LightBing wrote: Tue Jan 28, 2025 12:29 pm
He didn't need to use it since he deposed his father without it.
We don't know how strong someone gets or even if everyone can wield it. Removing far from likely the only person that could utilize it against him seems like a sensible decision.
True, it's possible that it's only usable by certain people under specific circumstances. I guess we'll see to what extent that is the case when it does get used by someone in the coming episodes.
LoganForkHands73 wrote: Tue Jan 28, 2025 4:48 amBesides, I swear you or someone else made a point that Super Saiyan 3 is never supposed to be portrayed as physically taxing in Toriyama’s works after the Buu arc?
You might be mixing this up with me complaining that 3
isn't really portrayed as especially physically taxing after the Boo arc. People just bust it out in GT, Super, and Daima as if it wasn't so inefficient that Goku killed Boo with a Genki Dama instead.
Mr Baggins wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:10 pm
Uhh, how much more specific did they need to get? That's a pretty clear-cut statement, and it's obvious to me (particularly from the show's first half) that Toriyama was indeed
majorly involved with the story direction and script – right down to granular details such as the character interactions and comedic timing.
We're never gonna have super detailed nitty gritty insight as to how specific story decisions were made. I'd argue we still don't have enough of it for the original manga, let alone Toriyama's modern work.
I'm aware we'll never get all that nitty gritty insight, but my point is that we would
need such nitty gritty insight to conclude that Toriyama wanted them to do this exact flashback at this exact moment in this exact way.
Because while Toriyama provided ideas and designs, he is not the one
executing those. Other people are. It is absolutely not clear how much of a hand he had in how any specific thing was executed. As a result, I can't personally agree with the conclusion that this flashback was executed to Toriyama's specific wishes; it could have been, and that's be really neat, but that's not an inference that seems sensible to me. If it seems sensible to others (in this case
Logan), that is fine! I'm just trying to explain why we can't act like Daima is just all Toriyama, especially some of the nitty gritty stuff that to
me seems really obviously like something he'd be leaving up to the TV staff.
In reality, we're
not acting like Daima is all Toriyama, because whenever Daima does something we don't like it's all too easy to point at the Toei boogeyman.
Now suddenly Toriyama's not handling all of the granular details that seem more like they'd be up to the people actually making the TV show. Not that this is universally the case; for some, when Daima's bad it's because they're doing what Toriyama wanted, and when it's good it's because the creatives at Toei are finally getting to spread their wings. I just think it's a bit more complicated than that, and that the line separating the "good" in Daima from the "bad" isn't the same line that separates Toriyama's contributions from those of Toei and Kakihara.