Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:20 pm

PsionicWarrior wrote:
TheMikado wrote:Nothing Toriyama has said implies GT is "non-canon" as in the events never happened in-universe,
No but he wrote BoG and Super which acts as if GT never existed lol
TheMikado wrote:Toriyama said it's a continuation of Dragonball.
PsionicWarrior wrote:Yet again I don't get why you think the author acknowledging the work of others would have the same canonical value as if he was the one writing it lol
A fan-fiction validated by original author still is a fan-fiction lol
Toriyama did not rewrite or conceive BoG. The entire script was already written when they gave it to him.
Toriyama rewrote and re-envisioned it. The concepts of Gods, Super Saiyan God, Gods of Destruction were all Toei's ideas NOT Toriyama's.
Have you even read the production history of this or do you just parrot whatever you read on the internet?

You are telling me it doesn't hold the same canonical "value". What does that even mean???? Does it matter who writes the Star Wars movies to give them canonical "value" or if a story it said to be a continuation does that make it "canon" i.e. it actually happened. You are arguing on an abstract of canonical value without any definition of what it is or who adheres to or acknowledges such a concept in DB because as it looks now the author surely doesn't hold your view on this. I wonder who's opinion hold more weight on this topic between the two of you... :think:

You can argue with me all day, but you can't argue with Toriyama's own words if you want to debate canon.

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:19 pm

sigh lol

It literally makes no sense for Toriyama to consider GT as a continuation since there is BoG and Super which ARE the actual continuations, you're isolating a vague quote from some PR interview to reinforce your opinion because you WANT GT to be canon even though Toriyama didn't write even a sentence in it, come on mate that's not very honest is it lol
Furthermore you are trying to belittle his work in BoG which was major (and one awesome movie), GT would most likely have had a better reception than it did had he done the same cheers lol

And yes, in the same fashion what was created by Georges Lucas is canon to Star Wars so we keep even more right on topic lol

User avatar
Cetra
I Live Here
Posts: 3855
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by Cetra » Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:33 pm

Do you really think ending every line with a "lol" makes for a good argument? That being said you are not using a single one of your posts to explain something with how canonicity actually works. What you are saying is not how it works. I said it often enough and will say it often enough again, canonicity is not defined by "it is made by the author" or "it is in the manga" or "it is logically consistent" or "it does not suck". Those are fan-made-up rules. The reason why an author normally can declare a canonicity is because this is all about property and an author normally owns a brand through the mere fact that he is the author. In Dragon Ball's case there are multiple owners and there are also franchises were the author/creator/inventor is no longer an owner thus cannot decide.
PsionicWarrior wrote: And yes, in the same fashion what was created by Georges Lucas is canon to Star Wars so we keep even more right on topic lol
That is wrong. First of all Star Wars 1-6 were not written by George Lucas alone and second that stuff is only canonical because Disney respects that work that much. Disney as the actual owner of the franchise with George Lucas no longer being the owner has the power to overwrite whatever he made and thus make it non-canonical. Own the brand, own the rights. If you want power, get the rights. And Disney could retcon as much as they want just as they did with the Legends universe. They just would not do that but they have all the creative power over it so they could totally rewrite it from scratch. If I invent something and give decisive power to you I cannot claim that you cannot do something with it and if I do not even have any decisive power left I cannot be said to be someone who has a say in things when others actually have.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy

feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:49 pm

For sure something canonical can suck or be inconsistent I never said anything against that, I understand you believe all goes down to the IP owner no matter any factor directly relevant to the actual creation, to each his own.

User avatar
gofishus
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 2:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by gofishus » Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:44 pm

I find the whole canon vs non-canon argument to be really lame, especially since in Super we have TWO different and distinct canons: the Anime canon and the Manga canon. So which is the "true" canon??
I don't find myself dismissing any DBZ movies or DBGT just because someone else on the internet thinks "BUT ITS NOT CANON SO IT SUCKS!!111" I find enjoyment based on whether or not I personally enjoy the series or not.

DBGT is better for me. Number one is the animation style which is more similar to DBZ. the old 90s anime have a distinct style that changed, and Super artistic style feels way too "cute" or "childish" for me. Its missing the "grittiness" of DBZ/DBGT.

Secondly, while DBGT has inconsistent power levels, its nowhere near the clusterf*ck of power scaling that Super is. You're telling me that SSJ2 Trunks is as powerful as someone with God Ki? You're telling me that Android 17 within the span of a few months (because we all know he didnt do sh*t in Buu Arc) got to God tier level? You're telling me Master Roshi is suddenly one of the most powerful characters? Gimme a break. DBGT never had those kind of situations.

Thirdly, I find SSJ4 to be the most original super saiyan transformation period. No color swap of the hair, just purely original. Nice.

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by TheMikado » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:46 pm

PsionicWarrior wrote:For sure something canonical can suck or be inconsistent I never said anything against that, I understand you believe all goes down to the IP owner no matter any factor directly relevant to the actual creation, to each his own.
Regardless of how you want to to put, no authoritative body has ever stated GT is not canon and seperate from the main timeline. The fact is Toriyama has stated it is a continuation of Dragonball and Toei still has GT in their official timeline even with Super. The Who, what, where, whys don't matter the fact is everyone that actually matters and have an opinion on this have deemed GT as part of that main franchise timeline. This is indisputably.

If you have a problem with it or counter opinion, take it up with Toriyama and Toei.

BWri
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by BWri » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:41 pm

TheMikado wrote:If he "checks" the anime/manga production he doesn't care much about what goes in it.

There's no way around rationalizing it: either he doesn't care enough about Super to check what's being made, or he doesn't care enough about what's being made to check on Super.
I think he cares, just not as much as the fans do. He doesn't have the same passion as say Oda or Kishimoto, but I think he cares.
Big fan of the characters of Dragon Ball, all of them, especially formerly prominent sub-characters. -__-

BWri
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by BWri » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:57 pm

sintzu wrote:
Analytical Delusion wrote:Arcs seem to be structured a bit differently. I believe Toriyama was writing by the seat of his pants during the original serialization.

The two movie adaptation were written for hour-long presentations, rather than dozens of episode. neither makes for a good major plot in a series.
This alongside the fact that he was the only person working on it and was doing what he thought would make fro a good story. Now he's working with other writers and has to answer to multiple companies that each have different expectations form him and the franchise.
The main difference between then and now is that Toriyama had editors to reign him in back then. I think that's what Super is missing lol. The tension is missing because Toriyama doesn't have his real life villainous editors watching from over his shoulder :lol:
Big fan of the characters of Dragon Ball, all of them, especially formerly prominent sub-characters. -__-

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by sintzu » Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:16 pm

BWri wrote:
TheMikado wrote:If he "checks" the anime/manga production he doesn't care much about what goes in it.

There's no way around rationalizing it: either he doesn't care enough about Super to check what's being made, or he doesn't care enough about what's being made to check on Super.
I think he cares, just not as much as the fans do. He doesn't have the same passion as say Oda or Kishimoto, but I think he cares.
With the anime, it's out of his hands due to him not running Toei. Same thing with Toyotarou, as much as he tries to do what Toriyama wants he still won't do what would've been done if Toriyama worked on it simply because he's a different person.

In terms of comparing him to Oda and Kishimoto, I think it's unfair cause unlike them and himself when he worked on the original manga, he's not the one calling the shots now, it's the companies (especially Bandai) involved with the franchise. A great example of this is when he talked about the Zamasu arc cause he said it was a suggestion from the editorial office, not something he himself came up with. If Bandai wants to sell some evil Goku figures then it's up to him to make it happen and if he can't then someone else will. Remember back in 2014 when he said Goku would just use Ssj1 moving forward ? Ssjs sell too well so that idea went out the window.

Back when he worked on the manga however, he only answered to his editor who only expected one thing from him, to sell the story. how it was done was completely up to him. As long as the manga sold and as long as people liked it, he was doing a grade A job, same thing with the 2 authors you brought up. Boruto's manga is in a similar position to DB's, they spent the last 3 chapters or so promoting a new card game that Bandai wants to make and sell. It doesn't matter that it made 0 sense within the context of the story, if the sponsor wants something, they get it or else they pull their $$$. When One Piece is all said and done, it'll most likely be the greatest written story in all of fiction so everyone involved with it will want it to continue beyond Oda's ending and like DB and Naruto, whoever works on it will have to do what they think will sell, regardless of it making for a good story or living up to what came before it.
BWri wrote:The main difference between then and now is that Toriyama had editors to reign him in back then. I think that's what Super is missing lol. The tension is missing because Toriyama doesn't have his real life villainous editors watching from over his shoulder :lol:
He has worse, Bandai's stock holders.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

BWri
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by BWri » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:54 am

sintzu wrote: With the anime, it's out of his hands due to him not running Toei. Same thing with Toyotarou, as much as he tries to do what Toriyama wants he still won't do what would've been done if Toriyama worked on it simply because he's a different person.
Toyotarou is in a very limited situation, but Toriyama can do whatever he wants as far as I understand. If he wanted, I'm sure Toei would allow him a more hands-on role.
In terms of comparing him to Oda and Kishimoto, I think it's unfair cause unlike them and himself when he worked on the original manga, he's not the one calling the shots now, it's the companies (especially Bandai) involved with the franchise. A great example of this is when he talked about the Zamasu arc cause he said it was a suggestion from the editorial office, not something he himself came up with. If Bandai wants to sell some evil Goku figures then it's up to him to make it happen and if he can't then someone else will.
That's based on the involvement of Toriyama. From what I've seen of interviews, his current level of involvement is of his choosing. He gets the final say on these ideas and its easy for him to take what they give him and change it to something he feels fits in Dragon Ball or subverts expectations. When I compared him to Oda and Kishimoto, I meant his vision for the story and his level of passion for writing it is just not the same as theirs. He doesn't prioritize the same things they prioritize, such as large casts of characters, backstories, lore, mysteries, intrigue. They had these epic stories that they planned out, constructed, deconstructed, fleshed out, and delved deeply into. Toriyama still doesn't have that level of passion and care for his world. He rarely delves deeply into anything and now that he's more hands off, it's even more noticeable. It makes sense because Toriyama is a gag mangaka at heart, whereas Oda and Kishimoto grew up on shounen manga like Dragon Ball and have a better understanding of what makes shounen work.
Remember back in 2014 when he said Goku would just use Ssj1 moving forward ? Ssjs sell too well so that idea went out the window.
Yeah, could also be a product of his script as he has a notoriously bad memory. You can't trust everything he says in interviews. Look at the Beerus, Whis, Goku scale. I would have loved for that quote to be true btw. The old SSJ forms just confuse things in Super.
Back when he worked on the manga however, he only answered to his editor who only expected one thing from him, to sell the story. how it was done was completely up to him. As long as the manga sold

Partially true. They held some sway over the direction of the manga and they'd often steer him in a good direction. For instance, Toriyama says in one interview that he wanted to end the Android Arc with #19 and #20, but his editor at the time said that they aren't appealing villains so Toriyama created #17 and #18 and was ready to call it a day. His editor told him he needed something better, so he created Cell then created Cell's alleged final form which was what we know as Semi-Perfect Cell. The editor though SP Cell was ugly and had Toriyama create what we now know as Perfect Cell. I think Toriyama's at his best when he has a sensible person in his ear, guiding --or rather, nudging his brilliance in the right direction. Can you imagine the Android saga ending with #19 and #20? Yuck.
and as long as people liked it, he was doing a grade A job, same thing with the 2 authors you brought up. Boruto's manga is in a similar position to DB's, they spent the last 3 chapters or so promoting a new card game that Bandai wants to make and sell. It doesn't matter that it made 0 sense within the context of the story, if the sponsor wants something, they get it or else they pull their $$$.
I agree, it frustrates me too. Merchandising is fine, but please don't do it at the expense of the show. I'm still convinced that Toei has a SSB and Goku quota that they have to fill for every episode for merchandising purposes. I think most of Super's problems to some degree stem from this blatant corporate greed.
When One Piece is all said and done, it'll most likely be the greatest written story in all of fiction so everyone involved with it will want it to continue beyond Oda's ending and like DB and Naruto, whoever works on it will have to do what they think will sell, regardless of it making for a good story or living up to what came before it.
I don't watch or read One Piece (yet) but I respect what Oda is doing with it and have been thinking that it might go down as the greatest story ever told from the scope, consistency, longevity, and level of detail it has. They'll pimp One Piece, but it won't be this new show after a show is over sort of thing. I think Oda is too hands on to allow them to mess with his world like that. Whatever Toei does with OP, if Oda's not involved, it'll be non-canon. I can see him going the Toriyama route, but if so his outline would be incredibly detailed.
sintzu wrote:
BWri wrote:The main difference between then and now is that Toriyama had editors to reign him in back then. I think that's what Super is missing lol. The tension is missing because Toriyama doesn't have his real life villainous editors watching from over his shoulder :lol:
He has worse, Bandai's stock holders.
Yeah, but they don't care about quality, consistency, or freshness of ideas like an editor would. So AT is basically free to do whatever he wants. They just want new characters and Saiyan transformations which he can easily give them with minimal effort.
Big fan of the characters of Dragon Ball, all of them, especially formerly prominent sub-characters. -__-

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by sintzu » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:21 am

BWri wrote:Toriyama can do whatever he wants as far as I understand. If he wanted, I'm sure Toei would allow him a more hands-on role.
Even if Toei lets him, they still have to answer to Bandai (their biggest sponsor) so if there's something they want then surely they'll get it. That's why we have a female Broly for example.
BWri wrote:When I compared him to Oda and Kishimoto, I meant his vision for the story and his level of passion for writing it is just not the same as theirs. He doesn't prioritize the same things they prioritize, such as large casts of characters, backstories, lore, mysteries, intrigue. They had these epic stories that they planned out, constructed, deconstructed, fleshed out, and delved deeply into.
Based on interviews with him, he wrote the way he did to not corner himself into writing a certain way all the time and wanted to experience the story with the readers instead of knowing everything from the start. Had everything been planned out, maybe it would've ended up as just a comedy adventure story rather than the epic Shonen we got.
Last edited by sintzu on Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:46 am

gofishus wrote: "BUT ITS NOT CANON SO IT SUCKS!!
This is NOT what I said lol
Secondly, while DBGT has inconsistent power levels, its nowhere near the clusterf*ck of power scaling that Super is. You're telling me that SSJ2 Trunks is as powerful as someone with God Ki? You're telling me that Android 17 within the span of a few months (because we all know he didnt do sh*t in Buu Arc) got to God tier level? You're telling me Master Roshi is suddenly one of the most powerful characters? Gimme a break. DBGT never had those kind of situations.
Yes power consistency in Super is an enormous mess, I am not sure you are following Super though, Roshi is far from being one of the most powerful characters lol
Otoh, while Super has nonsensical stuff at least it's transformations or cool fights that makes no sense, in GT it was that annoying and loud robot all the time we had to suffer with a lame Pan and a very lame Trunks on an even lamer storyline lol
I find SSJ4 to be the most original super saiyan transformation period. No color swap of the hair, just purely original. Nice.
Actually SSJ4 is one of the very few things I like from GT, too bad it's not canon lol
Oh yeah and how lame was Vegeta needing a freaking machine to transform ffs omg lol

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by sintzu » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:10 am

PsionicWarrior wrote:SSJ4 is one of the very few things I like from GT, too bad it's not canon lol
Oh yeah and Vegeta needing a freaking machine to transform ffs omg lol
Vegeta needed the machine for blitz waves which Goku got form looking at the earth and having a tail. The only thing the machine did was turn him into an Ozaru without the need of the tail and planet/moon. Turning into the golden Ozaru after being a normal one and contolling its power was all his doing.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:18 am

sintzu wrote:Vegeta needed the machine for blitz waves which Goku got form looking at the earth and having a tail. The only thing the machine did was turn him into an Ozaru without the need of the tail and planet/moon. Turning into the golden Ozaru after being a normal one and contolling its power was all his doing.
He almost didn't need a machine how neat lol
Anyway I swear you don't want to launch me on all that is wrong in GT, if you think GT is better than Super well it's your right but I'll always feel a little sorry for you no hard feelings lol

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by sintzu » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:02 am

PsionicWarrior wrote:He almost didn't need a machine how neat.

Anyway I swear you don't want to launch me on all that is wrong in GT.

If you think GT is better than Super...

I'll always feel a little sorry for you no hard feelings.
He didn't at all, it just saved him the time of pulling out his tail and waiting for a full moon.

If we were to talk about what's wrong with GT we'd be here all day.

I don't, not by a long shot. With every right thing Gt did, it did 10 others wrong. When Super messes up something it makes up for it later, GT never did that.

You'd feel sorry for someone for liking a piece of fiction over another ? I'll always feel sorry for you and anyone who takes something like this seriously.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:04 am

sintzu wrote: You'd feel sorry for someone for liking a piece of fiction over another ? I'll always feel sorry for you and anyone who takes something like this seriously.
Mate DB is sirious business lol

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by sintzu » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:09 am

PsionicWarrior wrote:Mate DB is sirious business lol
I'd understand if Vegeta was the main character but he's not so it shouldn't be taken that seriously :lol: .
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:10 am

sintzu wrote: I'd understand if Vegeta was the main character but he's not so it shouldn't be taken that seriously :lol: .
How dare you lol :P
I freaking love Vegeta, to be fair I am no fan of his handling in Super either though, but at least there he doesn't have a mustache lol

LowRyder2005
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 2:46 am

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by LowRyder2005 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:03 am

PsionicWarrior wrote:
sintzu wrote:Vegeta needed the machine for blitz waves which Goku got form looking at the earth and having a tail. The only thing the machine did was turn him into an Ozaru without the need of the tail and planet/moon. Turning into the golden Ozaru after being a normal one and contolling its power was all his doing.
He almost didn't need a machine how neat lol
Anyway I swear you don't want to launch me on all that is wrong in GT, if you think GT is better than Super well it's your right but I'll always feel a little sorry for you no hard feelings lol
Well... I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing myself, it could at least momentarily curb down your tendency to laugh at heart at every single word you read online. :)

User avatar
Cetra
I Live Here
Posts: 3855
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: Do you think DBS is a worthy continuation of DB and DBZ?

Post by Cetra » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:32 am

PsionicWarrior wrote:For sure something canonical can suck or be inconsistent I never said anything against that, I understand you believe all goes down to the IP owner no matter any factor directly relevant to the actual creation, to each his own.
That has nothing to do with "believing". That is how these things work. It is all about the property. There is intellectual property and legal property as well as the question of which owners have the right to do xyz. And we fans are no owners at all so we cannot decide a single thing. Just as made up rules like "Toriyama did not include GT in a series that happened before GT lulz" have no influence on canonicity. I question your seriousness though with this entire mentality that leads you to write that stuff, let it end with a lol each line and even start offending people like the above poster with something like "you can think that but I feel sorry for you then" as if GT is something unquestionably worse and he is sick to think different.
PsionicWarrior wrote:... too bad it's not canon lol
And the next claim misusing canonicity.
PsionicWarrior wrote:
How dare you lol :P
I freaking love Vegeta, to be fair I am no fan of his handling in Super either though, but at least there he doesn't have a mustache lol
Yes, and that mustache was a character design of Akira Toriyama himself, who you seem to give any more credibility when it comes to brand owners while Super by the way does not have mustache Vegeta but full beard Vegeta.
Last edited by Cetra on Thu Aug 31, 2017 8:00 am, edited 7 times in total.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy

feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"

Post Reply