TekTheNinja wrote:
Kunshi was absolute fodder and Narirama's elimination was for forgettable that I actually quite literally forgot it happened.
But you did not forget that Vegeta eliminated a lot of fodder?It seems to me you only remember whichone suits your points.
No it doesn't matter who he lost to. Anyone can lose to a strong guy.
So losing to Narirama would be the same to losing to Jirren for example?Yeah sure.
By that logic a saibaman getting destroyed by Jiren would make saibamen the coolest things ever. No
If the saibaman fared as well as Hit did?You would be damn sure it would be.
If you legitimately think Hit had a good showing there's something wrong with you.
No surprise there(i think he had a decent/okish showing not good btw),that seems to be your go quote/behaviour whenever someone disagrees with you,nonetheless the bolded words would have some weight to them in regards to this topic if you did not have the tendency to misuse the world fodder.
Then again you are right there must be something wrong with me,since you also tried to rationalize the thought behind a stupid theory the fandom made to suit your points due to the bias you seem to have against dbs,so i should have seen this(the bolded part) coming.