So I see there's been a lot of "passionate" reactions to Goku's and Vegeta's behavior in this new chapter. So I decided to do some digging of what the big ruckus was about and I come across this from Herms:
Goku reveals he didn't know about Gohan or Goten's births. Vegeta: "You might not be a bad guy, but as a father, you're the worst."
Yeah... that is...
absolutely fucking absurd.
Not the just the fact that Goku was wasn't around for Gohan birth, but the fact that Vegeta, the same Vegeta who was willing to left his wife and infant child die in a plane and never hugged his son until he was 8 years old and was about to kill himself, is taking the high morale ground and calling out Goku for how he acts as father is gear grindingly hypocritical.
This is far from a story breaking thing for me, but damn if it's a really unnecessarily annoying addition to the story from Toyotaro. Just like how Goku never kissed his wife. Frankly I find this occasion worse than the whole "Goku never kissing Chi Chi" scenario because it was handled with far less subtlety. I mean.... where the hell
was Goku when Gohan was being born?! Did Goku even
know when Chi Chi was pregnant? It's just so fucking dumb. It raises more questions that it needs to.
And keep in mind while Bulma is heavily pregnant, Vegeta is off in some far region of the universe training with Whis. Shouldn't
he be sticking around for the birth of his child, which could happen very soon, to, you know, at least have
some kind of moral ground for calling out Goku on being absent for the birth of his children?
Ugh. This was all so bloody freakin stupid. It won't detract from the grand scope of the story in the slightest, but... did we really need to know
this?