1. When it comes out of nowhere it's just retread. There's no substance behind it. It's literally the exact same strategy used against Boo except it's done off screen so the audience doesn't see it. In the Boo arc it had meaning because we saw the formation of it and how hard it was to execute the plan. In the Shadow Dragon arc it was just borderline patchwork designed to figure out a way to beat Omega. Literally about 6 minutes pass from the big reveal to the destruction of Omega. It's not particularly welcome or clever, it's a redo and something they quite easily could have done with any villain in GT, it's just they set up the heroes in an unwinnable scenario and then needed to re use an old set up to get them out.ABED wrote:Disagree on all counts. Do you just want a direct copy? So what if it was done off screen? It was a welcome surprise and not a deus ex machina.It's a sound strategy, but the execution was off imo. If they formulated the plan and it was:
Goku: this guys tough, we don't have the power to beat him, we need way more than we could ever do on our own.
Vegeta: Well remember how we beat Boo, we don't need to use only our power.
Goku: Good idea. King Kai, help out with this.
Instead Goku just comes out of the abyss with it and then casually mentions that he did the exact same thing and then even more quickly gets the power from the rest of the universe. In the Boo arc it was actually a process and an ordeal. In GT it was "oh they are doing this again". And it was also the only time the finish to a major arc fight was both a repeat and formulated off screen.
Also in context it was Goku fighting a foe who absorbed other beings to gain more power, him and Vegeta fusing and getting cocky and not finishing the job, then the genki dama. It was very similar and not done with the same care as the Boo arc.
Gogeta getting cocky wasn't the same. The big difference is that in the Buu arc, he wasn't cocky. He was confident. He was intentionally wasting time so he could get absorbed.
There really wasn't much potential. They were all villains that had long since been surpassed, with the exception of Rildo. If I recall, Nappa did get a line, but he didn't have much of a strong connection to Vegeta. Vegeta killed him without a second thought when he felt he was useless. I wish people would stop judging things mostly by comparison to some vague ideas of what they think could've or should've happened.there is so much potential with all these past villains coming back and having them all be essentially one shotted. Nappa had such a strong tie to Vegeta and was the main source of destruction in the Saiyan battle that you would think he'd at least get a line of dialogue.
2. You're hanging on semantics on this one. Okay Gogeta was cocky and Vegito was just acting cocky. Gotenks was cocky for that matter. It was still a similar set up of an unbeatable regenerating villain who the heroes are having a hard time putting down, a fusion used to turn the tide but ultimately failing, then a last ditch genki dama that was created by using the spare energy of the world (or in this case universe) to finally end things. It wasn't a particular original or inspired final battle.
3. As far as Nappa and the villains you are thinking purely in terms of fighting. These villains all had characters that could have been utilized in some form or fashion beyond just being old designs with no real substance behind them getting mostly one shotted by the heroes. A good chunk of these villains would have never engaged in open combat against foes they were that outmatched by. Nappa fine because he was always not the brightest bulb. There was so much more potential than a bunch of characterless false obstacles for the heroes until the real fight started. This was the penultimate arc and you just gave yourself an excuse to revisit the old hits of the franchise before the series ended and it just amounted to a whole lot of nothing kills.



