Oh yeah, I'm sadly familiar. It's the Shapiro-style "gamification" of discussion and debate. It's not about having an actual conversation and trying to arrive at the truth; it's a pure dominance game, winning by any means necessary, which is why it usually jumps to exhausting, abusing and humiliating the "enemy" extremely fast.Shaddy wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2019 6:03 pm What you need to understand is that these are people who legitimately do not care if their arguments make sense. Their stance isn't about being right. It's about winning.
Any sane person who's not too naive or rock fucking stupid can do ten minutes of research to see that A. Vic's behavior is inappropriate and B. This is why he was fired and banned from cons. There is 1000% certain proof of that absolutely fucking everywhere, and it's all the conversation was originally about.
But that doesn't matter. Because his supporters were never working within facts and proof in the first place. It has always, always been governed by emotions. They're not acting like this because they're stupid. They know what they're doing and they're not ashamed. They legitimately do not possess the conscience to act reasonably here.
And yeah, it's especially disgusting when it's over actual important issues that are hurting people and affecting their lives. It's all turned into a game to them, so they don't even consider empathy or decency.
Can you, though? There may be some instances of some individuals taking things to extremes, there always are, but ultimately I feel the "KickVic" side is coming from a genuine place - they believe Mignogna is a serial abuser, and their goal is to protect more vulnerable people from being victimized by him. Whether or not you share their belief, I don't think you can say their intention is malicious.Mooreish wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2019 6:14 pm You can say the same on the kickvic side. The people saying listen and believe is the exact same as that.
Meanwhile, look at any thread from the other side and take note of how much disgusting and cruel behaviour you see.
It's been explained multiple times in this thread why it's so hard to prove these cases in a court of law. If someone forces their tongue down your throat or gropes you in private, or without any physical evidence, what "proof" do you have? It's not so simple a matter as "take it to court", and there's a reason so many assaults aren't reported to the police - these are charges that are highly likely to be thrown out because there's no way to definitively prove them.Mooreish wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2019 6:14 pm Hearing something and expecting it to be true is a dangerous thing nowadays. you need a bit of doubt. If you don’t, it’s just mob mentality. This is why courts exist. Why can’t people just rely on courts like they did on Cosby?
As for Cosby, I'll answer a question with a question: if more people had believed his accusers and taken them seriously in the first place, do you think maybe it wouldn't have taken decades for him to face consequences for his actions?




