Well, how's that for patronizing?Xyex wrote:*Sigh*Dragon Ball fans, particularly of the kind like those who frequent Daizex, have EVERY right to expect the worst from this movie.
How did I know I would get responses like this? It's depressing really.
"Possibly"? Have we read the same article?Last I saw, the only thing we knew they were doing with Goku was putting him in highschool and, possibly, giving him a crush on Chi-Chi
Gokû having a crush on somebody? Have we read the same manga?(which by the time he's 18 is no where near a stretch of the imagination even in the series).
They said "high ninjas". That's oddly specific, for a "best example description".Which could be a 'best example' description for Piccolo's underlings. We. Don't. Know.And one last time for the cheap seats; EVIL. NAMEKIAN. NINJAS.
And that's more than enough to tell, actually. Maybe you should consider reading them.So the personalities are completely and utterly different than the show? What, you've seen clips of the movie? We've got paragraph sized blurbs about them. That's it.
Dude. What did you think the purpose of those paragraphs was? Do you think that's promotional material? Does it look like they're deliberately keeping things vague, when they give away several plot twists?You can't tell jack shit from a paragraph outside of the vaguest possible directions which tell you abslutely zip about the final product without liberal ammounts of luck.
They're fucking casting sides. They're supposed to tell you what you need to know about the characters.
"their mutual attraction finally heats up during a training session."And where the hell do you see anything about sexual desires.
"Piccolo has some disturbing news for Goku, namely that the boy is actually a Saiyan who's destined to join Piccolo as his right hand in destroying and enslaving the planet..."why do you insist on reading that destiny line as some sort of fate mumbo jumbo and not the far more obvious "you're from a race of conquers so it is in your blood to conquer" implication it gives off?
Why do you assume it's just a vague implication, when the casting side is pretty specific? Wishful thinking, perhaps? Like with the "they're not being literal about the high ninjas" thing?
Yay, another cliché.aside from Mai sounding like she's actually useful in the movie
Yeah, how arrogant of us to assume they're being literal and accurate in casting sides!I'm bitching about the fact that people are bitching about things they don't even know about yet as though it's concrete fact.
It was a terrible idea to begin with.My issue is with the fact that everyone's already decided that the movie is the worst thing ever and filming hasn't even started yet.









