We know for a fact that he can still use it before ROF, not during or after it. That's a claim, regardless of how much well-thought or grounded you think it is since "this" or "that" happened before. The excerpt, which is meant to clarify things pertaining to the time the ROF movie takes place, states that if Goku tried after becoming godly-empowered he'd turn Blue. Again, if you take the article word-per-word, it means that something has changed in-between.The article states is that Saiyans with the power of Super Saiyan God awaken the power of Super Saiyan Blue when they become Super Saiyan. I'm not contradicting anything. Did Goku go Super Saiyan in BOG? Yes he did, so he can still use it. The ki was already entirely his own when he absorbed it. All he did afterwards was train to master his ki so it never leaked, which was shown to invoke SSB.
If using SSB requires your ki to not leak in addition to using God's power as a Super Saiyan, then if your ki is leaking, the result of the power will not be SSB if you become a Super Saiyan. With all of this taken into account, is the blurb wrong? No. Super Saiyan Blue is still becoming a Super Saiyan under Super Saiyan God's power. The basic Super Saiyan is still accessible as shown in the series.
Super Saiyan being accessible to Goku normally is shown in Super, which has its own continuity. You can't retroactively apply it to confirm something for everyone else. It's fine if you want to believe the article doesn't reflect the truth because of what's shown in Super.
It is, according to the booklet, unless you theorize Goku isn't his "godly powered" self at all times. BOG and Dragon Ball Super are not necessarily related to what's happening in the ROF movie like you're claiming. I'm basically rewording this in a different manner every time because you are simply repeating yourself.When Goku is shown using Super Saiyan after absorbing God power during BOG and all throughout Super, then Super Saiyan disappearing forever obviously isn't the intention and it doesn't matter what you think the statement should logically mean in this case. It's not outright stated that Super Saiyan is inaccessible and Goku is shown using it during BOG and Super.
Pardon me? This whole debate is ENTIRELY you boxing with what the article is saying, and in layman's terms; if anything, I'm acting as an intermediator here.I acknowledged the article already so lets stop with the strawmans, since you can't actually counter anything that I've said.




