JewyB wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 2:09 pmI'm sorry i'm not following this point, you're saying that Beerus's reaction to powers aren't a reliable indicator? Wouldnt that mean any comments Shin or Goku made just as unreliable, moreso since i would consider Beerus to more accurately assess his own maximum power potential than two people who haven't witnessed him go all out except in the situation i described, where he was fighting people on his level, which makes it harder to judge.
I'm saying that if we were to apply your datum as particularly meaningful on its own, we'd end up inferring that Omen is more powerful than True Ultra Instinct, because Beerus's 'reaction' to Omen is much stronger than his 'reaction' to True Ultra Instinct at any point. Which would be absurd. Hence why I'm saying that reactions on their own don't necessarily count for much, however you may choose to explain them. The fact that you feel the need to explain why you think he reacts that way for one and not the other points up its evidential weakness.
JewyB wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 2:09 pmHow the series used to handle things =/= How it handles them now
What makes you say that? I'm pretty sure that even now, statements and demonstrated power disparities are still the principal and clearest way the series tends to point up power relationships. We see that SSjB Vegetto is much stronger than merged Zamas because we see the beatdown; we figure he may well be stronger than Beerus because Shin indicates that he thinks it may be so. That seems perfectly in keeping with most of Dragon Ball, to be honest. And it's rather less ambiguous than pursuing a reaction as though it means much.
JewyB wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 2:09 pmYou are basically saying "there may be evidence, and but i dont like it so i'd rather go with the lack of evidence on the other side" seemingly.
No, I'm saying "The quality of this piece of evidence is pretty poor because of its inherent ambiguity, so people shouldn't hang their hat on it and I'm not sure why they do". I'm certainly open to the idea that the statements made by Shin and Goku
may come wrong at some point in the future if they are
demonstrated to be, and I'm perfectly willing to believe that Beerus
may be more powerful than True Ultra Instinct Goku and Moro, but to do so on the basis of Beerus's reaction to something is really pretty weak.
I'd recommend using other arguments, is all I've ever been saying. Me saying "this argument is poor and can't bear the evidential load you're putting on it" is not tantamount to me saying "I wish to oppose your conclusions". And frankly, I don't mean to be rude, but in the final analysis, finding excuses to dismiss those statements from consideration in favour of an ambiguous reaction, and then saying I'm 'ignoring evidence' because I don't think it amounts to much ("don't like it"), is a little bit rich.