Yes. Bardock appeared in the original manga in a panel that was meant to be a homage to the special, but that special is not canon to the original manga. Minus is. Basically, the character Bardock is canon, but not the special as a whole.ArmenianPepsi wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:13 pmActually didn't Toriyama have Frieza make a remark about Goku resembling Bardock in the manga?WittyUsername wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:00 pm The Bardock special is non-canon, but it’s infinitely better than Minus.
Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
-
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
"Canon" is almost entirely irrelevant to me, and it doesn't affect my enjoyment or consideration of things whatsoever. Inversely, if I've determined for myself that something is steaming garbage (like Super), then I have no qualms about completely disregarding it, no matter how current it is or how much people may insist on its supposed "canonicity."
[ BlueSky | Bsky: DBS Plots | DeviantArt | Twitter (Depreciated) ]
[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]
[PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader | Switch FC: SW-4304-7361-2824 | ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone") ]
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
I still can prefer non-canon content like the two TV specials over Toriyama's manga versions. To be honest, it might only be a small group of online gatekeeper types that make a big deal about canon since Toei's Broly and SSJ4 are still popular. Not sure if it's the same thing but I prefer to think of them as existing in seperate continuities rather canon vs non-canon.
This topic reminds me of what Toriyama said about RoF:
I guess you could say that some things are difficult for anyone but the original author to write, because only the original author can freely mess around with what’s already been established. A scriptwriter would get tied up trying not to screw with the original story, so in that respect they’d probably have a harder time messing around with things.
I do think fans are willing to accept more from the author. Not necessarily for the reasons of canon but because it's the closest fans can get to the original story's style of writing. I didn't like RoF at all or most of DBS but just trying to look at it from a different perspective
.
This topic reminds me of what Toriyama said about RoF:
I guess you could say that some things are difficult for anyone but the original author to write, because only the original author can freely mess around with what’s already been established. A scriptwriter would get tied up trying not to screw with the original story, so in that respect they’d probably have a harder time messing around with things.
I do think fans are willing to accept more from the author. Not necessarily for the reasons of canon but because it's the closest fans can get to the original story's style of writing. I didn't like RoF at all or most of DBS but just trying to look at it from a different perspective

I like how Bardock in that manga panel still looks like the original and not the headband-less Minus Bardock.WittyUsername wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 1:33 amYes. Bardock appeared in the original manga in a panel that was meant to be a homage to the special, but that special is not canon to the original manga. Minus is. Basically, the character Bardock is canon, but not the special as a whole.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
It shouldn't for you or anyone else, as that's not its purpose. Canon is meant to show what's being taken into account by the current writer, it has nothing to do with what's good or bad, yet some fans use it for such purposes. What's canon today may not be so tomorrow, and vice versa.Kaboom wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 2:12 am"Canon" doesn't affect my enjoyment or consideration of things whatsoever.
If I've determined for myself that something is steaming garbage (like Super), then I have no qualms about completely disregarding it, no matter how current it is or how much people may insist on its supposed "canonicity."
I completely agree. If Super were to be left behind by whoever takes over the franchise after Toriyama, watch a lot of its defenders throw it under the bus.
God forbid someone give a sh*t about what came before.Skar wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 3:28 am"A scriptwriter would get tied up trying not to screw with the original story..."
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
I liked the Daizenshuu 4 interview where he talks about trying to keep things consistent. There was also this from a V-Jump interview about BoG:Matches Malone wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:06 amGod forbid someone give a sh*t about what came before.
Now then, on a different note, in this movie, a variety of new story elements have been revealed. For example, I believe there’s “Beerus’s Castle” that appears at the beginning, and “the reason why Planet Kaiō is small”; could you tell us about that sort of thing?
The design for Beerus’s castle was fun to come up with. When I’m thinking up a story, somehow, I want to make things consistent. No matter if he’s a God of Destruction, it would be bad if he just showed up for no reason and went on a rampage, wouldn’t it? Even I myself think that feels wrong.…. So, even if it’s not expressed within the work, I always work to come up with a convincing background story within myself.
I think Toriyama cares about maintaining consistency when he can so I'm not sure what was going on with RoF. I just thought it was relevant to this topic since Toriyama is flat-out saying only the original author could mess with what's been established which is true if we consider how non-Toriyama stories are criticized sometimes.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
RF and everything after it. BOG was such a great movie that Toriyama tried as hard as he could to not only fit it within the manga, but to also live up to it. After that though, he seemed to have lost his passion again, which I guess isn't surprising considering he only intended BOG being a one time project, and not what it actually turned out to be.Skar wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:49 amI think Toriyama cares about maintaining consistency when he can so I'm not sure what was going on with RoF.
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
Aren’t there Even some contradictions between the The EOZ and Super?jamiljamtheman wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:18 pmI believe Super operates under the assumption that only the manga covering Dragon Ball and Z has happened. It takes place in between the Buu Arc and the time skip at the end of Dragon Ball Z, so well before GT. But it does not hold itself to needing GT to happen in its future—it already contradicts GT by de aging pilaf and de fusing kibito Kai. Super Saiyan 4 “hasn’t happened yet”, but I think because of GTs “non canon” status, it either won’t happen “canonically” at all or will happen differently.B e n wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 5:58 pm
I personally don't enjoy Super as much. I enjoy the development of the DB Universe, but I don't understand the timeline. Is it pre or post GT? Has Vegeta skipped not only Super Saiyan 3 but perhaps Super Saiyan 4? Has that not happened yet, or is it just not acknowledged? A parallel universe? The Broly movie left me a little salty because of that.
It’s needlessly confusing, but DB->Z->Super is it’s own timeline, and it’s assumed the old movies and GT never happened/will happen. It also is the “canon” timeline because it is the most Toriyama led.
That said, on the topic of the topic question, I very much enjoy “non canon” content. I enjoy GT, the Z movies, and SDBH plenty. Don’t let something being not “canon” detract from your enjoyment of it! I kinda wish that modern DB had been constructed in a way that it still fit with GT in the timeline/picture. But alas.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
As of now, GT isn't canon, as there are simply too many things in Super that contradict it. With that said though, it's entirely possible that Super will end with everything being reset to how it was before they met Beerus, or that GT could be introduced as an alternate timeline, etc. There's also the possibility that Super as a whole could be ignored like how GT currently is once Toriyama steps down.jamiljamtheman wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:18 pmI believe Super operates under the assumption that only the manga covering Dragon Ball and Z has happened. It takes place in between the Buu Arc and the time skip at the end of Dragon Ball Z, so well before GT. But it does not hold itself to needing GT to happen in its future—it already contradicts GT by de aging pilaf and de fusing kibito Kai. Super Saiyan 4 “hasn’t happened yet”, but I think because of GTs “non canon” status, it either won’t happen “canonically” at all or will happen differently.
The Bardock special is in the same position that GT is, both were "canon" for the longest time, but that changed once modern DB began.ArmenianPepsi wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:13 pmActually didn't Toriyama have Frieza make a remark about Goku resembling Bardock in the manga?
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
You mean the Dragon Ball Super manga "operates under that assumption"? Because its anime follows the anime continuity, as we see Gregory, Trunks' first transformation and other things.jamiljamtheman wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:18 pmI believe Super operates under the assumption that only the manga covering Dragon Ball and Z has happened.
Only one so far, and it can easily be solved (but not for long if they keep cramming stories in this period of time). Bulma says her and her family haven't seen Goku for five years. That establishes they shouldn't have been seeing each other since Future Trunks saga, as is the last saga of AGE 779. But considering we're just one year ahead of that, we can assume Bulma rounded it up, and they actually haven't seen each other for about four years and X months.Goten_jr wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:30 amAren’t there Even some contradictions between the The EOZ and Super?
We can't afford to have more timeskips now, otherwise we'll jump to AGE 781 and that solution will no longer be possible.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20409
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
There's caring about what came before and then there's being anal retentive about consistency to the point of it interfering with the story even though plot holes generally don't matter to audiences.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- SSJGAffleck
- Not-So-Newbie
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:37 pm
- Location: PE, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
I mean a lot of the movies are still really fun and I watch movie 12 and the 10th anniversary movie at least 5 times each year. I love GT and think it's way better than Super with the exception of BOG(Movie) and Broly. The first TV special is still perfect in my eyes and Minus does not even compare.
But there really isn't a canon, and everything can be seen as just as valid as another if you look at it in terms of alternate timelines.
But there really isn't a canon, and everything can be seen as just as valid as another if you look at it in terms of alternate timelines.
"Your father was an average fighter, but a bRiLlIaNt sCiEnTIsT!"- Brian Drummond's pitch-perfect voice
- SupremeKai25
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4664
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
I'm not. The last non-canon Dragon Ball content I followed was Super Dragon Ball Heroes, but I dropped it a few months ago. I really have a hard time following what's happening in all of these non-canon stories, most of the events seem random and disconnected from each others. At this point I'm waiting for a new Super movie/Anime Moro arc.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with ToyotaroAt his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
The "canon" is what's being taken into account by the head writer (Toriyama), which is the stories he himself wrote only. That doesn't make everything else less valid, or mean that things can't change once someone else takes over in the future. GT for example is clearly not being taken into account by Toriyama, but once he's done, the new writer could easily connect both it and Super together, making GT "canon" again.SSJGAffleck wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:55 amThere really isn't a canon, and everything can be seen as just as valid as another if you look at it in terms of alternate timelines.
- SSJGAffleck
- Not-So-Newbie
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:37 pm
- Location: PE, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
True. I should have said that the way I look at the canon not the way it is. That’s my badMatches Malone wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 12:50 pmThe "canon" is what's being taken into account by the head writer (Toriyama), which is the stories he himself wrote only. That doesn't make everything else less valid, or mean that things can't change once someone else takes over in the future. GT for example is clearly not being taken into account by Toriyama, but once he's done, the new writer could easily connect both it and Super together, making GT "canon" again.SSJGAffleck wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:55 amThere really isn't a canon, and everything can be seen as just as valid as another if you look at it in terms of alternate timelines.
"Your father was an average fighter, but a bRiLlIaNt sCiEnTIsT!"- Brian Drummond's pitch-perfect voice
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
'Canon' is the dumbest shit word on the planet and if I could turn it into a Dragon Ball enemy and then write for it to be brutally defeated by Son Gokuu and Videl while babysitting the kids and discussing the merits of gas versus charcoal I would.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
If you're talking about how fans use it, then I agree, but the concept itself (what an author takes into account while writing) is needed for a franchise as big as DB.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20409
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
One of the main issues with Canon is people want the concept to be this rigid concept and like a puzzle where all the pieces fit together.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
I don't think that whether or not something's canon determines its value (see: the Star Wars EU), but I'm not the biggest fan of content that doesn't have a certain degree of involvement from a series' original creator. Something like Heroes just comes across as someone playing with DB action figures rather than a legitimate story. That doesn't mean there can't be anything non-canon I don't like though.
I prefer to use the term continuity. I like the DB-Z-Super continuity better than the DB-Z-GT continuity, but there are things from non-canon material like the movies that I like.
I prefer to use the term continuity. I like the DB-Z-Super continuity better than the DB-Z-GT continuity, but there are things from non-canon material like the movies that I like.
Favorite sagas: Tien Shinhan (DB), Frieza (Z), Future Trunks (Super)
Favorite characters: Frieza, Future Trunks, Beerus, Android 17, Zamasu, Gohan
Favorite characters: Frieza, Future Trunks, Beerus, Android 17, Zamasu, Gohan
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
I mean Toriyama declared GT as Side Story of it’s own Work so He kinda took it into his accountMatches Malone wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 12:50 pmThe "canon" is what's being taken into account by the head writer (Toriyama), which is the stories he himself wrote only. That doesn't make everything else less valid, or mean that things can't change once someone else takes over in the future. GT for example is clearly not being taken into account by Toriyama, but once he's done, the new writer could easily connect both it and Super together, making GT "canon" again.SSJGAffleck wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:55 amThere really isn't a canon, and everything can be seen as just as valid as another if you look at it in terms of alternate timelines.
Re: Do you still enjoy non-canon Dragon Ball content?
Wouldn't it be about 3.5 years by now?Grimlock wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:54 amOnly one so far, and it can easily be solved (but not for long if they keep cramming stories in this period of time). Bulma says her and her family haven't seen Goku for five years. That establishes they shouldn't have been seeing each other since Future Trunks saga, as is the last saga of AGE 779. But considering we're just one year ahead of that, we can assume Bulma rounded it up, and they actually haven't seen each other for about four years and X months.
May of Age 779: Pan is born and Freeza is resurrected sometime after this. We'll keep it at this month since it's not clear.
September of 779: Freeza trains for four months and returns to Earth.
After September of 779: Champa and Goku Black were also said to take place in 779.
After September of 780: Super Dragonballs need a year to recharge so the earliest the ToP could take place is exactly one year after the Champa arc.
Also after September of 780: DBS: Broly and Moro arc up until he finds the Earth.
November-December of 780: Moro gives the Z fighters two months to prepare for his return.
Was there anything I missed? I know it's not too important but just something I was curious about.