You can think of something as silly shallow crowdpleasing prolefeed and still be angry that someone adapts it wrong.Soppa Saia People wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:07 am i'm like a week late to this, and to be honest he's not wrong, but i will say i do think it's kinda ironic to hear torishima just think it's a dumb manga, when in his Forbes interview he said he was displeased with the dragon ball anime because they weren't taking it seriously enough. obviously there's some difference, and having people recall their exact feelings on things 30+ years ago is bound to result in some contradictions (part of why i don't really put a ton of stock in toriyama interviews as fun and interesting as they are to read), but just thought it was funny.
I mean, hell, think of all the people who are outraged that virtually every piece of Dragon Ball media made in the past two decades, up to the literal last couple of years, felt like cheap shovelware trash or borderline a bootleg. Dragon Ball being the same serious these types usually claim they only watch for the fights (& otherwise stick to DBZA). And that's when they aren't watching YouTube videos that seriously and almost hilariously make Dragon Ball out to be this modern epic with characters of such profound depth that they're on par with a Dostoevsky or Tolstoy novel.
"How could they they do this to Dragon Ball?" is a common refrain. Because the people making it don't seem to take it anywhere near as seriously as the fans do. To them, it's just a silly elementary schoolkid's kung fu cartoon in an era where kung fu movies are well past the point of parody and past their prime, and it's going to make money anyway. So naturally you're going to see some shitty art and animation, gimmicky games with no depth, corners cut until they're round, unrealized potential, and a general air of "We love the series, but not for the same reason you do."

