
No KMH pose... Yamamuro well done!
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
That photo has so many problems. The biceps are misplaced, the arms looks weird and it looks hastely made.Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
No KMH pose... Yamamuro well done!
I don't see any problems with the legs or the left arm. That's were biceps go and he is doing a weird pose, you only have to understand it and you will see there is nothing wrong. However, I do find weird the head and the muscles behind it, it makes me think Goku has a humpBaggie_Saiyan wrote:
No KMH pose... Yamamuro well done!
I can assure you your bicep does not go inside your shoulder.Alee9977 wrote: I don't see any problems with the legs or the left arm. That's were biceps go and he is doing a weird pose, you only have to understand it and you will see there is nothing wrong. However, I do find weird the head and the muscles behind it, it makes me think Goku has a hump
You may still like it, but the drawing is objectively wrong in the anatomy, and the face/head is also way too asymmetrical.Asura wrote:He's doing a slav squat.![]()
It's really not that bad though, I think you're all being a bit too nitpicky.
I'm just saying, you're all being way too nitpicky and shitting on it simply because it's Yamamuro. I don't like the guy much either, and I hate him as the head character designer for Super, but I know that if this was anyone else who drew this you guys would be like "Well yeah it's got a few issues but it's not THAT bad".emperior wrote:You may still like it, but the drawing is objectively wrong in the anatomy, and the face/head is also way too asymmetrical.Asura wrote:He's doing a slav squat.![]()
It's really not that bad though, I think you're all being a bit too nitpicky.
Asura wrote:What's baseless about it? I think the general disdain for Yamamuro is more than obvious at this point, so I have quite a base to go on. That, and the fact that the majority of pictures posted here that people scrutinize that aren't from the anime are, you named it, all done by Yamamuro. Of course I've seen people call out general product artists as well, but they're rare and few and far between. And yeah, I get it, he's the series designer and he's responsible for all this stuff which is why he gets more attention, but it's starting to get ridiculous with how much people are constantly shitting on him. Calling the anatomy "astronomically terrible" is a huge exaggeration. You want to see what astronomically terrible anatomy actually looks like? Look at early JoJo:
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
And this shot in particular is probably the worst I have ever seen, this is something that deserves the title of astronomically terrible anatomy, not Yamamuro's UI Goku.
[spoiler][/spoiler]
'Worse' anatomy elsewhere does not negate what's here, so your Jojo examples were unnecessary, not to mention a bit silly considering Araki's approach to literally everything he does. Yamamuro's not trying to be wacky here. But whatever, I'm not really here to engage with you on your dissenting opinion.Asura wrote:What's baseless about it? I think the general disdain for Yamamuro is more than obvious at this point, so I have quite a base to go on. That, and the fact that the majority of pictures posted here that people scrutinize that aren't from the anime are, you named it, all done by Yamamuro.
100% agree with everything you said, especially the part about one side expecting you to understand their dislike for Yamamuro, but not respecting people who do like him. And that's the thing too, I don't even like Yamamuro, but it's annoying to see him constantly bashed over and over again even for the smallest of things. Like you said, there are definitely things that are off about the picture, I'm not defending the anatomy in saying that it's perfectly fine because yeah, obviously there are issues. Are they big enough issues to warrant this much complaining and nitpicking though? Absolutely not.DainIronfoot wrote:Asura wrote:What's baseless about it? I think the general disdain for Yamamuro is more than obvious at this point, so I have quite a base to go on. That, and the fact that the majority of pictures posted here that people scrutinize that aren't from the anime are, you named it, all done by Yamamuro. Of course I've seen people call out general product artists as well, but they're rare and few and far between. And yeah, I get it, he's the series designer and he's responsible for all this stuff which is why he gets more attention, but it's starting to get ridiculous with how much people are constantly shitting on him. Calling the anatomy "astronomically terrible" is a huge exaggeration. You want to see what astronomically terrible anatomy actually looks like? Look at early JoJo:
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
And this shot in particular is probably the worst I have ever seen, this is something that deserves the title of astronomically terrible anatomy, not Yamamuro's UI Goku.
[spoiler][/spoiler]
I'm sure all who've visited this thread frequently have seen my thoughts on the whole "bashing of Yamamuro" posts on here and how i feel about them. However, I've for the most part moved on and just kept to myself. I've just come to ignore the mindless bashes but understand the valid ones (as i have my own criticisms as well). In the end though, they won't stop as some people automatically drop their view to a low if Yam's name is attached to it. The thing I found hysterical in a way though is that while one side expects you to understand their dislike, they don't seem to have a mutual respect for the other side who might like it. You'll always be met with the same "That has no basis of reality" or "you can't have an opinion". This goes both ways by the way, as i see it said often by both sides.
As for the picture, in my opinion there are a few things that are a bit off in it, however, it's not downright disgusting and to most people who view it casually they may think it's quite decent. Though, it's funny that anatomical issues are being brought up, because it makes me think back to the Nii/Yamamuro UI Goku some time ago. Yamamuro's was more accurate anatomically than Nii's but that for the most part had been dismissed as insignificant by some. Instead, since they couldn't use that, they resorted to other "issues" in the drawings. However, if it's Yamamuro's with the less accurate anatomy, it's like people are going to take up arms.
I really am glad Yamamuro stepped down from his role and is instead going to focus on Heroes. Hopefully, the discussion will eventually move on to the new style/designs from Shintani. I'll be glad when it does. I'd like to think it would be a fresh and positive change. I'm also curious to see more people discuss animation in the series after Ajay's great panel at Kamehacon.
Worse anatomy doesn't negate what's here, but it certainly puts it into perspective. When you're using massive exaggerated hyperboles like "astronomically terrible" to describe something that is nowhere near that quality, I am going to show you comparisons and try to get you to understand why it's not as horrific as you're making it out to be. I'm not even saying you can't complain about the anatomy because there are worse things out there, I'm saying you shouldn't be using exaggerated terms to make it sound worse than it really is. You're of course entitled to your opinion about how you view the picture, but so am I. I gave examples as to why I feel the picture is not as bad as it seems (and there's a difference between Araki's later poses that follow more anatomical structure and the type of stuff he was putting out in Parts 1 and 2 that were definitely not intentional, hell only one of those examples was an actual pose), but you have yet to explain why you think it's so horrible. You pointed out the issues, but how do those issues really come together to arrive at such a dire conclusion like the one you're making? What are you comparing this to that makes you say it's astronomically terrible? Because on its own, I don't understand how you can arrive at that type of conclusion. I 100% understand your dislike for it, and the issues you bring up with it are very valid and very true, but I don't see how they're big enough to warrant the very serious and heavy criticisms you're giving it.Ajay wrote:'Worse' anatomy elsewhere does not negate what's here, so your Jojo examples were unnecessary, not to mention a bit silly considering Araki's approach to literally everything he does. Yamamuro's not trying to be wacky here. But whatever, I'm not really here to engage with you on your dissenting opinion.Asura wrote:What's baseless about it? I think the general disdain for Yamamuro is more than obvious at this point, so I have quite a base to go on. That, and the fact that the majority of pictures posted here that people scrutinize that aren't from the anime are, you named it, all done by Yamamuro.
Your posts are baseless because they're focusing on a small slice of each and everyone posting here. Take a little look outside this forum bubble and you'll see just as many conversations and 'nitpicks' about Toyotaro, Toriyama, and even Takahashi. Heck, there's plenty on this forum anyway.
If you're seeing complaints about Yamamuro's work, then hey, maybe it's because it's a consistent issue that's in people's faces all the time. It's not some manufactured grudge.
Even if it is nitpicking to you, so what? It's a thread dedicated to nitpicking. Comes with the territory. Don't agree with people? Fine, explain why. Otherwise get over it and stop posting annoying generalisations. Your posts have been on thin ice for a while now.
Thanks.
This thread is like a minefield. Proceed with caution.majinwarman wrote:Is it okay to post on this forum again?