Doesn't he starts up his Kikohou sometimes like that?MainJPW wrote:Is that what I think it is?Olympian wrote: [spoiler][/spoiler]
Check this from 0:47: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWuuCHBUxRw
Tho it would be cool, if he could use Kiai too.
Doesn't he starts up his Kikohou sometimes like that?MainJPW wrote:Is that what I think it is?Olympian wrote: [spoiler][/spoiler]
Kanassa wrote:What have you got against people who like Super?cringey wrote:Yamcha will be my main for sure. Together, we will beat the s**t out of those Super fans.
The bold one is wrong, where did you read that?!Ranmaru Rei wrote:Each character will have only one costume, but different palletes, because to do new costumes for characters is quite hard for their engine.
Literally the same thing I'd wanted to see, but I guess that was DB era, and they went with his Saiyan Saga incernation instead. Originally I wasn't even positive about having him in the roster, but after seeing the screenshots, I'm happy, his Rouga fu fu ken with the added claw and wolf-head effects looks awesome.Olympian wrote:I would love a Puar for support (so Yamcha can have his own Sword moves
Somewhere is explanation, why Guilty Gear Xrd has no alternative costumes. DB Fighter Z use the same engine. So, the reason is same.cringey wrote:The bold one is wrong, where did you read that?!Ranmaru Rei wrote:Each character will have only one costume, but different palletes, because to do new costumes for characters is quite hard for their engine.
In other words, each costume requires a ton of work, that can be spent for making new character instead.from reddit discussion of this question wrote:They did a gdc talk about the work required for one character being modeled and lit on YouTube about 3 or 4 years ago. Look it up. The time consuming part is the custom lighting for each animation frame to make it look 2d, not 3d. If ty did standard lighting like two men, it would be easy, but they don't do that. This is also why we only get about 5 or 6 characters added per revision, instead of having all the old cast by now, because it takes so long for each character.
[spoiler]Olympian wrote: Do we have images yet on how Chiatzu will look?

[/spoiler]I`m not interely sure it`s even the Saiyan version. The hairstyle is the current one and the GI looks more like the one in the 2008 movie going by memory.KayDash wrote:Literally the same thing I'd wanted to see, but I guess that was DB era, and they went with his Saiyan Saga incernation instead. Originally I wasn't even positive about having him in the roster, but after seeing the screenshots, I'm happy, his Rouga fu fu ken with the added claw and wolf-head effects looks awesome.Olympian wrote:I would love a Puar for support (so Yamcha can have his own Sword moves
Seems like he will be a nice rushdown character, kinda like Wolverine was in MvC.
We know next to nothing about the plot aside from the concept: Android Scientist with Gero-like Intelligence. Army of clones. 16 is there.WittyUsername wrote:Regarding the story for this game, it honestly seems like this story could've actually made for a pretty solid movie or arc for Super (though I'm iffy about Cell and Freeza's involvement). It's almost a shame that it's being used for a video game.
Kanassa wrote:- FoolsGil, Out of Context, 2017FoolsGil wrote:I hope Mark is dead. But chances are the dragonballs will bring his stupid ass back.
The concept seems like it has a lot of potential though. It's something that the franchise hasn't really done before, which is certainly a step up from something like Ressurection F.Kanassa wrote:We know next to nothing about the plot aside from the concept: Android Scientist with Gero-like Intelligence. Army of clones. 16 is there.WittyUsername wrote:Regarding the story for this game, it honestly seems like this story could've actually made for a pretty solid movie or arc for Super (though I'm iffy about Cell and Freeza's involvement). It's almost a shame that it's being used for a video game.
I'd say it's far to early to actually judge the story at all.
Uh, what? What hasn't been done before?WittyUsername wrote:The concept seems like it has a lot of potential though. It's something that the franchise hasn't really done before, which is certainly a step up from something like Ressurection F.
We've had an evil version of Goku, but not an entire android army of evil versions of the Z-fighters. That was what I was referring to.Doctor. wrote:Uh, what? What hasn't been done before?WittyUsername wrote:The concept seems like it has a lot of potential though. It's something that the franchise hasn't really done before, which is certainly a step up from something like Ressurection F.
Evil/clone versions of our main characters? Been there, done that.
Evil genius scientist? Been there, done that.
Asspulled new villain with connections to a past arc? Been there, done that.
Bringing back an old popular character for the sake of nostalgia? Been there, done that.
That idea is very generic, everybody complained about Goku Black when he was revealed for that very reason.WittyUsername wrote:We've had an evil version of Goku, but not an entire android army of evil versions of the Z-fighters. That was what I was referring to.