Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie #1 Thread: "Broly"

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8644
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Grimlock » Thu Jan 03, 2019 7:21 pm

ironfist2020 wrote:i agree. it has weak storyline. i dont get why it has to be an hour and a half and not 2 hours and a half. for a much anticipated dragon ball movie years in the making. the Saiyan stroy in the begining needed to be an hour long
I actually thought the movie had a fine running time, but like I said, it emphasized the wrong thing. That one hour would have been more well used if it had been dedicated to the past scenes and developed its characters. The last 40 minutes could have been dedicated to the fight scene. Would have been perfect, would have earned this movie the title "Best Dragon Ball movie".

Unfortunately, the people from the production side also prefer fights over story for some reason. Oh well, it seems I can only expect some story from games these days. Kinda weird but it is what it is now.

User avatar
Miracles
I Live Here
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:31 am

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Miracles » Thu Jan 03, 2019 7:38 pm

Shaddy wrote:The movie told a complete and concise story about Broly as a character. You're conflating your priorities of what the story should be about with the misconception that it somehow doesn't exist. Not that this is new in the slightest, but it's definitely doing a disservice to the film to claim it has no story just because it isn't about meaningless extraneous bullshit like the ultimate non-character Yamoshi or the Tsufurians who Toriyama has obviously never cared about putting in the story proper (which is good, because they're not interesting in the slightest). Constantly valuing a load of "lore" without thinking critically about whether it's meaningful or a well-told story is a massive mistake.
BINGO!

I always thought Toriyama did a good job at expanding characters background in a short and sweet kind of way. No elongated dialogue of petty details. I don't think I would expect anything different when I see this movie.

User avatar
AnimeNation101
I Live Here
Posts: 2191
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 8:01 pm
Location: Planet ShoJump

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by AnimeNation101 » Thu Jan 03, 2019 7:47 pm

Grimlock wrote:
ironfist2020 wrote:i agree. it has weak storyline. i dont get why it has to be an hour and a half and not 2 hours and a half. for a much anticipated dragon ball movie years in the making. the Saiyan stroy in the begining needed to be an hour long
I actually thought the movie had a fine running time, but like I said, it emphasized the wrong thing. That one hour would have been more well used if it had been dedicated to the past scenes and developed its characters. The last 40 minutes could have been dedicated to the fight scene. Would have been perfect, would have earned this movie the title "Best Dragon Ball movie".

Unfortunately, the people from the production side also prefer fights over story for some reason. Oh well, it seems I can only expect some story from games these days. Kinda weird but it is what it is now.
Just out of curiosity what kinda of past scenes would you have wanted to see and who do you think needed more development?
I called it that Gogeta, Bardock, and something Broly related would be in the movie before it was even announced that it was a Broly movie. 8)

"I don't think I'm a hero of justice or anythin'. But those who'd hurt my friends... I won't forgive!"

User avatar
Shaddy
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1651
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Shaddy » Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:27 pm

Doctor. wrote: You could make a point that the movie falsely advertised its story. And I will make this point, because the trailers constantly stressed how this movie was the story of three Saiyans of different backgrounds meeting. You'd figure the movie would play on their differences and write a story around the three that adequately represented their different perspectives on "strength" (another point stressed by the trailers that went nowhere in the movie), but only Broly has a complete arc this movie. Vegeta's arc is non-existent, and he's basically forgotten halfway through the movie until he's needed for fusion fodder; and Goku's arc is incoherent, his attitude toward Broly is at odds with Gogeta's (which makes him feel like nothing more than fanservice, rather than being there to serve some kind of narrative purpose), and his 'development' at the end of the film feels undeserved.
That's totally a point worth making, not even one I disagree with necessarily. I never said it was well written or marketed in anything but the most capitalistic way possible, I just take a bit of issue with this dude completely minimizing what it does do in order to push this ridiculous agenda that the terrible video game stories are somehow engaging or at their core have any idea where Dragon Ball's heart actually lies, when by all means they're typically soulless and ride completely off of underdeveloped edgy trash characters. Seeing this bolstered as "THA REEEEL DRAGON BALL" feels like a genuine insult to the work that goes into making every other part of the series exciting, and the fact that it's coupled with completely ignoring most aspects of the production to claim that some bullshit like Heroes is superior by the premise alone makes me wonder why he'd even bother watching the series when he might as well just read the wikipedia plot summaries. It honestly feels disrespectful or misunderstanding of the franchise's legacy to have that complaint about the film but completely pass by something that is worse on every conceivable level, and treat the mere though of those who disagree as ignorant tossers.

EDIT: see? Just look at the post below this one. None of those things contribute to the themes, most characterization, tone or general flow of an actual movie, it's all nonsense based in trying to fit it into the lame extended canon for the series. After the pages upon pages of bitching about this movie adapting Dragon Ball Minus a few months ago, none of this shit is even in the interest of restoring Bardock's personality to what it once was, the priority is completely separate from making a good story. It'd just be a bunch of bloated filler fanservice.
Last edited by Shaddy on Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:42 pm, edited 3 times in total.

ironfist2020
Banned
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 10:04 am

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by ironfist2020 » Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:32 pm

AnimeNation101 wrote:
Grimlock wrote:
ironfist2020 wrote:i agree. it has weak storyline. i dont get why it has to be an hour and a half and not 2 hours and a half. for a much anticipated dragon ball movie years in the making. the Saiyan stroy in the begining needed to be an hour long
I actually thought the movie had a fine running time, but like I said, it emphasized the wrong thing. That one hour would have been more well used if it had been dedicated to the past scenes and developed its characters. The last 40 minutes could have been dedicated to the fight scene. Would have been perfect, would have earned this movie the title "Best Dragon Ball movie".

Unfortunately, the people from the production side also prefer fights over story for some reason. Oh well, it seems I can only expect some story from games these days. Kinda weird but it is what it is now.
Just out of curiosity what kinda of past scenes would you have wanted to see and who do you think needed more development?
More bardock and king vegeta. I think a prequal series about the sayians would be the best.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8644
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Grimlock » Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:36 pm

AnimeNation101 wrote:Just out of curiosity what kinda of past scenes would you have wanted to see
• Yamoshi stuff
• Saiyans vs Tsufurujins war (with a proper AGE established on-screen).
• "41 years ago" adjusted to "46 years ago" (or to whenever the war mentioned above took place).
• A slightly extended cut to King Cold introducing Freeza.
• An extended cut to King Vegeta seeing Vegeta.
• A brief scene showing King Vegeta sending Tarble to another planet.
• A proper "AGE 739" appearing on-screen instead of just "five years later".
• A scene showing Bardock and Leek killing those creatures.
• A great deal of scenes with Gine.
• A scene showing King Vegeta facing Freeza.
• Scenes showing what happened during the one-month timeskip. Bardock getting his headband.
• A proper Bardock vs Freeza scene. With the former going outer space to confront the latter.
• An extended cut to kid Vegeta, kid Raditz and Nappa.
• A brief scene showing what happened to the other two survivors.
• An extended scene depicting Goku arriving on Earth from the manga Jaco, the Galactic Patrolman.

Bonus: • Bardock being captured/saved by a mysterious thing when caught by Freeza's attack. Just a tease for me... :shifty:
AnimeNation101 wrote:and who do you think needed more development?
Bardock, Gine and King Vegeta most definitely. Kid Vegeta, kid Raditz and Nappa as a bonus. With luck, Tarble, one way or another, he also needs it as his brief appearance in the OVA didn't do him justice.

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by dbzfan7 » Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:04 pm

ironfist2020 wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:So Gogeta is ready to kill Broly, but just lets Freeza go....
He dident wanted to kill him. He knew he will not die from this fight
He seemed to be going for it. Either way under no circumstance of letting Freeza just leave is A-Ok. That's just silly.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
Shineman
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: World of Information
Contact:

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Shineman » Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:27 pm

Shineman wrote:Just saw the film.

The film is good in terms of animation, but on the narrative side, it is a bit confusing.

The film attempts to display Broly’s tragic story (even though Broly’s story was tragic already in his original film), but it does not do enough to highlight those tragedies. It seemingly shows Paragus’ tragedy, considering that he abandoned everything he had, without question, to save his son.

The closest thing we get is that Broly had a friend, Paragus shooed him away and that is that. Everything else is from the perspective of other characters, mainly Cheeai, who had one too many assumptions on Paragus and Broly.

Speaking of which, what are your guys opinion on Cheeai? I think her involvement in the film really brings down my enjoyment. :think:

The film slingshot back and forth that Broly is an innocent child abused by his father, but at the same time, display that Paragus had to reason to do use the collar. Furthermore, the film shows that Paragus talks down to Broly multiple times before he used the shock collar as a last resort (which he only used once or twice… cannot recalled).

Yet, suddenly, Cheeai chastised Paragus for using it… despite the context that Broly was going to killed that person flirting with her.

So I don’t know if the film wants the audience to side with Cheeai; if it did, it sending out an confusing message, I think.
A continuation of my earlier post, I want to comment on other criticisms I had with the film. Once again, the film is a spectacular animated flick; stunning visuals, music is decent, some with highs and lows, and the choreography (first-person perspective comes into mind) was damn awesome. However, stunning visuals means nothing if the narrative is either all over the place or frail throughout and this film is a combination of both.

Dragon Ball Minus: Animated

The first section of the film (about 25 minutes) is a re-creation of Dragon Ball Minus in animated format. Another user said it best; if you like Minus, you will like this one, if you did not, well, it did not do engaging to reel you in. Bardock being the only Saiyan who figured out Freeza’s big plans was a bit hard to swallow, despite their attempt to add further reasoning onto it. There are new scenes presented here that was not shown in the Minus chapter, but it does not do anything to Minus itself, but more so towards the titular “antagonist”; as if simply only added the interaction between Paragus and King Vegeta (meaning, no Dragon Ball Minus)—and nothing would change.

There was a touching moment towards Goku’s departure, despite the emotional music trying to bait you in by giving “feels”, it felt flat. Once the actual movie starts, I finally felt something, a sense of joy—finally, the movie can start. Of course, I’m being hyperbolic here, but I digress.

There was a clear awkward transition between Freeza destroying the planet and Bardock, suddenly damaged, tries to stop it. I’d assumed there will be an extended version or a retelling, but man, does it look awkward and noticeable.

A user named Gaffer Tape said it best about the content:
Gaffer Tape wrote:“Ultimately, it's fan-service, plain and simple. There's no story here. It's just a bunch of, "Ooh, look, it's Goku's parents." "Ooh, look, it's Vegeta and Raditz as kids." "Ooh, look at all the shiny new backstory." What a waste. I'd rather it not has been written, which is a shame because what I've read of Jaco I've enjoyed immensely. But between this and the abysmal Episode of Bardock, I'd say it's clear they need to put this character on a shelf and never, ever use him again.”
The Tagline, the Characters and the Ugly

The film was advertised as hell and back as a movie about Goku, Vegeta and Broly; yet hardly any of them gets a glimpse of a character arc (even Broly barely scratches the surface here). In fact, hardly have anything to do with each other at all.

Goku hardly gets any character arc in this film and the end where he says “Kakarot” rings hollow, especially since such character arc regarding his heritage is completed in Saiyan and Freeza arc. One would think with Toriyama’s heavy involvement in the film would grant some promises, but it’s more-or-less the same we seen in Super—offsetting character moments that Goku shouldn’t be doing, like asking Freeza a word means (granted, it was a bit funny though!).

Vegeta gets to fight, then once Goku steps in, he just disappears from the film for 15 minutes until he shows up again for a few worth of scenes of fighting together before fusion. You know Piccolo always shows up in the film and saves Gohan? Is this Vegeta’s version? Shows up, fights something and then disappears when Goku gets into action? Hope it doesn’t become a habit.

One of the common criticisms of Broly is that he either have no personality, no character or a combination of both (and the often cited the zombification theory that never dies, Broly hates Goku because he cried). So, naturally, whatever new aspect presented in this film will be taken face value without examination. After watching the film, I cannot see where the idea that new Broly had “more” character than the original.

Here’s what we know about Broly:
  • He has an ignorant view of new shit around him (is curiosity a personality trait…?), since he’d been on Vampa for 41 or so years.
  • He used to have a gigantic space pupper as a friend before his Dad shooed him away.
  • He doesn’t like the collar thing.
  • Loves his Dad.
  • Likes to fight, contrary what the film is trying to shove down the throat of the audiences.
And that’s it. That is literally all the information about Broly. Once we get into the second half of the film, his supposed character arc abruptly ends and turns into a hulking mess, strip of whatever “personality” he had in the first half. The film never addresses why Broly is uncontrollable nor his Legendary Super Saiyan, excuse me, Full Power is given any thought—things are happening, but at the same time, nothing is happening.

I just cannot see how these things gave any depth to Broly at all—especially since he rarely spoke in the film. Original Broly was quite talkative in his first appearance and combined with cruelty, sadism, and competitive nature; even in his second appearance, his lines (he says Kakarot 12-14 times and uttered one full sentence to Gohan) can sum up as “Get that guy out here so I can get a rematch”.

Perhaps people don’t like that kind of character, so they fetch whatever tack on as an improvement, which is fine, but I don’t see this Broly having any more personality than the original. It’s more or less the same… perhaps even less so.

And honestly, despite the glaring issues the film had with those three, those problems I can overlook due to time restraints or things getting cut for the film. Yet, there is no excuse for Cheerai and Lemo; they are easily the worst characters in the film.

I mentioned before that they seem to dip into this idea that Paragus loved his son (it was done more subtly in the original film, but it was nice to see it here). Yet, these two little shits constantly demonized Paragus back and forth, and the film does nothing to address it, as if the film is trying to leave the audience to see if Paragus and Broly’s relationship is bad or not.

But it doesn’t work in my opinion. Paragus flat out abandoned everything in order to save his son. He spent 41 years together with him—it is clear that Broly had a positive view of him. Another thing is the shock collar as I mentioned before, before Paragus starts the zapper, he talks him down multiple times and when that doesn’t work, he uses it.

What’s worse is that these two barely just met Broly and Cheerai acted like she knew him inside out. It brings down enjoyment of the film whenever she and Lemo appears on screen to talk one thing and another of how Broly truly feels… yet the film consistently shows Broly loving the shit out of this fight. Inf act, when Paragus practically was on his knees trying to get Broly to stop fighting Vegeta and come home when he realized he wasn’t strong enough—it was clear he pretty much stop giving a shit about revenge and wanted to go home, yet, we’re supposedly have to take Cheerai’s words into heart about Broly based on few interactions?

All and all, it is a good film, but the original film, as the Doctor said, did everything this film did, but better. If I were to truly rank all the Broly films, it would be like this:
  • Dragon Ball Z: Broly – The Legendary Super Saiyan (7/10)
  • Dragon Ball Super: Broly (6.5-7/10)
  • Dragon Ball Z: Broly – Second Coming and Bio-Broly (two films that seemingly, for some reason, decides to use the boring characters in the franchise, Trunks and Goten, as main characters.)(4/10 and 2/10)
"You, your family, everyone, will die. Over and over. Mountains of broken bodies, beneath the wheel." - Lich (Crossover, Adventure Time Season 7, episode 23)

I run a general discussion site: https://cosmiccitycrews.com/index.php

User avatar
AnimeNation101
I Live Here
Posts: 2191
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 8:01 pm
Location: Planet ShoJump

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by AnimeNation101 » Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:47 pm

Grimlock wrote:
AnimeNation101 wrote:Just out of curiosity what kinda of past scenes would you have wanted to see
• Yamoshi stuff
• Saiyans vs Tsufurujins war (with a proper AGE established on-screen).
• "41 years ago" adjusted to "46 years ago" (or to whenever the war mentioned above took place).
• A slightly extended cut to King Cold introducing Freeza.
• An extended cut to King Vegeta seeing Vegeta.
• A brief scene showing King Vegeta sending Tarble to another planet.
• A proper "AGE 739" appearing on-screen instead of just "five years later".
• A scene showing Bardock and Leek killing those creatures.
• A great deal of scenes with Gine.
• A scene showing King Vegeta facing Freeza.
• Scenes showing what happened during the one-month timeskip. Bardock getting his headband.
• A proper Bardock vs Freeza scene. With the former going outer space to confront the latter.
• An extended cut to kid Vegeta, kid Raditz and Nappa.
• A brief scene showing what happened to the other two survivors.
• An extended scene depicting Goku arriving on Earth from the manga Jaco, the Galactic Patrolman.

Bonus: • Bardock being captured/saved by a mysterious thing when caught by Freeza's attack. Just a tease for me... :shifty:
AnimeNation101 wrote:and who do you think needed more development?
Bardock, Gine and King Vegeta most definitely. Kid Vegeta, kid Raditz and Nappa as a bonus. With luck, Tarble, one way or another, he also needs it as his brief appearance in the OVA didn't do him justice.
There’s the problem with ur problems. This movie is mainly a Broly story with a segment of it being about Goku and Vegeta fates leading up to meeting Broly. This wasn’t about Yamoshi and the ancient saiyans (as much as I would want it to be), or the Saiyan vs Tuffle war, or even about the the parents of Goku and Vegeta. They’re only there as apart of Goku and Vegeta’s fates leading up to the present. It wasn’t the movie’s job neither did the movie promise that they would explore the adventures of Yamoshi, King Vegeta, Bardock, or the other saiyans that have nothing to do with Broly and his fate tied to Goku’s and Vegeta’s fates, or Yamoshi or the history of the Saiyan race at all for that matter.

And again, while it has been cool, King Vegeta, Bardock, Gine, Nappa, and Raditz don’t have any real importance to the plot/main story of the movie.


All your problems are things you shouldn’t have really been expecting anyway and the lack of it is justified.
ironfist2020 wrote:
AnimeNation101 wrote:
Grimlock wrote:
I actually thought the movie had a fine running time, but like I said, it emphasized the wrong thing. That one hour would have been more well used if it had been dedicated to the past scenes and developed its characters. The last 40 minutes could have been dedicated to the fight scene. Would have been perfect, would have earned this movie the title "Best Dragon Ball movie".

Unfortunately, the people from the production side also prefer fights over story for some reason. Oh well, it seems I can only expect some story from games these days. Kinda weird but it is what it is now.
Just out of curiosity what kinda of past scenes would you have wanted to see and who do you think needed more development?
More bardock and king vegeta. I think a prequal series about the sayians would be the best.
Same response as the one above
I called it that Gogeta, Bardock, and something Broly related would be in the movie before it was even announced that it was a Broly movie. 8)

"I don't think I'm a hero of justice or anythin'. But those who'd hurt my friends... I won't forgive!"

User avatar
PFM18
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 3701
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:23 pm

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by PFM18 » Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:48 pm

Shineman wrote:Perhaps people don’t like that kind of character, so they fetch whatever tack on as an improvement, which is fine, but I don’t see this Broly having any more personality than the original. It’s more or less the same… perhaps even less so.
I'm baffled that anyone could come to this conclusion. He isn't "more or less the same", nor is he similar in any character trait in any real capacity. The differences are expansive, even just using Paragus as an example illustrates how different they are. Old Broly didn't give a shit about his dad, murdered him without hesitation, while this Broly loves him, respects him, listens to him, and was devastated to find that he had been killed. He went ballistic and achieved Super Saiyan upon it being revealed to him. There's literally no similarities whatsoever.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8644
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Grimlock » Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:32 am

AnimeNation101 wrote:This wasn’t about Yamoshi and the ancient saiyans (as much as I would want it to be), or the Saiyan vs Tuffle war
Then the first tagline shouldn't have been something as generalized as stating "origin of Saiyans power". Because that was the first thing it came to mind when the movie was announced in 2017. It would delve more into the past of the Saiyans, not "a brief scene revolving around the past of Goku and Vegeta".
AnimeNation101 wrote:or even about the the parents of Goku and Vegeta
Then they shouldn't be in this movie at all. Otherwise you'd just making the same mistake as Dragon Ball Minus did, with its intention being to tell Goku's depart to Earth but not even trying to develop what is related to it and the characters from that period.
AnimeNation101 wrote:They’re only there as apart of Goku and Vegeta’s fates leading up to the present.
So all those characters are there as an excuse to more senseless fights? Do I have to ignore/not care about story, development, lore and etc, all in the name of more fights in the latter part of the movie? If that's the case then damn... This series is doomed.
AnimeNation101 wrote:It wasn’t the movie’s job neither did the movie promise that they would explore the adventures of Yamoshi, King Vegeta, Bardock, or the other saiyans
It should most definitely be. All about the past of the Saiyans. And if people can't watch Dragon Ball without Goku (though we have evidences that Dragon Ball can indeed live without him for a second), well... It's not like a movie without Goku would kill somebody, people can perfectly live while having/existing a movie without Goku just fine.
AnimeNation101 wrote:And again, while it has been cool, King Vegeta, Bardock, Gine, Nappa, and Raditz don’t have any real importance to the plot/main story of the movie.
Once again this "relevant" argument... And once again I will say: a character does not need to be relevant in order to receive a proper character development. It's because of the lack of that that characters like King Vegeta doesn't get more screentime and is not that much popular. Lack of opportunity to provide something to the story generates lack of popularity that generates less importance. It's a cicle that can only be broken once given such opportunity.

Which, by the way, is not the case of Bardock anymore. He is the one that decided to send Goku to another planet, therefore (and I also said this here before), if Goku is still alive, that is because of Bardock. So if Goku's destiny was to fight that character, Bardock made it possible.
AnimeNation101 wrote:All your problems are things you shouldn’t have really been expecting anyway and the lack of it is justified.
Some are justified, others are not. Most of the things I listed are indeed in the movie, just not properly depicted.

User avatar
Shineman
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: World of Information
Contact:

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Shineman » Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:39 am

PFM18 wrote:
Shineman wrote:Perhaps people don’t like that kind of character, so they fetch whatever tack on as an improvement, which is fine, but I don’t see this Broly having any more personality than the original. It’s more or less the same… perhaps even less so.
I'm baffled that anyone could come to this conclusion. He isn't "more or less the same", nor is he similar in any character trait in any real capacity. The differences are expansive, even just using Paragus as an example illustrates how different they are. Old Broly didn't give a shit about his dad, murdered him without hesitation, while this Broly loves him, respects him, listens to him, and was devastated to find that he had been killed. He went ballistic and achieved Super Saiyan upon it being revealed to him. There's literally no similarities whatsoever.
It could be poor wording on my part, but I meant it that this new Broly having more personality/character than the original does not seem solid. Based on what I saw, he just had much depth as the original did, perhaps even less so since his character arc ends once it enters the second half. There were hints of it in the second half, no doubt, but it wasn’t enough.

It’s a no brainer that this new Broly and the old Broly differs—and I highlighted as such, I’m speaking more on “who has more character”, if that make sense.
"You, your family, everyone, will die. Over and over. Mountains of broken bodies, beneath the wheel." - Lich (Crossover, Adventure Time Season 7, episode 23)

I run a general discussion site: https://cosmiccitycrews.com/index.php

User avatar
Sora Saiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1084
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:19 am
Location: Destiny Islands

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Sora Saiyan » Fri Jan 04, 2019 4:46 am

The gist I’m getting from this movie after reading the more in depth reviews seen on this forum is that Broly, like Freeza in RoF, has been brought in to be used again later, and in Brolys case he will be expanded upon a lot more. This sounds like it’s a brief introduction of his character mixed with fan service (SSJFP), and unique bits (Ikari). Seems like this kind of characterisation will work well as long as it’s expanded upon in the future, as currently Broly has that Tarzan vibe, and he will grow a lot more with the things he has seen and will see. Well hopefully that’s what happens. Honestly I love this kind of character, but it needs to be handled well.

User avatar
Bebi Hatchiyack
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 822
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 4:53 pm

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Bebi Hatchiyack » Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:18 am

I think this film tells something that has never been done before on Dragon Ball, in fact it is necessary to put yourself in the place of Broly and seeing him as the protagonist of the film. All turn around about him. In this movie I remind you here that Broly is a martyr and from the moment when Gogeta appears we have the antagonist of the film that goes as far as to want to kill Broly.
It's very powerful I think, here the heroes are not Goku, nor Vegeta they are here the enemies of the film. We have here a very strong movie who filp the statut of your beloved character into "evil" (mind my quote) character that can go as to kill their opponent who are not a bad guy. I love this formatting.

Here please I hope that everyone will tries to put yourself in the shoes of this Broly to feel pity, to put you in his place to feel him being trapped by his own power that he does not control. To see how in fact this Broly is nor evel but just from the movie point of view a Martyr. A point of view I sayd above.

And it's beautiful, it's poetic, it's huge! Everything I dreamed about for Broly, Toriyama and Toei did it. Because to confess everything I had rewritten Broly in this way in a story that I am conceiving. I had the idea to associate the History of Broly with that of Cooler but there Toei and Toriyama especially we did the job well, I'm happy.
Saiya-jin me, watashi ha kisama wo koroshimasu

User avatar
Luso Saiyan
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1591
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Luso Saiyan » Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:01 am

Sora Saiyan wrote:The gist I’m getting from this movie after reading the more in depth reviews seen on this forum is that Broly, like Freeza in RoF, has been brought in to be used again later,
Freeza in RoF was not brought in to be used again later. He was brought back and returned to where he was at the beginning. It was a self-contained story for the character.

User avatar
FrostByte
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:14 am

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by FrostByte » Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:08 am

Shineman wrote:
PFM18 wrote:
Shineman wrote:Perhaps people don’t like that kind of character, so they fetch whatever tack on as an improvement, which is fine, but I don’t see this Broly having any more personality than the original. It’s more or less the same… perhaps even less so.
I'm baffled that anyone could come to this conclusion. He isn't "more or less the same", nor is he similar in any character trait in any real capacity. The differences are expansive, even just using Paragus as an example illustrates how different they are. Old Broly didn't give a shit about his dad, murdered him without hesitation, while this Broly loves him, respects him, listens to him, and was devastated to find that he had been killed. He went ballistic and achieved Super Saiyan upon it being revealed to him. There's literally no similarities whatsoever.
It could be poor wording on my part, but I meant it that this new Broly having more personality/character than the original does not seem solid. Based on what I saw, he just had much depth as the original did, perhaps even less so since his character arc ends once it enters the second half. There were hints of it in the second half, no doubt, but it wasn’t enough.
Old Broly had depth? That's news to me. I rewatched Movie 8 last week, and I don't know what you're talking about. He's a psychopath who enjoys causing pain to others, and he was traumatized by a crying infant, which was just to make Broly fight Goku because he's the main character and he needs to be involved in someway. King Vegeta was the one who ruined his life and his father's, and he doesn't even go after Vegeta. Speaking of Vegeta, he was horrible in the movie.
Even in the old movie, Broly is a tragic character, but that part is not even explored in the slightest, and you don't feel anything for that character and you only think "Holy shit he looks cool and he's super strong", that's it. He washes everyone without any effort, only for him to later die in the most pathetic way possible. So please tell me how the old Broly movie is better than the new one? I just don't see it.

In DBS Broly, they show you the harsh environment of planet Vampa, and how much of a torture it is for Paragus and Broly to live on such a planet for 41 years. They spend enough time on Broly's character and personality, and it is shown in a way that makes the audience feel bad for Broly and all the things he had to deal with (Horrible weather, no proper food, no water, no civilization). Toriyama/Nagamine also made Broly go for Vegeta first, which is what the first movie should have done anyway. He loses his "personality" and "depth" when he's fighting because he has no control over his powers. He traded his sanity for immense power and this leaves room for improvement/character growth in the future for Broly, which is almost guaranteed from what Goku tells him towards the end of the movie.

User avatar
MCDaveG
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5743
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Prague, Czechia
Contact:

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by MCDaveG » Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:03 am

Do you know when is the home release of the movie? Sadly, I am from country where DB never aired, so no theatre for me and I really do not want to watch the cam rips.
I hope that there will be some early subtitled simulcast for rent. I did bought the Xenoverse 2 DLC and I am kinda bummed that I have the characters before I saw them in context.
FighterZ, Street Fighter 6, Mortal Kombat: Funky_Strudel
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.

User avatar
FrostByte
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:14 am

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by FrostByte » Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:19 am

MCDaveG wrote:Do you know when is the home release of the movie? Sadly, I am from country where DB never aired, so no theatre for me and I really do not want to watch the cam rips.
I hope that there will be some early subtitled simulcast for rent. I did bought the Xenoverse 2 DLC and I am kinda bummed that I have the characters before I saw them in context.
It will most likely be released in June/July.

User avatar
Bebi Hatchiyack
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 822
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 4:53 pm

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Bebi Hatchiyack » Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:49 pm

I've got one ticket for see the movie subbed this january 24th as a movie premiere screening in France I'm so pumped _
Saiya-jin me, watashi ha kisama wo koroshimasu

User avatar
Sora Saiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1084
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:19 am
Location: Destiny Islands

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"

Post by Sora Saiyan » Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:53 pm

Luso Saiyan wrote:
Sora Saiyan wrote:The gist I’m getting from this movie after reading the more in depth reviews seen on this forum is that Broly, like Freeza in RoF, has been brought in to be used again later,
Freeza in RoF was not brought in to be used again later. He was brought back and returned to where he was at the beginning. It was a self-contained story for the character.
Yeah, I said the wrong thing I guess. Obviously it was never intended that Freeza would return after RoF, but the events of RoF allow the return of Freeza to seem feasible and an added bonus being that he is on the level of our heroes. I should’ve went into detail and clarified that.

Post Reply