"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8324
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:05 pm

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
mfwlegend3 wrote:
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:How many panels does Vegetto get then? Also did Trunks use the same Spirit Sword as the anime?
From what I saw, Vegetto appears, goes blue, attempts to fire Final Kamehameha, and defuses.
Please tell me that is a joke? Or incomplete scans? What the Hell...!
Oh, what's the matter Baggie_Saiyan? Don't tell me you're upset? Isn't you that always talk like Super as a flawless masterpiece and its issues regarding power scaling and plot consistency can always be justified because these same issues were present in Z?
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Tsufuru wrote:this is so boring tbh.
this manga is unnecessery as hell.
You're free to stop reading if you don't like it. Some of us appreciate the alternative take.
How is that is any "alternative"? It's the same sh** plot we got in the anime full of dumb retcons but this time worse with Future Trunks managing to defeat Merged Zamasu without his random rage transformation.
LightBing wrote: Panels that are copied from the original manga. This chapter we have a reference to the Cell Arc, when Vegeta obliterated half of Cell's body with the Final Flash.
Also Merged Zamasu with a hole in his chest isn't a reference to something in Boo arc? I don't remember now :think:
Legion wrote:[spoiler]ImageImage
[img]http://i.imgur.com/7ttQjaW.jpg[/img[/spoiler]
I gotta admit: I was expecting Gogeta, but Vegetto looks pretty cool.
Last edited by Noah on Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Basako
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1008
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Basako » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:06 pm

zamasu121 wrote:
Basako wrote:
zamasu121 wrote:
Gowasu says that he promotes Zamasu temporarily and he gives him the potara, go read it for yourself if you don't believe me.
Ok, let's analize it. I only have mangastream version.

He says first: "Originally only supreme kais were meant to travel into the future using the time ring." So why does he say originally if it's a unbrakeable law?

Then he says: "But we can make a special exception in this case. For the time being I temporary raise your status to that of supreme Kai. " It could be a way to make it 'by the rules' but he is not a full kaioshin, not that he needs to be indispensably to use the ring.

Look, just trying to explain it. Black is not a kaioshin and if future Zamasu is, where is Rumosh?
when future Gowasu died so did he.
And you're suggesting Zamasu is a Kaioshin without a Hakaishin? You don't see any problem in that? Well, I do. There's no one without the other, as far as we know.
Heno heno kappa!

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by OLKv3 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:10 pm

SansrivaaL wrote:
OLKv3 wrote: He didn't do that against Boo. When Boo had them overwhelmed, he fused. He didn't do it against Kid Buu because he thought he could win 1v1. He later regretted it and was saying he should have fused.
Goku has pride and loves fighting, but he never put it ahead of surviving.
No that was the anime version or probably dub, in the original manga he never once mentioned that he thought he could win, he even said he didnt want to fuse because Vegeta wouldnt want to as well anyways and claims thats not how they do things, true he did regret it but that doesnt mean he was gonna fuse with him if given the chance, its just his thought that if they fused they coulda won easily, I dont see Goku as someone who prioritizes surviving, he himself didnt want to return back to the living. Theres a reason why he didnt resort to fusing with Vegeta. The first time was probably special maybe because he wanted to experience fusion and wanted to feel its power, he was curious at the time, now he isnt so much, he just gave it a thought that "lets fuse too?" and when turned down he went with the flow of "ok, theres probably another way to beat him anyways" more so if he already knew Zamasu has a timelimit as well.
He mentioned it in the manga. The only reason he didn't fuse was because Boo wasn't fused either and he thought he could win.
[spoiler]Image
Image[/spoiler]
Last edited by OLKv3 on Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
MisteryOne
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1006
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:27 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MisteryOne » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:10 pm

Noah wrote:
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
mfwlegend3 wrote:From what I saw, Vegetto appears, goes blue, attempts to fire Final Kamehameha, and defuses.
Please tell me that is a joke? Or incomplete scans? What the Hell...!
Oh, what's the matter Baggie_Saiyan? Don't tell me you're upset? Isn't you that always talk like Super as a flawless masterpiece and its issues regarding power scaling and plot consistency can always be justified because these same issues were present in Z?
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Tsufuru wrote:this is so boring tbh.
this manga is unnecessery as hell.
You're free to stop reading if you don't like it. Some of us appreciate the alternative take.
How is that is any "alternative"? It's the same sh** plot we got in the anime full of dumb retcons but this time worse with Future Trunks managing to defeat Merged Zamasu without his random rage transformation.
LightBing wrote: Panels that are copied from the original manga. This chapter we have a reference to the Cell Arc, when Vegeta obliterated half of Cell's body with the Final Flash.
Also Merged Zamasu with a hole in his chest isn't a reference to something in Boo arc? I don't remember now :think:
Legion wrote:[spoiler]ImageImage
[img]http://i.imgur.com/7ttQjaW.jpg[/img[/spoiler]
I gotta admit: I was expecting Gogeta, but Vegetto looks pretty cool.
When did Trunks defeat Merged Zamasu in this chapter?
English is not my first language. Please excuse my gramatical mistakes.

zamasu121
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by zamasu121 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:14 pm

Basako wrote:
zamasu121 wrote:
Basako wrote:
Ok, let's analize it. I only have mangastream version.

He says first: "Originally only supreme kais were meant to travel into the future using the time ring." So why does he say originally if it's a unbrakeable law?

Then he says: "But we can make a special exception in this case. For the time being I temporary raise your status to that of supreme Kai. " It could be a way to make it 'by the rules' but he is not a full kaioshin, not that he needs to be indispensably to use the ring.

Look, just trying to explain it. Black is not a kaioshin and if future Zamasu is, where is Rumosh?
when future Gowasu died so did he.
And you're suggesting Zamasu is a Kaioshin without a Hakaishin? You don't see any problem in that? Well, I do. There's no one without the other, as far as we know.
Yes thats what I'm saying, they never said that if a god of destruction dies the kaioshin also dies, though they are implying that one can't live without the other.

User avatar
mfwlegend3
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:00 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by mfwlegend3 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:16 pm

Toyotaro back at it again with the "homages" in this chapter... lol

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8673
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Grimlock » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:16 pm

zamasu121 wrote:though they are implying that one can't live without the other.
Where are they implying that? The only thing we know is that if a Hakaishin dies, his angel gets deactivated. There's no mention about what happens to Kaioshins.

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by OLKv3 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:17 pm

So this is the panel he was talking about
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8324
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:17 pm

MisteryOne wrote:When did Trunks defeat Merged Zamasu in this chapter?
Mate, if you're going only to awnser one setence of what I just said you can erase the rest. It's not that hard to edit your own posts. Please, avoid derrailing the thread and get users with unnecessary double notifications.

About your question:
mfwlegend3 wrote:I've read enough raws to know it's mainly the same as what went down in the anime.

Trunks taking the final kill will be even more retarded now, because he doesn't have SSRage.
Last edited by Noah on Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

FireFly
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:36 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by FireFly » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:18 pm

Image

Image

^those are practically tracing lmao

This is pretty much copied from Freeza's pose when he detonates Namek too

[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

User avatar
Freeza9000
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 am
Location: Outside of time

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Freeza9000 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:20 pm

FireFly wrote:Image

Image

^those are practically tracing lmao

This is pretty much copied from Freeza's pose when he detonates Namek too

[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]
Seems like Goomasu won't appear in the manga after all.

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8324
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:20 pm

FireFly wrote:^those are practically tracing lmao

This is pretty much copied from Freeza's pose when he detonates Namek too
People praises Toyotaro even though he is a bad writer and lacks creativity
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
MyNiggaGoku
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 1:02 pm
Location: Zen-chan's bedroom

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MyNiggaGoku » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:23 pm

Noah wrote:
FireFly wrote:^those are practically tracing lmao

This is pretty much copied from Freeza's pose when he detonates Namek too
People praises Toyotaro even though he is a bad writer and lacks creativity
People praise Toyotaro because they have a different opinion from you.
Last edited by MyNiggaGoku on Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Dragon Ball Super 'Canon'

User avatar
Ki Breaker
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:15 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Ki Breaker » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:23 pm

Zamasu isn't losing his regeneration to a huge degree here, that's good to know..
Really dislike giant bio broly zamasu
The Lord moves in mysterious ways but you don't have to. Please use your blinker

User avatar
Totamo
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:24 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Totamo » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:24 pm

Can Toyo not draw necks?


Oh, I guess I was wrong. i really thought he go the Gogeta route oh well. I underestimated Toyotaro. The one hour rule is still in. Alright, I guess this mean Tori wants to be done with fusion because there is no reason to use it now.


I didn't give a shit when it happened in the anime, same in the manga.

What is not alright is Zamasu having that same weakness. Black is not very strong in this manga. There is nothing to fear from him.


Trunks also can't be useful here without some weird ass powerup that will now seem out of nowhere even more so than the anime.



Toyotaro may have just made this a whole lot worse.

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8324
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:25 pm

MyNiggaGoku wrote:People praise Toyotaro because they have a different opinion from you.
Than you* and I'm not attacking these people, in fact want to see what they have to say about it
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Freeza9000
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 am
Location: Outside of time

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Freeza9000 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:26 pm

Ki Breaker wrote:Zamasu isn't losing his regeneration to a huge degree here, that's good to know..
Really dislike giant bio broly zamasu
Nah, I really am a fan of the Mutated Zamasu design.

User avatar
emperior
I Live Here
Posts: 4347
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Dragon World
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by emperior » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:27 pm

Are you guys seriously upset by the fact Vegetto defuses in the manga too? Are you really upset, once again, by the retcon?
Noah wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Tsufuru wrote:this is so boring tbh.
this manga is unnecessery as hell.
You're free to stop reading if you don't like it. Some of us appreciate the alternative take.
How is that is any "alternative"? It's the same sh** plot we got in the anime full of dumb retcons but this time worse with Future Trunks managing to defeat Merged Zamasu without his random rage transformation.
I always see you complaining about Super in every single possible way, why are you even watching it if it's so shit for you?
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

What I consider canonical

User avatar
Ki Breaker
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:15 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Ki Breaker » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:28 pm

Freeza9000 wrote:
Ki Breaker wrote:Zamasu isn't losing his regeneration to a huge degree here, that's good to know..
Really dislike giant bio broly zamasu
Nah, I really am a fan of the Mutated Zamasu design.
That's cool, we both get our versions
The Lord moves in mysterious ways but you don't have to. Please use your blinker

User avatar
mfwlegend3
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:00 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by mfwlegend3 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:30 pm

Super in general has become absolute shit. Anime and the manga both.

I can tell it would have been worse if Toriyama did the manga, too.. That's a scary thought.

Post Reply