"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:13 pm

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
Dbzfan94 wrote:
HeroR wrote: For reference:

Best Characters
1.Son Goku: 6,235 points
2.Vegeta: 2,527 points
3.Son Gohan: 2,131 points
4.Trunks: 1,487 points
5.Piccolo: 1,176 points
6.Son Goten: 798 points
7.Kuririn: 736 points
8.Majin Buu: 421 points
9.Freeza: 324 points
10.Android No.18: 204 points
11.Mister Satan: 201 points
12.Karin-sama: 185
13.Kame-sennin: 172 points
14.Cell: 170 points
15.Yamcha: 163 points
16.Tenshinhan: 125
17.Bulma: 112 points
18.Android No.17: 98 points
19.Yajirobe: 93 points
20.Videl: 86 points
This poll is interesting; people always say that Goten isn't popular but he's #6 which surprises me. Plus I'm guessing they count Present/Future Trunks as one which explains him at #4
This poll was done way back when the Buu arc was fresh-er then it was now coupled with the fact Goten looks and acts like Goku so it isn't that surprising. He is I think the worst character that Toriyama ever came up with, at least in EoZ Goten showed hints of being an actual character but sadly EoZ wasn't that long.
This poll is from Dragon Ball Forever, which was 2004. The Buu Saga ended around 1995-96. So the Buu Saga would only be 'fresh' in the way that it was the last story arc of Z.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by precita » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:20 pm

I'm not sure why that surprises people. Trunks and Goten were treated as major characters in the Buu arc, plus they got focus in Movies 10-13, so of course they were popular at the time.

It's only that Super's portrayal of Trunks and Goten is SO BAD that people forget they used to be popular. Same reason the 2008 special was dedicated to Trunks and Goten.

Jigurashi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1176
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 2:57 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Jigurashi » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:29 pm

Michsi wrote:
emperior wrote:There must be a reason why so many fans still love Piccolo.
Yeah, he was friggin' fantastic in Z. He was an amazing villain in DB too.

I just started watching random fights from the Android/Cell saga and I got to his first encounter with Cell. The sense of relevance his character used to have and the importance Toei gave his scenes....it makes me want to start gnawing on my keyboard in frustration when I see his role in Super. :(

He will always be pretty popular for this franchise, but yeah, if he keeps getting scraps things aren't looking great for him.
Eh. He had a great fight against Goku in the 23rd Budokai but he really wasn't anything special as a villain in DB as a whole imo.

User avatar
ArchedThunder
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5718
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by ArchedThunder » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:36 pm

perucho1990 wrote:
Ken Xyro @KenXyro
Possible spoilers about new form:

It involves awakening the original "brutal and cruel" Saiyan genes.

Take this with a grain of salt.
If this becomes true, then it would be a good chance to explain SSJ Ikari or Berserker form, could be related to it.
Where is this rumor coming from and where did the rumor GohitaAF posted come from? 2ch?

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8345
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:41 pm

precita wrote:It's only that Super's portrayal of Trunks and Goten is SO BAD that people forget they used to be popular. Same reason the 2008 special was dedicated to Trunks and Goten.
They are bad mainly because the writters don't know what to do with them, I thought Super would be interesting too see characters aging until EoZ, especially the kids, something like this:

Image

Credits goes to Kaboom
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:He is I think the worst character that Toriyama ever came up with, at least in EoZ Goten showed hints of being an actual character but sadly EoZ wasn't that long.
Wouldn't you think GT Goten was also his own character? :)
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?


User avatar
BlueBasilisk
I Live Here
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by BlueBasilisk » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:54 pm

I am super suspicious of that "Vegeta has a tail" business. Sounds a lot like SS4 wishful thinking to me.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8695
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Grimlock » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:00 pm

Noah wrote: [spoiler]Image)[/spoiler]
Whenever I see that image, I'm filled with sadness and feel a great pity for Dragon Ball Super, Goten, Trunks and Marron. Why can't everyone do the right thing with them? :(
Last edited by Grimlock on Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8345
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:00 pm

I would love if the Saiyans got their tails back, but this of course would contradict EoZ and GT, but it's not like Super care about that :D
Grimlock wrote:Whenever I see that image, I'm filled with sadness and feel a great pity for Dragon Ball Super and Goten and Trunks. Why can't everyone do the right thing with them? :(
I have this same question too, Why keep it in the confort zone? Their current design are appealing to the kids audience, that's why Toriyama/Toyotaro/Toei show disinterest in aging them show disinterest
Last edited by Noah on Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8695
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Grimlock » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:01 pm

Oh, by the way Marron is 9, not 10.

EDIT: Actually Goten and Trunks are also one year younger than what the image tells us.
Last edited by Grimlock on Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
shadowmaria
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:35 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by shadowmaria » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:07 pm

Noah wrote:I would love if the Saiyans got their tails back, but this of course would contradict EoZ and GT, but it's not like Super care about that :D
Out of curiosity, what is it in Super that has contradicted the EoZ aside from the five years line, and Vegeta knowing about Uub years in advance?

User avatar
TheOne
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 943
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheOne » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:44 pm

Honestly? I wouldn't be too surprised if that were that case. Seeing as how Goku was been portrayed as "evil" at the beginning, it'd fit I suppose.
How i predict the tournament will end:

User avatar
Simere
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 6:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Simere » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:05 pm

TheOne wrote:
Honestly? I wouldn't be too surprised if that were that case. Seeing as how Goku was been portrayed as "evil" at the beginning, it'd fit I suppose.
Assuming the supposed leaks true, that stuff about genes was said about Vegeta; Xyro's reason for connecting it to Goku's form has almost no basis.

User avatar
Hawk9211
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 812
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 11:23 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Hawk9211 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:13 pm

BlueBasilisk wrote:I am super suspicious of that "Vegeta has a tail" business. Sounds a lot like SS4 wishful thinking to me.
Nooo,I always hated tails.Good thing toei and toriyama are lazy 8)
Why power levels are important?
The genre and roots of dragon ball

User avatar
shadowmaria
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:35 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by shadowmaria » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:18 pm

Simere wrote:
TheOne wrote:
Honestly? I wouldn't be too surprised if that were that case. Seeing as how Goku was been portrayed as "evil" at the beginning, it'd fit I suppose.
Assuming the supposed leaks true, that stuff about genes was said about Vegeta; Xyro's reason for connecting it to Goku's form has almost no basis.
I haven't been able to locate the leaks. Are you able to provide a link? I'd love a read of them, if only for a laugh.

Remember that the last few months, leaks have risen before any scans, and some things have proven to be true

User avatar
Simere
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 6:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Simere » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:30 pm

shadowmaria wrote:
Simere wrote:Assuming the supposed leaks true, that stuff about genes was said about Vegeta; Xyro's reason for connecting it to Goku's form has almost no basis.
I haven't been able to locate the leaks. Are you able to provide a link? I'd love a read of them, if only for a laugh.

Remember that the last few months, leaks have risen before any scans, and some things have proven to be true
Psykomatik has the link to the 2ch thread where they came from, and translated a few snippets. I haven't seen anyone else bother to translate it all.

User avatar
shadowmaria
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:35 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by shadowmaria » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:37 pm

Simere wrote:
shadowmaria wrote:
Simere wrote:Assuming the supposed leaks true, that stuff about genes was said about Vegeta; Xyro's reason for connecting it to Goku's form has almost no basis.
I haven't been able to locate the leaks. Are you able to provide a link? I'd love a read of them, if only for a laugh.

Remember that the last few months, leaks have risen before any scans, and some things have proven to be true
Psykomatik has the link to the 2ch thread where they came from, and translated a few snippets. I haven't seen anyone else bother to translate it all.
Thanks for that :)

User avatar
alakazam^
I Live Here
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:55 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by alakazam^ » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:46 pm

Simere wrote:
shadowmaria wrote:
Simere wrote:Assuming the supposed leaks true, that stuff about genes was said about Vegeta; Xyro's reason for connecting it to Goku's form has almost no basis.
I haven't been able to locate the leaks. Are you able to provide a link? I'd love a read of them, if only for a laugh.

Remember that the last few months, leaks have risen before any scans, and some things have proven to be true
Psykomatik has the link to the 2ch thread where they came from, and translated a few snippets. I haven't seen anyone else bother to translate it all.
I'm not sure if it's said user's expectations but, regardless, no one in that thread is talking about it so I would just ignore the "leaks". They don't make sense anyway.

User avatar
Ki Breaker
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:15 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Ki Breaker » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:53 am

Vegeta transforms into a something screaming SS4 and being stronger than Goku, then Goku transforms into a Neko Saiyan right after?
Yeah.. no.. this seems more like a Vegeta fan trying to make his SS4 and stonger than Goku wishes come true..
The Lord moves in mysterious ways but you don't have to. Please use your blinker

User avatar
Yomi
Regular
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:45 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Yomi » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:05 am

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
kinisking wrote:Y'all still looking at percentages and thinking you know how the audience feels about the episode ? Really ?
At this point, I just like to believe the fanbase is parodying itself... I have never been part of such a ridiculous fanbase in my life, sub vs dub, Kai dub vs Z that is all nothing compared to what I have witnessed since Super. I have been part of the problem too for sure especially at the start but then one day I came to stark realisation, I pray one day a majority of the fan base have a similar epiphany.
It only gets ridiculous when they say stuff like. "Low ratings this week, guess the Japanese fans didn't like [insert plot point that that you would had to have watched the episode to see]"
:clap:

Post Reply