Vic Mignogna

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
excelhedge
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by excelhedge » Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:42 pm

XanatosVanBadass wrote: There are plenty of links out there. Even in this thread. They’re a tad more credible than click baiting YouTube videos, but maybe we should keep this simple for you. Putting aside his fans that have accused him, why would staff and fellow VAs have a reason to lie about this? If they are lying they’re putting themselves in a spectacular position to get sued. Answer me that.
And how many of these links are creditable? Backed up with hard evidence? How many are just BS rumors.

I already stated this twice now.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=43529&start=1000#p1579964

viewtopic.php?p=1580047#p1579993

I have no doubts on both sides. I don't believe random online stories without proof. None of this It happened to me/friend of a friend at random con crap is believable. As anyone can make up a storyon the internet.

Nor do I believe Funimation fired Vic without reason due to their own investigation. Or from whatever happen behind the scenes with Funimation's staff and Vic.

Unless it's taken to a court of law thus open to the public no one will known what is true or straight BS.

User avatar
PFM18
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 3701
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:23 pm

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by PFM18 » Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:59 pm

SaintEvolution wrote:Being honest, most of the accusations seems to be true, even Vic know that and apologized in a recent video. But what happened with Monica Rial in the last two days made me to think again in some of the points that were thrown in the entire discussion.
He apologized for his actions and said he would never do it again, but it's worth noting that this doesn't contradict the words in his original apology saying that any accusations of sexual assault/harassment are false. Because well, people are accusing him of sexual assault despite there being no sexual assault testimonies/andecdotes, nor any evidence whatsoever.
JulieYBM wrote: I love how you downplay sexual assault
You mind specifying these cases of sexual assault? I have seen no such thing. Sexual assault is "sexual contact without consent" and none of these cases even accuse him of such a thing. Has anybody claimed he had grabbed anybody's boob? Or touching their vagina? Or vigorously made out with them without consent? No, none of the above. Nothing that constitutes sexual assault and you throwing around this term nonchalantly is deeply troubling.
Last edited by PFM18 on Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BlueChi
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:34 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by BlueChi » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:10 pm

JulieYBM wrote:I love how you downplay sexual assault an abuse over sixteen years as 'misadventures' so you can shame the defenders of victims as being fringe loonatics.

By which I mean: go fuck yourself.

--Julie
As someone who was sexually assaulted in a past relationship of mine, I'd thank you if you didn't compare what's been shown to us in the pictures to what I and a lot of other people had to go through. Not trying to defend Vic either, there's a lot of accusations so he almost certainly has a habit of beeing needlessly touchy. But that isn't sexual assault. Don't make light of it.

User avatar
PFM18
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 3701
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:23 pm

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by PFM18 » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:14 pm

BlueChi wrote:
JulieYBM wrote:I love how you downplay sexual assault an abuse over sixteen years as 'misadventures' so you can shame the defenders of victims as being fringe loonatics.

By which I mean: go fuck yourself.

--Julie
As someone who was sexually assaulted in a past relationship of mine, I'd thank you if you didn't compare what's been shown to us in the pictures to what I and a lot of other people had to go through. Not trying to defend Vic either, there's a lot of accusations so he almost certainly has a habit of beeing needlessly touchy. But that isn't sexual assault. Don't make light of it.
THANK YOU HOLY SHIT. That's what I've been saying. Calling what Vic has done "sexual assault" marginalizes actual sexual assault victims and mischaracterizes it's very nature. As somebody who knows many people personally who are victims of sexual assault, I'm sure they would be bothered by people lumping kisses on the cheek/forehead with their cases of felony acts of sexual assault. It downplays actual sexual assault and is insulting to their victims. Making light of extremely serious crimes such as sexual assault is disgusting and JulieYBM needs to stop doing it. Extremely insensitive shit.

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by MasenkoHA » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:31 pm

BlueChi wrote:
JulieYBM wrote:I love how you downplay sexual assault an abuse over sixteen years as 'misadventures' so you can shame the defenders of victims as being fringe loonatics.

By which I mean: go fuck yourself.

--Julie
As someone who was sexually assaulted in a past relationship of mine, I'd thank you if you didn't compare what's been shown to us in the pictures to what I and a lot of other people had to go through. Not trying to defend Vic either, there's a lot of accusations so he almost certainly has a habit of beeing needlessly touchy. But that isn't sexual assault. Don't make light of it.

Not only that but calling it sexual assault or rape is giving the Pro-Vic crowd more ammo to dismiss the accusations.


Vic is a goddamn creep who, as I said before, deserves to be fired and barred from cons. But until we have further evidence let’s save the rape and sexual assault statements

What Vic is doing is bad and we shouldn’t make light of it or dismiss the feelings of real women who were made uncomfortable by Vic’s inappropriate advances but let’s not treat it the same as rape

User avatar
Appers
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:57 pm

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Appers » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:59 pm

This is quite unfortunate to hear honestly. If Vic really has done some fucked up shit then by all means he should be punished for it, but I feel like something really needs to be said.


You guys are being complete assholes to one another regarding the topic of Vic's innocence. If people disagree and feel as though they require more proof, or are hardset on believing the evidence presented so far as truthful, that's literally no fucking excuse for either side to start going into a verbal attack on the people who see the situation differently. How on earth are you ever going to convince people to see things from your side if all you do is insult and come off as unreasonable, even if the proof is there? If you've done everything you can to have a civil discussion about it and they still don't see eye to eye with you then oh fucking well, their loss.

I get that its a touchy subject that hits many people perhaps a bit too close to home for their liking, but it's literally bringing out the worst in everybody and it's really making me question whether or not I even want to continue to be a part of this community if this is the way people treat each other around here when they come to disagreements on more personal and serious subjects.

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Cursed Lemon » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:20 pm

BlueChi wrote: As someone who was sexually assaulted in a past relationship of mine, I'd thank you if you didn't compare what's been shown to us in the pictures to what I and a lot of other people had to go through. Not trying to defend Vic either, there's a lot of accusations so he almost certainly has a habit of beeing needlessly touchy. But that isn't sexual assault. Don't make light of it.
What is this, the Trauma Olympics? Vic doesn't have to be facing multiple years in jail for what he's been accused of doing (which is a lot more than just the pictures that happen to have been posted here, if you've been following along at all) to fit the definition of sexual assault. Nevermind the fact that he apparently has a particular habit of doing this to underage girls.

Like JulieYBM said, don't downplay this because someone else somewhere might've had it worse. It's not about whether he completely destroyed any particular girl's life or not with what he did, it's that he's a serial offender.
Appers wrote:I get that its a touchy subject that hits many people perhaps a bit too close to home for their liking, but it's literally bringing out the worst in everybody and it's really making me question whether or not I even want to continue to be a part of this community if this is the way people treat each other around here when they come to disagreements on more personal and serious subjects.
lol

So, what if someone here just came out and said something like, "fuck LGBT people", or anything similar? Does that cross this arbitrary threshold of an opinion being appropriate/tolerable/respectable to you?

Because IHMO and in the opinion of many others, disbelieving people who are claiming sexual assault - disbelieving dozens implicating the same person - is a reprehensible, fully-loaded, ass backwards, and all around shitty viewpoint that doesn't deserve a shred of respect.
Last edited by Cursed Lemon on Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

User avatar
Guntank
Newbie
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:08 am
Contact:

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Guntank » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:25 pm

excelhedge wrote:
XanatosVanBadass wrote: There are plenty of links out there. Even in this thread. They’re a tad more credible than click baiting YouTube videos, but maybe we should keep this simple for you. Putting aside his fans that have accused him, why would staff and fellow VAs have a reason to lie about this? If they are lying they’re putting themselves in a spectacular position to get sued. Answer me that.
And how many of these links are creditable? Backed up with hard evidence? How many are just BS rumors.

I already stated this twice now.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=43529&start=1000#p1579964

viewtopic.php?p=1580047#p1579993

I have no doubts on both sides. I don't believe random online stories without proof. None of this It happened to me/friend of a friend at random con crap is believable. As anyone can make up a storyon the internet.

Nor do I believe Funimation fired Vic without reason due to their own investigation. Or from whatever happen behind the scenes with Funimation's staff and Vic.

Unless it's taken to a court of law thus open to the public no one will known what is true or straight BS.
Let me get on my time machine to 2006 and put body cams on all the females so we can give you, your hard stone cold facts.
You clearly are rather ignorant in this matter and are parroting exactly the same thing that the "red pill media "YouTubers keep feeding their ignorant fanbases.

I believe you have over 50 pages to read up and establish your own opinion and make your own thought-out analysis.

User avatar
KBABZ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5227
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:38 pm
Location: The tallest tower in West City

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by KBABZ » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:31 pm

I will say that I think the behaviour of some people here has gotten unnecessarily hostile. Yes we're sick of people coming in uninformed and unsympathetic. No that does not mean we have the right to swear at them and call them incredibly derogatory names for no reason.

User avatar
excelhedge
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by excelhedge » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:35 pm

Guntank wrote:
excelhedge wrote:
XanatosVanBadass wrote: There are plenty of links out there. Even in this thread. They’re a tad more credible than click baiting YouTube videos, but maybe we should keep this simple for you. Putting aside his fans that have accused him, why would staff and fellow VAs have a reason to lie about this? If they are lying they’re putting themselves in a spectacular position to get sued. Answer me that.
And how many of these links are creditable? Backed up with hard evidence? How many are just BS rumors.

I already stated this twice now.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=43529&start=1000#p1579964

viewtopic.php?p=1580047#p1579993

I have no doubts on both sides. I don't believe random online stories without proof. None of this It happened to me/friend of a friend at random con crap is believable. As anyone can make up a storyon the internet.

Nor do I believe Funimation fired Vic without reason due to their own investigation. Or from whatever happen behind the scenes with Funimation's staff and Vic.

Unless it's taken to a court of law thus open to the public no one will known what is true or straight BS.
Let me get on my time machine to 2006 and put body cams on all the females so we can give you, your hard stone cold facts.
You clearly are rather ignorant in this matter and are parroting exactly the same thing that the "red pill media "YouTubers keep feeding their ignorant fanbases.

I believe you have over 50 pages to read up and establish your own opinion and make your own thought-out analysis.
It's kinda getting pathetic now, you guys a so quick to attack anyone that doesn't 100% agree with you mob mentality that it's quickly becoming a joke.

I've already stated my veiw on the subject 3 times now.

I'll wait till actual hard evidence comes out before I condem the man.

User avatar
Polyphase Avatron
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Polyphase Avatron » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:37 pm

From all of the evidence I've seen, I can say with 99% certainty that he's guilty. And that's good enough IMO.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147

User avatar
BlueChi
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:34 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by BlueChi » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:39 pm

Cursed Lemon wrote:
BlueChi wrote: As someone who was sexually assaulted in a past relationship of mine, I'd thank you if you didn't compare what's been shown to us in the pictures to what I and a lot of other people had to go through. Not trying to defend Vic either, there's a lot of accusations so he almost certainly has a habit of beeing needlessly touchy. But that isn't sexual assault. Don't make light of it.
What is this, the Trauma Olympics? Vic doesn't have to be facing multiple years in jail for what he's been accused of doing (which is a lot more than just the pictures that happen to have been posted here, if you've been following along at all) to fit the definition of sexual assault. Nevermind the fact that he apparently has a particular habit of doing this to underage girls.

Like JulieYBM said, don't downplay this because someone else somewhere might've had it worse. It's not about whether he completely destroyed any particular girl's life or not with what he did, it's that he's a serial offender.
I appreciate the empathy, but no. It isn't sexual assault. He still needs to suffer the consequences, but what he did wasn't rape (as far as we know). It was unprofessional, uncomfortable, creepy and it still wasn't sexual assault. Were that the case, you'd need to press charges with a lot of people in small European towns and villages. I'm sorry that someone calling you out on the fact that you're using other peoples' pain for your own optics pressed you so, but someone had to.

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Cursed Lemon » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:50 pm

BlueChi wrote:It isn't sexual assault. He still needs to suffer the consequences, but what he did wasn't rape (as far as we know). It was unprofessional, uncomfortable, creepy and it still wasn't sexual assault. Were that the case, you'd need to press charges with a lot of people in small European towns and villages. I'm sorry that someone calling you out on the fact that you're using other peoples' pain for your own optics pressed you so, but someone had to.
I'm really enjoying the elaborate strings of adjectives that people are compiling to describe what he did since they know that it doesn't fall under any definition other than sexual assault, but let's just entertain this silly line of thought for a minute. Sexual assault is already loosely but effectively the "manslaughter" version of rape, but let's imagine a scenario in which there is a "manslaughter" version of sexual assault since that's what you're implicitly suggesting.

What difference does it make? He's still being implicated en masse of sexual misconduct, and you're over here bickering about the etymology of the phrase "sexual assault"?
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 17654
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: 🏳️‍⚧️🍉

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by JulieYBM » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:57 pm

KBABZ wrote:I will say that I think the behaviour of some people here has gotten unnecessarily hostile. Yes we're sick of people coming in uninformed and unsympathetic. No that does not mean we have the right to swear at them and call them incredibly derogatory names for no reason.
Decorum policing does nobody any good in contexts of importance. People are defending a man accussed of mass sexual and verbal assault. That's much more offensive than a couple of 'bad words'.
💙💜💖 She/Her 💙💜💖
💙💜💖 Don't forget to take your estrogen! 💙💜💖

User avatar
BlueChi
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:34 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by BlueChi » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:01 pm

Cursed Lemon wrote:
BlueChi wrote:It isn't sexual assault. He still needs to suffer the consequences, but what he did wasn't rape (as far as we know). It was unprofessional, uncomfortable, creepy and it still wasn't sexual assault. Were that the case, you'd need to press charges with a lot of people in small European towns and villages. I'm sorry that someone calling you out on the fact that you're using other peoples' pain for your own optics pressed you so, but someone had to.
I'm really enjoying the elaborate strings of adjectives that people are compiling to describe what he did since they know that it doesn't fall under any definition other than sexual assault, but let's just entertain this silly line of thought for a minute. Sexual assault is already loosely but effectively the "manslaughter" version of rape, but let's imagine a scenario in which there is a "manslaughter" version of sexual assault since that's what you're implicitly suggesting.

What difference does it make? He's still being implicated en masse of sexual misconduct, and you're over here bickering about the etymology of the phrase "sexual assault"?
Instead of being livid at the "what difference does it make?" remark, I'll just try and enjoy the very darkly humorous fact that someone who's insulting others over not buying the severity of Vic's hugs and pats is telling someone who went through sexual assault what basically amounts to "lol, what do you know?".
This is severely out of your depth. People are being incredibly naive when they blindly defend Vic, but you're using other people's pain to support your petty internet spat and you mock them when you're called out. Take solace in that.

TheNingen
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by TheNingen » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:17 pm

Going to put my two cents in here and get blasted for it. But I care not.

Both sides have parts of their arguments that are not wrong.

The #IStandWithVic side is not wrong for wanting evidence and proof. I'm sorry, but no. Spoken word and second hand accounts are NOT evidence or proof. Vic is Italian. Older Italian people are very physically affectionate. While it is NOT an excuse, there are several instances and screencaps going around where people are being used as evidence AGAINST Vic, then finding out and saying "My experience was turned into something it isn't."

There are screencaps of groups purposely saying they're going to photoshop evidence to use against Vic. There are screencaps of Monical Rial sending flirty, kissy emojis to Vic, someone who she is "terrified of." Most of the stories are extremely hyperbolic, and easy to dismiss. There is no one that can rightfully argue that in a convention room of 2,000+ people (where one of the said 'attacks' took place), that nobody would catch wind of, or record videos/pictures of Vic forcefully grabbing someone's hair back and pushing them against a booth desk. That's absurd. And many of the videos/pictures that HAVE come out, people are judging without context. Are the people in said pictures actually coming out against him? I certainly haven't seen a record of this.

I recently was involved in an experience where I got involved with a girl. She treated me shitty. She abused me and then tossed me aside. Then when I told my friends about her behavior, she got angry and tried to actively get me expelled from school saying I was stalking her and doing a whole bunch of other crap that I didn't do and that I was doing this to "more girls than just her." I do not believe the "less than 10% of sexual assault reports are fake" because it's impossible to get an accurate sample size or truthful report of such a thing.

As for the argument of "Why would they feel the need to lie about this when they have nothing to gain?" They have EVERYTHING to gain coming forward. They don't like Vic. They get rid of Vic. And then are praised as heroes and get more publicity and attention. And this is only IF the allegations are false. They have nowhere to go but 'up.' Even with the harassment, the damage done to them will always be minimal when in comparison to the fallout and damage done to Vic. Except they go up the elevator, Vic goes down. Nothing negative happens to their careers or financial stability UNLESS they are found out to be lying. Again, most recollections or recounts of encounters are so vague, they're missing details, they're general or not focused. I'm sorry, but a sexual assault survivor would remember things in detail. because it was traumatic. The girl I currently love remembers her abuse by her ex in vivid detail. There are several reasons to not believe many of the "survivors" out there right now. And even then, they are not sexual assault survivors. Unless Vic forced himself onto them, and groped them or penetrated them, they weren't sexually assaulted. Hugging and kissing unwantedly, especially just done affectionately and whatnot, is NOT sexual assault. The two need to stop being conflated.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The #KickVic side, is not wrong for being outraged at Vic's actions. There are also screencaps of his group the Risembool Rangers being asked by him to go out there and fight the allegations and dismiss them, the group itself is helmed by Vic's mother. If the stories of him bringing teenagers to his room and having inappropriate relations is true, then there is every reason to be up in arms. It's fine to view his actions as creepy. He's older, and they're minors. But again, context matters. It matters if the people in said pictures gave him consent to hug, and if their parents were there and fine with it. Again, the people largely involved are outside audiences giving their inputs with the limited information they have.

It's perfectly logical as an argument to say that people without contact who have similar experiences in large numbers must mean there's trouble in River City. But you also need to ask if they are reliable. To which human beings aren't always. Also voice actors like Sean, Chris and Sonny basically having issues with him leads to their own addition to the problem to look at. With Sean doing a parody of Vic talking about wanting to have sex with boys under 12.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This all being said, I have problems with the conduct of both sides. Both sides have people being childish. Both sides have people being juvenile. And this useless attacking of one another is completely fruitless. There is plenty of foul play going on with BOTH sides of the board. Both sides have plenty of reason to be outraged with the involved voice actors and the sides they are arguing against because both have valid arguments.

Sexual assault is no laughing matter. And I'm sad to say I'm sure many people on the boards, including myself, have been victims of sexual assault, and are disgusted and turned off by those calling a lot of these actions and gestures by Vic under that banner. That being said, Vic SHOULD have exercised more caution and awareness in that maybe not everyone is receptive to his type of personality. But that is also their responsibility to say so at the time--Which maybe they did. No one here can say. All I'm saying is, blind belief in one side due to liking or disliking Vic is not the way to go about things. As I said, there are several instances of foul play and not okay shit going on with BOTH sides that can lead one to question. Remember the phrase: Cui bono? It's important in sides like this.

Listen to people. But don't blindly believe. People are unreliable narrators. They do shitty things for reasons only they know. Evidence is how we prove the truth of the matter. It is not bad to wait for it or want it. But it is also not wrong to listen to people's stories and then use your own judgments after researching to come to your own conclusion.

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Cursed Lemon » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:19 pm

BlueChi wrote: Instead of being livid at the "what difference does it make?" remark, I'll just try and enjoy the very darkly humorous fact that someone who's insulting others over not buying the severity of Vic's hugs and pats is telling someone who went through sexual assault what basically amounts to "lol, what do you know?".
...Hey Julie, thoughts? Concerns?
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7676
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by jjgp1112 » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:23 pm

The group that everybody is pointing to as "faking evidence" was actually one troll actively trying to weaken the group's cause and make them look bad, and was immediately banned and shut down by the group.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

TheNingen
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by TheNingen » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:30 pm

Except it was more than the Facebook group who had incidents of that, so....The argument is still valid.

User avatar
Cursed Lemon
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1407
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Re: Vic Mignogna

Post by Cursed Lemon » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:30 pm

TheNingen wrote:They have EVERYTHING to gain coming forward. They don't like Vic.
Maybe they don't like Vic because he sexually assaulted them.

This is the most utterly ridiculous line of thinking when it comes to situations like these, and it's got a perfect parallel in the whole Brett Kavanaugh situation. People kept saying, "oh this is a power play by the Democrats, they put multiple women up to falsely accusing Brett Kavanaugh".

Okay, smart guys, if it was just a power play...you ever heard of a little guy named Neil Gorsuch? You know, the SCOTUS judge installed by President Trump before Kavanaugh? The one whom the Democrats might've actually had a semi-legitimate reason to try to pull some shady shit with given the fact that the open seat was completely stolen from them by the Republican fuckasses in Congress?

Where were the sexual assault allegations then? Why didn't the Democrats open up on Gorsuch?

Maybe because Neil Gorsuch never sexually assaulted anyone.

So where are the mass sexual assault allegations against, oh say, Sean Schemmel? After all, it's no secret that Sean isn't particularly well-liked in some professional circles. I know we've got a single account out there somewhere, but where is the wave of voice actor colleagues coming forward to falsely accuse him of crimes he didn't commit?

Maybe because he didn't commit dozens of sexual assaults. Thus the lack of allegations.
Special Beam Cannon!

(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃

Locked