Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:06 am

ABED wrote: Having not seen Super, do they elaborate more on god ki? What makes it different than mortal ki?
Since the series are on a break why don't you catch up?

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20493
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ABED » Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:08 am

PsionicWarrior wrote:
ABED wrote: Having not seen Super, do they elaborate more on god ki? What makes it different than mortal ki?
Since the series are on a break why don't you catch up?
Not enough interest, plus I'm not much for streaming through my laptop. I prefer physical media anyway, and it's not cheap enough for me to consider buying it.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
PsionicWarrior
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon May 09, 2016 2:33 pm

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by PsionicWarrior » Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:15 am

ABED wrote: Not enough interest, plus I'm not much for streaming through my laptop. I prefer physical media anyway, and it's not cheap enough for me to consider buying it.
Ah, I understand. I could recommend you to read the manga then, it has contradictions with the anime but it's the same story. I personally prefer it to the anime, but the anime has its gems here and there.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ekrolo2 » Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:38 am

ABED wrote:Having not seen Super, do they elaborate more on god ki? What makes it different than mortal ki?
Besides it being more powerful and not detectable by non-God ki using people (although the series flip flops on this) there is no real difference. They don't even use the non-detection thing to give Goku & Vegeta an edge over say Hit or Freeza.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
GamerSkull
Regular
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:45 pm
Location: United States

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by GamerSkull » Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:22 pm

I just believe it devalues the legend as it was introduced in the Namek arc. I will always believe that Goku and Gohan should have been the only ones with the transformation... with only Gohan achieving the Super Saiyan 2 transformation.
"Roga Fu-Fu Ken!"

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:03 pm

GamerSkull wrote:I just believe it devalues the legend as it was introduced in the Namek arc. I will always believe that Goku and Gohan should have been the only ones with the transformation... with only Gohan achieving the Super Saiyan 2 transformation.
Gohan did fit with the potential crap they been spouted about him since the start but I didn't like how he got SS2 with #16 was just hammy to me. Goku sacrificing himself and then Cell coming back should have been the trigger in my opinion.

DragonBallKing
Regular
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:44 pm
Location: Oklahoma, USA

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by DragonBallKing » Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:50 pm

I think SSJ should have been the limit for the Z series and like others have said make gohans SSJ form stronger than his fathers and trunks via his rage boost, I also believe that in order to preserve the powerful pure hearted saiyan thing Vegeta should not have achieved SSJ until the buu arc either by using Babidi's magic to bypass the rule and through his sacrifice.
Check out my MAL page: https://myanimelist.net/profile/RapeHorse


Original Dragon Ball arcs ranking: 23rd Budokai, Saiyan, 21st Budokai, Red Ribbon, Freeza, Piccolo Daimao, 22nd Budokai, DB Hunt, Cell, Buu

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20493
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ABED » Sun Apr 01, 2018 6:53 pm

DragonBallKing wrote:I think SSJ should have been the limit for the Z series and like others have said make gohans SSJ form stronger than his fathers and trunks via his rage boost, I also believe that in order to preserve the powerful pure hearted saiyan thing Vegeta should not have achieved SSJ until the buu arc either by using Babidi's magic to bypass the rule and through his sacrifice.
Pure hearted qualification was just conjecture.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Forte224
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1425
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:56 pm

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by Forte224 » Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:41 pm

ABED wrote:
DragonBallKing wrote:I think SSJ should have been the limit for the Z series and like others have said make gohans SSJ form stronger than his fathers and trunks via his rage boost, I also believe that in order to preserve the powerful pure hearted saiyan thing Vegeta should not have achieved SSJ until the buu arc either by using Babidi's magic to bypass the rule and through his sacrifice.
Pure hearted qualification was just conjecture.
I'd say it's a confirmed qualification if Toriyama felt the need to have Vegeta clarify that he was indeed pure...pure evil.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ekrolo2 » Mon Apr 02, 2018 8:55 am

Forte224 wrote:
ABED wrote:
DragonBallKing wrote:I think SSJ should have been the limit for the Z series and like others have said make gohans SSJ form stronger than his fathers and trunks via his rage boost, I also believe that in order to preserve the powerful pure hearted saiyan thing Vegeta should not have achieved SSJ until the buu arc either by using Babidi's magic to bypass the rule and through his sacrifice.
Pure hearted qualification was just conjecture.
I'd say it's a confirmed qualification if Toriyama felt the need to have Vegeta clarify that he was indeed pure...pure evil.
Which is weird even with that line since Vegeta being a bastard is what keeps him from getting it on Namek but not in the Android arc.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20493
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ABED » Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:50 am

And yet how does anyone know that? For years, Vegeta thought it was a myth and all of the sudden they're all experts on how to attain that form? I get the real world response, but ultimately that doesn't really matter. Toriyama can change his mind and it can still work in-universe that the characters were wrong. Also, Vegeta's a dick. Not everything he says is gospel. Besides, Vegeta is boasting.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Forte224
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1425
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:56 pm

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by Forte224 » Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:59 am

ABED wrote:And yet how does anyone know that? For years, Vegeta thought it was a myth and all of the sudden they're all experts on how to attain that form? I get the real world response, but ultimately that doesn't really matter. Toriyama can change his mind and it can still work in-universe that the characters were wrong. Also, Vegeta's a dick. Not everything he says is gospel. Besides, Vegeta is boasting.
I don't understand why the real world response doesn't matter. Toriyama hasn't changed his mind, either.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20493
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ABED » Mon Apr 02, 2018 10:05 am

Forte224 wrote:
ABED wrote:And yet how does anyone know that? For years, Vegeta thought it was a myth and all of the sudden they're all experts on how to attain that form? I get the real world response, but ultimately that doesn't really matter. Toriyama can change his mind and it can still work in-universe that the characters were wrong. Also, Vegeta's a dick. Not everything he says is gospel. Besides, Vegeta is boasting.
I don't understand why the real world response doesn't matter. Toriyama hasn't changed his mind, either.
Because the real world whether he changes his mind doesn't matter if in-universe it can be easily explained as Vegeta's full of crap or they were just guessing or Vegeta was just boasting. While Vegeta is a monster, he's not pure evil even by that point. All that ultimately matters is the actual story because that's what most people will be reading or watching, not Toriyama's comments. The story must speak for itself.

I know some are against Vegeta attaining SSJ, but I like what it means for his character. He attains it but it doesn't get him what he wants.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

WittyUsername
I Live Here
Posts: 4612
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by WittyUsername » Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:22 pm

I’d say so. The transformation was initially set up and established as being this legendary power that’s nearly impossible to obtain, but it’s now just become a cheap power-up and nothing more. Not to mention that the form essentially became obsolete the moment they started introducing stronger levels of transformations.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:40 pm

This really depends on how people vision the uniqueness of the form or what they expect from the characters to get it. There are a plethora of angles to what people say about it. Maybe the inane Saiyan-Centerism the series has now could make people sick of how expected it is for all Saiyans to get it just to keep up, or people hate it because the easier it is to get the less impact it has for the lore. Or it could be that people just want Goku & Vegeta to stay special due to how their stories for Super Saiyan were held so much higher than everyone else's next to Gohan being the apprentice for it. The issue is that there isn't any contrast anymore between those deemed special with it and those who can't get it. I mean Bardock getting it was pretty much where it died for me. Pure-Base form Saiyans are now the "rarity" now.

Maybe the space in between when characters get it is closing too tightly with Super which worsens it. If Cabba and Kale were the only ones with the forms for their universes first, it would have had Caulflia something she needed to work on herself for. Kale was saved from the heap simply because hers was different, and SSB for a while did this for Goku Vegeta (until they made it look inessential).

Transformations in general for Saiyans is getting tiresome because its like a factory mill for their growth now.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

blain218
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 10:29 pm

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by blain218 » Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:46 am

No its not a legit criticism. Because saiyans are supposed to be beings of infinite potential, people shouldn't have a problem with all of them inevitably getting the transformation and then some. It should be expected of them in the first place.

Its like complaining about other cultures rapidly gaining a new technology are one had created it.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:03 am

blain218 wrote:No its not a legit criticism. Because saiyans are supposed to be beings of infinite potential, people shouldn't have a problem with all of them inevitably getting the transformation and then some. It should be expected of them in the first place.

Its like complaining about other cultures rapidly gaining a new technology are one had created it.
You're using in-universe logic to justify out-universe writing patterns. Saiyans are only limitless because the endless transformations are a marketing point. Narratively it's cheap.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

blain218
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 10:29 pm

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by blain218 » Tue Apr 03, 2018 11:51 am

SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:
blain218 wrote:No its not a legit criticism. Because saiyans are supposed to be beings of infinite potential, people shouldn't have a problem with all of them inevitably getting the transformation and then some. It should be expected of them in the first place.

Its like complaining about other cultures rapidly gaining a new technology are one had created it.
You're using in-universe logic to justify out-universe writing patterns. Saiyans are only limitless because the endless transformations are a marketing point. Narratively it's cheap.
In-universe logic should dictate writing patterns. Otherwise you would just create plotholes.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20493
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by ABED » Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:09 pm

But it's not illogical in universe for even the Saiyans to have limits.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Is the criticism against everyone getting the Super Saiyan form a legitimate one?

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:38 pm

blain218 wrote:
SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:
blain218 wrote:No its not a legit criticism. Because saiyans are supposed to be beings of infinite potential, people shouldn't have a problem with all of them inevitably getting the transformation and then some. It should be expected of them in the first place.

Its like complaining about other cultures rapidly gaining a new technology are one had created it.
You're using in-universe logic to justify out-universe writing patterns. Saiyans are only limitless because the endless transformations are a marketing point. Narratively it's cheap.
In-universe logic should dictate writing patterns. Otherwise you would just create plotholes.
In-universe logic should be for guidelines, not loopholes. Thats what retcons do. Its not a retcon to say Sayians are limitless but its not good writing to act on this so literally just because it gives market hype.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

Post Reply