as flowing at a consistent 1:1 ratio between timelines now that I think about it, so it really isn't all that strange.
MathSSJ wrote:Wasn't it only 8 months? Not sure, but I think this is a plot hole. Granted, minor one, but still.
Nowhere was it said to be 8 months, no.
Wasn't it stated that it took 8 months to gather the fuel? Though I suppose that doesn't necessarily imply that Trunks immediately decided to get going once he had the necessary fuel. But I believe Trunks definitely would have finished puberty if he spent a full 3 years in the future, so I'm inclined to believe that he only stayed in the future for 8 months after all.

Also, I was under the impression that Trunks was taking his sweet time in the present world since he could go back to his timeline with barely any time having passed there, but apparently this is not the case.

User avatar
Draconic
I Live Here
Posts: 2096
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:44 pm
Location: Romania

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Draconic » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:59 pm

Trunks might learn the Genki Dama from the Kaioshin, or something like that. There must be a reason they meet, so I guess that might be it? Maybe they are also going to stay in the present (if they even are in the present) so that's where the energy would come from.

Of course this is all twisting stuff. Trunks isn't shown having a connection to anyone outside of Mai so the moment would hold zero weight, regardless if it's explained well.

Gowasu's death has no impact, since we know Rumoosh has to be alive in the next arc (though I don't put it against Toyotaro, it's not his fault we know this).

The Time Travel stuff Bulma explains is really unnecessary. I don't think it's making the situation any more tense than it already is, so it just feels out of place. I'm fine with retcons, but if they have a purpose at least. Guess we'll have to wait and see what this is all about in future chapters.

Art is pretty conservative. Guess after two action packed chapters it's understadable.

The worst thing of it all is I really can't see how Trunks could help with anything in this whole ordeal, unless he uses the Mafuba like in the anime and that's again, not leading to much, since at the end his timeline still has to be wiped in order for the second Zeno to come to ours. I mean, alright, the villain of the arc is half assed, but does the protagonist have to be too?
Check out the videos below, made by yours truly!

Goku vs Beerus BOG/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/kKKnMe

Vegeta vs Freeza ROF/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/MKPepW

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Beerus » Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:03 pm

According to Herms from the chapter:
Goku learns the Mafuba without the aid of Sea Turtle in this version.
That seriously sucks. And it kinda makes no sense. Who the hell taught Goku how to do the Mafuba? And even if you mention the fact that he was told about this by Roshi at some point, this begs the question, why did Goku never think about using the technique when he was told about it? Did Kami teach him? Or maybe Piccolo? Because him learning on his own with no explanation of how the technique actually work sounds a little ass-pullish.

EDIT: Never mind. Had a brain fart and read Sea Turtle as Turtle Hermit.
Last edited by Lord Beerus on Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply