VegettoEX wrote: Tue Aug 02, 2022 3:30 pm
We don't have any insight into what their actual "limitations" are, but they seem to be fairly broad and open.
They've pulled Hacchihyack (an internal Bandai character), Ozotto (from a Sega-developed game), and Yamhan (from a Dimps-developed game) from the historical archives, so that certainly says to me they tend to have free rein in terms of prior-content-usage, even with content technically developed by other companies.
Then we have an example like Gohanks, where two versions of the character were simultaneously developed in a very specific dual-promotion campaign for
Heroes and
Fusions, where each game got to use both.
And then there are also things like Vegeks vs. Vegenks, where
Heroes made its own separate version...
But then what about the other
Fusions fusions? You mention a Freeza and Coola fusion... which exists in
Fusions. Same goes for a Tullece and Raditz fusion: one exists in
Fusions. I believe some of these have made appearances in OTHER games (the Freeza+Coola one is in
Dokkan, right?), so that says to me they're all up for grabs in SOME capacity at SOME point in time.
Part of me wonders if it's just a matter of pacing themselves. Sure,
Heroes has been going for over a decade now (and there's also a history before it, with Super Saiyan 3 Vegeta and Broli coming through the
Bakuretsu Impact games), but I can see them still wanting to hold onto some of these characters and ideas to keep an ever-dripping-drip of exciting content to use. Like, they could do an entire expansion with wacky fusions, but then they'd be done with them! That said, I think there's MORE than enough space for them to experiment and use some of these more often...
And what about original transformations? We get these "Limit Breaker" things, but those tend to be embellishments on existing transformations, rather than entirely new ones, right? So we get things like sparkles on top of transformations we already know, or Super Saiyan 4 dished out to characters that never got them originally (Broli, Gohan...).
So when you start to list out all the possible examples that HAVE happened and HAVEN'T happened, there's not a whole lot of consistency or reasoning to it. I don't think it would be possible for us to come up with some rule set that's absolutely being followed. What's far more likely, in my opinion, is that they're just taking it as it comes, introducing new things as they see fit and as it works into the rest of their content development schedule.
I bet there ARE certain things held holy, though; I would place money on only Toriyama ever being allowed to give Pan a Super Saiyan transformation, for example.