Totamo wrote:There is no such thing as official canon. First of all the word canon itself, basically means official so you are being redundant.
Second, even then. For years we have argued what really counts and what doesn't and not many actually agree. You may say its the 42 volume manga but then what do you tell people who only watch the original 291 anime and have not read the entire manga? Sorry, if you want the real story, read the manga because they won't do it. The west don't read no where near as much as Japan. One Piece will tell you that beautiful story.
I mean come on, some people don't even count the Buu saga as a part of Z, that's the fandom we are dealing with here so good luck policing that.
Honestly, everytime you say super isn't canon, i feel like you trying to convince yourself that, not us. Otherwise, you wouldn't say it so often.
No, I'm not. You may not be familiarized with the word, but it's also used by the
Star Wars fan base to differentiate side stuff from the Expanded Universe e.g
You're half right, there's no official stated canon, but you see
Dragon Ball came off as a manga that was adapted in two animated series, had nineteen movies and two TV specials, by anything what it should be considered the only and one official canon is the material used to these adaptations, the original work, the 42 volumes of the manga by Toriyama Akira and not anything else.
You're making the common mistake of thinking that filler is something factually bad. Did I ever said that people are forced to read the manga, just because it's the story in its purest form and overall DB/Z anime is full of filler and disposable stuff? No. I Actually enjoy a lot of added scenes that were not present in the manga, like Gohan training in the Saiyan arc e.g
So people can watch the anime adaptations just fine, my point is that even though I may enjoy fillers, animated sequels (GT and Super), I realize they're not part of the main story, which it also doesn't mean they're bad.