Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Daima" TV series premiering October 2024, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4661
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by SupremeKai25 » Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:48 pm

Vegeta th3 4th wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:41 pm
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:34 pmThe Future Trunks saga and the major fights of the ToP were genuinely entertaining and spectacular.
No they weren't. Both arcs had some of the worst writing this franchise has ever produced.
I don't care only about writing so I can overlook "bad writing" if the antagonists are enjoyable to watch and the fights are entertaining.

Not everyone considers writing to be a deal-breaker. That's why I also enjoy the final kamehameha between Gohan and Cell despite the utterly atrocious writing throughout the arc that led to that moment.
At his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with Toyotaro

User avatar
ZombieVito
Banned
Posts: 6222
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by ZombieVito » Sun Mar 09, 2025 4:28 pm

SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:34 pm I'm just wondering if there's anyone else who agrees with me that quality > quantity, so DBS is the best "sequel" simply because of the Future Trunks saga and those stellar fights in the ToP. I am willing to overlook the quantity of ugly and boring episodes for the high quality of a few peak episodes. 🤷‍♂️
You have my Ki sword.

Zamasu/ToP arcs and both DBS movie are peak DB for me.

Daima completely bored me until episode 17 but even then, it never reached the peak levels I felt with DBS. Not even close.

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4661
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by SupremeKai25 » Sun Mar 09, 2025 5:43 pm

ZombieVito wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 4:28 pm
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:34 pm I'm just wondering if there's anyone else who agrees with me that quality > quantity, so DBS is the best "sequel" simply because of the Future Trunks saga and those stellar fights in the ToP. I am willing to overlook the quantity of ugly and boring episodes for the high quality of a few peak episodes. 🤷‍♂️
You have my Ki sword.

Zamasu/ToP arcs and both DBS movie are peak DB for me.

Daima completely bored me until episode 17 but even then, it never reached the peak levels I felt with DBS. Not even close.
These talks of "quality > quantity" to criticise Super are funny, because the Future Trunks saga is practically the epitome of "quality > quantity".

Firstly, there's only two villains. That's a new low for Dragon Ball, where the arcs usually have a large ensemble of villains, both major and minor villains. The Future Trunks saga only has two: Black and Zamasu. But these two have charisma, a colourful skill-set with techniques that have beautiful aesthetics (seriously, just look at any of Fused Zamasu's techniques, there's no character with a more spectacular skill-set than him), an interesting dynamic as two variations of the same person, and a unique origin and motivations that tie into the world-building of Z and Super about the Kaioshin.

(and I would suggest everyone to read the interview Toriyama had about his creation, Zamasu, that I reported in my signature; I find Toriyama's words about his Zamasu illuminating when it comes to understanding this villain, who is so different from Toriyama's other villains)

The hero cast is also quite small when compared to previous arcs. There's five main heroes: Goku, Vegeta, Trunks, Bulma, and Mai. However, each and every one of these characters is given their time to shine and play a meaningful role for the story, and I am honestly surprised at how perfectly Bulma and Future Mai were integrated into the main storyline. Bulma rebuilding Cell's time machine with the notes her future counterpart left her and Mai rallying the resistance of the destroyed Earth were such good writing.

The Future Trunks saga is actually quite short. It's got 21 episodes, so it's Daima's length. However, I find this saga to have epic moments more consistently than Daima.

Ep. 47-48, the introduction episodes to Goku Black, are masterfully written and directed, with 47 building up the mystery of Black by shrouding him beneath a veil of darkness and only unveiling him at the end, and also setting the stage for this dark arc with Black killing Future Bulma.

Ep. 53-55, the episodes centred around Zamasu's fall from grace, have some of the best dialogue and writing in modern Dragon Ball and tie perfectly into the lore of the gods. We know that the Kaioshin are gods of creation, who must nurture and cherish life and not take action. But what if a Kaioshin doesn't want to remain passive and abhors this inaction that is forced on him? The introspection on Zamasu's character is brilliantly showcased by the metaphor of the tea quality reflecting the purity of the heart, and the debates between Zamasu and Gowasu on the role of gods and the worth of mortals. Finally, when Zamasu makes up his mind on eradicating all mortals, he is surrounded by falling roses, a visual element that flows perfectly into the next episodes...

Ep. 56-57: Super Saiyan Rosé and the first big fight with Black and Zamasu. It's one of the best-looking and directed fights in modern Dragon Ball, with a unique dynamic as it's a 2v2 (usually Dragon Ball fights are 1v1).

Ep. 59-66 is the best run of episodes in modern Dragon Ball. October-November 2016 was a crazy time period for Dragon Ball. Every episode gradually raised the stakes culminating in the most explosive ending to any Dragon Ball arc:

Beerus erasing Zamasu, Black revealing his true identity and plans, Black and Zamasu utterly humiliating and destroying the opposition (this was truly one of the darkest times for the protagonists), Super Saiyan Rage, Vegeta's speech to Black, Fused Zamasu, Vegito vs. Fused Zamasu, that beautifully directed sequence of Trunks destroying Zamasu... wow... there was just so much. During this month and a half, I found myself craving for every new episode. I was so gripped by the storyline.

In conclusion: I rate Super above Daima and GT simply because of the Future Trunks saga. I will value individual arcs very highly.

Quality > quantity. :)
At his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with Toyotaro

User avatar
ZombieVito
Banned
Posts: 6222
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by ZombieVito » Sun Mar 09, 2025 7:48 pm

You forgot the music. DBS has incredible music like Goku Black's or Ultra Instinct's themes.

I honestly can't even remember any for Daima except for the opening. Which to be fair is very good.

The ToP arc is also great. Without a doubt my favorite tournament in the franchise. Not perfect of course but it managed to use the extended cast very well and gave characters their much needed due like Roshi and 18. Much better than Daima which didn't give anything of worth to anyone not named Goku and Vegeta.

User avatar
Vegeta th3 4th
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:17 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Vegeta th3 4th » Sun Mar 09, 2025 8:01 pm

ZombieVito wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 7:48 pmThe ToP arc is Without a doubt my favorite tournament in the franchise.
Neither the writing nor the fight choreography is better than any tournament in the original DB.

User avatar
ZombieVito
Banned
Posts: 6222
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by ZombieVito » Sun Mar 09, 2025 9:06 pm

Vegeta th3 4th wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 8:01 pm Neither the writing nor the fight choreography is better than any tournament in the original DB.
I don't care or agree.

User avatar
Vegeta th3 4th
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:17 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Vegeta th3 4th » Sun Mar 09, 2025 9:19 pm

ZombieVito wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 9:06 pmI don't care or agree.
Makes sense; it'd be hard to like Super if you cared about quality.

User avatar
ZombieVito
Banned
Posts: 6222
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by ZombieVito » Sun Mar 09, 2025 11:09 pm

Vegeta th3 4th wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 9:19 pm Makes sense; it'd be hard to like Super if you cared about quality.
Image

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6388
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Cipher » Mon Mar 10, 2025 12:37 am

Inclusive of the manga and movies? Super, via them.

TV shows only? GT is the only one I'm ever likely to want to rewatch in full.

User avatar
GokuHater
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 8:46 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by GokuHater » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:59 am

People always say GT has good ideas, bad execution.

Well, for me both GT and Super have excellent ideas, bad execution and a ton of wasted potential.
I mean nearly every saga starts out strong but doesn't go anywhere where I think it could have with a good storytelling.

Introducing Beerus as a sort of antagonist/Goku's rival is a genius idea but it goes nowhere, Beerus becomes a bit of comic relief who always is leagues above Goku.
Introducing 12 universes is a fantastic idea but nothing is done with them. The only time we actually see most of them is ToP and then it really doesn't have the weight of a whole multiverse, just a bunch of guys who really just could be from another planet.

Zamasu is a great concept for a villain but after his initial introduction, he just slays and kills ppl for lulz and doesn't carry any deep.

Universe 6 tournament is a good idea which could have great fights, interesting characters, techniques and goes back to Budokai Tenkaichi. But somehow it doesn't hold a candle to all Tenkaichi Budokai's.

Tournament of Power has a great premise. All of the universes fight a desperate battle literally forced by the gods for their pleasure. It could have gone in such ways... The mortals have enough and fight the gods, Freeza challenges them and becomes the real threat, Jiren has an actual good backstory, even framing Goku as the villain by everyone.
But it's played as a normal tournament and even though fights are good, animation is lovely, various tranformations are okay, it still feels very safe and formulaic.

Now don't get me wrong. GT has the exact same issues.
Baby - EXCELLENT idea, goes nowehere besides a big bad brute
Shadow Dragons - superb premise but ends in a random monster of the week formula

If I really had to choose, I would pick GT but only by a small margin. Characters are more in character I would say and it is more of a concrete sequel with time passage and a definite ending.

As for Saima I didn't still fully watch it so I won't be judging it yet :D

User avatar
Koitsukai
I Live Here
Posts: 4762
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:02 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Koitsukai » Mon Mar 10, 2025 2:51 pm

I think the three of them touch different notes for me.

DBS is where they get to fight the most exagerated villains, with the craziest scenarios and stakes, deletion of worlds, universes and timelines. New forms, angels, gods, rivals that defy the space-time continuum. Amazing fights, power ups and resolutions. Freeza teaming up with Goku? god damn.
I'd say this one is the one that breaks the mold and does things that the others did not dare to do. Like having Goku lose and not defeat the antagonist (Beerus). There's an arc where he fails and they lose everything. There's another arc where he loses again and the day is saved by Freeza.

GT is more of a bittersweet journey. It's our friends but older, except for Goku. Say what you want about their characterizations but I really liked to see how they were doing after all that time. It's also nice to see a story take place after the manga ended. That sets GT apart from the others: it's an actual sequel. And it dares to end it, for good and with a bang.
The fights... yeah, hard pass. Boring as fuck, ki blast being spammed arc after arc. Boring resolutions, too. And too much emphasis of having Goku do everything. I guess, SS3 was considered a huge step up that nobody but Goku could take... that's another thing that seems to have been done to show Goku is a cut above the rest. Barely GT's fault, though, they picked up were Z left off.
So, the fights were awful, 4 arcs with one being dreadful, one of them being considered by most as boring, and only 2/4 being worthy of anything.
I still like that they went ahead a explored the universe and went to places that probably Freeza was never even heard of. Dr Myuu was doing things and taking over solar systems while Freeza was doing the same on the other side of the universe.
It gives a sense of vastness that Z (with it's 4 quadrants) and DBS (with its 28 planets with life) did not. The GT universe is vast, look at all of the things that were happening and we were all unaware.

Daima has a little bit of both.
It's a midquel like DBS, it's safe in that regard. It's all happening within the same timeframe, takes no chances in terms of when this is happening. It's a reboot-ish of GT, that much is obvious. I think the adventure was fun, the humor is the best out of the three sequels. The fighting was fun, not as great as in DBS but way better than GT.
There was less Goku wanking, but barely, it was shared with Vegeta. The rest of the cast was as useless as in GT, except for Kuu Daimao.
Forms were given away here and there without real purpose or good cause, just for spectacle. And I guess it worked, even though SS3 and SS4 had 0 emotional resonance with me.
There was, sadly, never any serious tone, it never moved away from being a silly little story. I never felt like things could really be fucked, not like I did when Baby stole the DBs or when Vegeta was instructing everybody to leave Earth and avenge Goku.}
The animation was the best, the soundtrack it's probably the weakest, while having an amazing opening.

I think, it depends on my mood, since I love the fighting part of the franchise, I'm usually siding with DBS. If I want to have a more light-hearted adventure and laugh and see the best characterization of Goku, Daima is my man.
But if I want to break free from the boring rift of Buu-EoZ, and move away from gods, fanservice and majins, I'd go to GT, is the most flawed of them all, but it does the one thing the other don't: it moves forward.

User avatar
DHM211
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:48 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by DHM211 » Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:05 pm

The Dragon Ball Super manga, combined with Battle of Gods, Resurrection 'F' and Broly is definitely, to me the most consistently enjoyable and logical sequel. There are still some odd decisions and awkward characterizations, but by and far feels the most in-line with Dragon Ball/Z, Solid 8.5/10

The DBS anime has some great highs (episodes 47,48,56,57,66,95,110,130, & 131 come to mind as some of my favorite across any DB series), but there is far too many negatives. Horrible animation, horrible characterization, filler/pacing issues, etc. For the most part, this really doesn't feel like DB to me until we get to the Tournament of Power, which, while not great, at least felt somewhat in line with late DBZ. As a side note, the anime version of Goku Black is by far my favorite character in any of the series. 6/10

Dragon Ball GT ... just not a fan. I liked the design and idea behind Baby/Baby Vegeta, and Super Saiyan 4 is cool, but thats about it. Not a fan of the tone and art style, or story overall. 2/10

Dragon Ball Daima - Inoffensive at worst. I enjoyed the art/animation. It was definitely a redux of GT, but it was more enjoyable. I'm still not a fan of the whole turning into a kid thing, but I enjoyed far more as the whole cast, rather than just Goku. This show does not feel like a sequel, more like a (stretched out) one-off, like "Yo! Son Goku and his friends return". 6.5/10

User avatar
Vegeta th3 4th
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:17 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Vegeta th3 4th » Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:28 pm

DHM211 wrote: Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:05 pmDragon Ball Daima does not feel like a sequel, more like a (stretched out) one-off, like "Yo! Son Goku and his friends return".
I think that's actually a strength, rather than a weakness. Dragon Ball was a completed story, it didn't need full-blown sequels like GT and Super. One off stories like Daima, Battle of Gods, and the 2008 OVA felt more appropriate in my opinion. A new standalone story with high production value every few years is more than enough to keep me happy.

Super-Shenron
Newbie
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2025 6:52 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Super-Shenron » Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:31 am

GT's the only actual sequel. It wins by default :D

Now if I stop being cheeky and reframe the question as "better series", I'll have to say Super (anime and manga) > Daima > GT.

User avatar
SSGpotota
Newbie
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 12:54 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by SSGpotota » Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:47 am

I prefer Super just because is more Dragon Ball, with new arcs, transformations, characters, more stuff. The highs are very high and I can stand the lows.
Daima is the best looking one and with the best humor, but it needed a few more episodes to fully flesh out some ideas and characters.
GT has very interesting ideas executed badly, looks like shit, and I can't stand the lows. But at least it introduced the best Super Saiyan (and the best version of it).

User avatar
anubisj
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 10:22 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by anubisj » Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:08 pm

God, this was a long time coming.

Ok, firstly, I'll be honest; I prefer the DBZ kind of Dragon Ball, with powerful fights, earth-threatening, amazing villains, and some humor interspersed, but when it's time to get serious, it gets really serious, with blood, deaths in the main cast (even though we know they'll be back by next saga) and surpassing really strong opponents...

I prefer that to OG DB style stories, which I understand, have their place in the fandom, but I just don't dig Toriyama's humor that much, and I don't watch Dragon Ball to get a good laugh, but mostly to be amazed...I also don't mind much stuff like animation (more interested in choreography than animation), as in, I loved the dbz-era fights where characters where just points crashing on each other, and you just had to imagine both of them fighting; i love well-animated battles, but I can also enjoy a lot a battle that is not like really-well executed or animated (in fact the bad animation at the beginning of Super didn't do much to change my opinion of it). Having said that:

GT:

Actual sequel with grown up characters, new designs for the z warriors, plenty of years passed, bold new ideas, amazing execution in many places, awesome ost...The series starts a bit low after the first couple episodes, with alien fodder here and there (still better designed in many cases than Super and Daima's fodder) and the premise of going back to Dragon Ball's roots but this time exploring the galaxy...As I said, the childish version of DB is not my cup of tea, and besides, this arc was certainly worse executed than OGDB, but soon enough, Baby appears, a sole parasite that, just by himself, fucks the entire earth and most z warriors, using his brains no less (Base Baby couldn't even beat Goten, prob). Shit hits the fan, the show gets serious and actually quite dark, we get to see former friends and family suddenly become slaves to a vengeful alien, and actually become threats to Goku..I mean, the scene of Videl kicking Pan was brutal.
I also loved how progessively Baby takes a hold of Earth defenders, and the design of Vegeta Baby's final form is just amazing. Also, Oozarus were back into the picture (something that Super removed in favor of SSj), Trunks and Pan got the spotlight (I particularly enjoyed how mature Trunks was in comparison to his young self), Goku had a tail again, people die and it matters (krillin, piccolo) and Ssj 4 was one of the best things that had happened to the franchise, period.

It had its lows, too, sure, like Uub not doing much (though I loved his design), Pan not getting ssj in the entirety of the series, and, sure, the battles themselves where not like the best ever. But I did like villains like Rilldo, Mutchy or Ledgic, and the whole saga was pretty bold in its ideas and concepts. I remember getting chills the first time I saw Baby manifest on Earth. I don't know, that whole part was just really well-done. And then Gohan noticing that something's wrong with his brother, but not sure what...anyways, I'll say that the Baby saga was clearly the high for GT, but I also like Super 17 (unlike many people here), I think it's a short, nice saga, that further explored the really cool concept of past villains wreaking havoc on the world (I didn't feel they did it justice with the Janemba movie) and some things that didn't make sense, but hey, at least they had the balls to kill off a character in cold blood, they closed the story of 17 and 18 (never made sense to me that 17 became a z warrior in Super), and at least Super 17 had a new design (if it was Super, it would be 17 but with green hair, prob).

The Shadow Dragon Saga was nice, though I didn't enjoy some of the antics of the dragons (some looked odd tbh); it had some issues, but the premise of the Dragon Balls being the enemy is just too good and original, and even though some of the dragons were a bit disappointing, they still pulled off an amazing ending and swan song for the anime trilogy, which punches me in the gut like a dragon fist everytime I see it, and I also don't forget stuff like the awesome designs (Gogeta and Vegeta ssj4, goddammit, omega shenron...) and the fact that there was actual blood, which, for me, makes the battle way more appealing than good animation. Among the things I would change, I would make Uub do more things, but, thinking about it, Uub is a complex character to fit in the story, since this anime trilogy (and modern DB too, so far) is actually Goku's story, and Uub indirectly removes the focus on the characters the audience has grown to love...I guess that can be fixed by making Uub more relatable, showing us more of his background...but, in any case, the point here is, the lows of GT are not enough for me to dislike the series in general. Will defintely rewatch it in the future DB marathon. 9/10


Super:

Toriyama approved, Anubisj hated, fans generally accepted, I believe this show had potential, but the execution was a mess. Basically, they went the way of most franchises when they have been around for a long time; mass-appealing, lack of originality in favour of the same shit that you know will sell, more and more kid friendly, fear of changing the status-quo, and Toriyama's name everywhere, without allowing others to give their input (broadly speaking ofc, I know there were many writers, too, but it seems like if Toriyama said something, it was like God's Word).

There's just a lot of things wrong with this show and manga, from the horrible/mediocre designs for plenty of characters, to the recolored ssjs, to the fan service stuff that just doesnt make sense (why is Yamcha not fighting at all while Roshi is on par with some of the most powerful beings of a universe??); it had its highs, too, like Jiren (though the design was a bit plain), Zamasu's concept, Ultra Instinct, the gods of destruction and angels, etc. But then you see stuff like the Teletubbies (Ribrianne and company), Gohan Beast being a longer, white ssj2 (I'm sorry, it just looks ridiculous), orange piccolo (cant say it with a straight face), recycling of characters (cell recolored, frieza recolored, again Broly with new design but yeah, its broly but "cAnOn")...jeez, for all the people complaining about the granolah saga, I actually enjoyed it and think the cerealians, Granolah, the Heeters with their war to gather more info and use their smart asses, it's all original (forgetting about Bardock ofc), and the designs are not lacklustre (except, well, black frieza looks passable, but, I mean, it's just another recolor xD). Anyways, all things considered, the series was chaos, but there's some shining in the mud.

It also doesn't help that it's not a sequel but a midquel, with the same boring dynamics between Vegeta and Goku, and Gohan studying, and goten and trunks antics, and blablabla. And what was Mai doing there proposing to Future Trunks??God, they only put her there because of her design, jeez. Mai was always a simpleton, why would they make her some Sarah Connor all of a sudden? I just can't watch the EOZ epilogue and imagine Super happening before it. 6/10


Daima:

Ah, yes. The Toriyama-super approved. It seems the more modern Toriyama contributed to the franchise, the more it became a dumpster. It's funny, because I remember seeing how people where like "oh but you have to watch it with the heart, not analyze it so much"; welp, I don't have much problem with the pacing, I think it has an average ending, and animation is top-notch. If I view it with my heart, though, it would just break, and I can't have that so soon. So, question, who was this series for? Another question, would you watch it with Super-level quality of animation?

Like, for Kami's sake, it's like someone made this series on purpose so that Super would look better in comparison. It basically took almost everything that I disliked about Super, added some of good ol´"Toiryama's humor", mixed it up in a cocktail with super-mega-hyper-ultra good animation, and voila.

More childish, (now not only Goku, everyone is a kid, yaaay"), horrible, and I mean really horrible designs (nothing that tops the teletubbies, but, I don't know, whenever I see the Tamagamis, I can't avoid thinking of them as toys, like they look really out of place next to, say, Kaioshin or Piccolo; Where are the days of new characters like Raditz, Cell, Ginyu force, Dabura...appearing?).

In fact, Dabura just doesn't fit either in this so-called demon realm, everyone looks like bunnies, you almost wanna hug the villains. We didn't get to see much of the demon culture (and why are they called demons? Only demonic being was Dabura tbh); plenty of things that didn't go anywhere (the machine of borrowing life years, an avalanche of lore drops that were completely unnecessary and just disrupted the established one, sort of like midichlorians for star wars...), them being kids didn't amount to much, just like Vegeta or Piccolo coming again...I mean, sure, Vegeta got ssj3, and they did something original by making it a different design...but, tbh, I actually prefer the xeno vegeta ssj3. Like, how is Vegeta Daima holding his head straight, the hair should weight too much!

The battles themselves were nice and exciting, but I never cared less about who won and who didn't, like, I couldn't care less about the Gomah guy and his looney toons personality, and his new form with the third eye is just him but bigger and more muscular, which actually, and hilariously enough, makes him look like Jiren (as if the recycling and creative wasteland of the design department wasn't barren enough). Ssj 4 Daima is just the putrid icing on the expired, melted cake, with the same, exact design but this time red, and with big, monkey arms and no waistband, which somehow makes it less appealing in general (especially since it wasn't at all earned, and it appeared first as a kid and then another time as an adult, like two climaxes).

The final battle was nice, but it was so kid-friendly, that sometimes I couldn't help but laugh when i saw the monkey Goku just punch repeatedly the rubber-like big guy, and the big guy repeatedly getting healed, to a point that became silly. Bulma again wanting to be beautiful and sexy, Glorio being boring, Piccolo being useless (the hit on the back could've been done by Vegeta or Glorio or whomever), Majin's design being lacklustre (I just dont feel hype to play them in a game or something, really, especially Kuu), 10 min of Buu saga exposition in the first episode, Porunga the same but red, Degesu being less than a joke... best design hands down was the Minotaur, and even that was a "homage " (they so enjoy homaging the past huh) of the Oolong story. I didn't even want to watch the series anymore, but forced myself like suffering through an ilness, hoping it would get good in the end...and it got better, in the last couple eps, but not by much, certainly not enough to deserve a rewatch for me (yes, even tho it's 20 eps).

Bunch of retcons of retcons (don't get me wrong, I love the potaras being permanent, Super screwed it there, but...why saibamen need to be Majin??), and when it seemed like they would add another kind of fusion, they stepped back, adding insult to injury (only Heroes had the balls to add new fusion designs, aside from that, since GT we only had Gogeta Super, the same but with yellow vest, and Vegito Super, exactly the same), so, I'll ask again, who was this show for? Well, guys, clearly not for me it seems. :lol:

Tbh, I think they tried to appeal to the OGDB kid audience (OG DB being wayyyyyyyyyy better than this thing), and, in the last couple episodes, decided to add some explosions so the general DB audience wouldn't feel betrayed. But, I mean, if I were a new youngster in search of good anime, I would most definitely not enjoy Daima and it would probably not make me check out the rest of the franchise. And, being a veteran and long-time fan, I'm appalled by this series and deeply hurt, refusing to believe it belongs to my beloved franchise (plus it was Toriyama's last project,; btw, if this didn't have Toriyama's name on it, I'm sure it would get even more thrashed). To sum it up, there's just very few things that make me care about this show, that make me enjoy it, which is sad. This is not how I like my Dragon Ball. 2/10


I really hope that they will improve the quality of the new series going forward, but my expectations are each time lower (like, why would they try harder, if they are already selling well as is?). I'm sure there's a lot of able artists out there, just waiting to be hired, that could make a really enjoyable and spectacular continuation for the franchise that we all love, so I won't lose hope.

User avatar
Vegeta th3 4th
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:17 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Vegeta th3 4th » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:14 pm

anubisj wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:08 pm GT:
Actual sequel with grown up characters, new designs for the z warriors, plenty of years passed, bold new ideas, amazing execution in many places, awesome ost... Baby appears, a sole parasite that, just by himself, fucks the entire earth and most z warriors, using his brains no less. I also like Super 17 (unlike many people here), I think it's a short, nice saga, that closed the story of 17 and 18 and at least Super 17 had a new design. The premise of the Dragon Balls being the enemy is just too good and original, and even though some of the dragons were a bit disappointing, they still pulled off an amazing ending and swan song for the anime trilogy.
I will always give GT credit and appreciate it for keeping the theme of "moving forward, not looking back" that Dragon Ball is known for alive and well. Unlike Super that's too afraid to even change the characters' outfits, GT does everything you'd expect the next chapter of a story to do: move on. Despite the many issues I have with it, GT still gets enough right for me to revisit it every now and then. I'd even recommend it to someone who's just getting into the franchise if they're still hungry for DB content after watching DB & Z.
anubisj wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 5:08 pm Super:
Toriyama approved, Anubisj hated, fans generally accepted, I believe this show had potential, but the execution was a mess. Basically, they went the way of most franchises when they have been around for a long time; mass-appealing, lack of originality in favour of the same shit that you know will sell, more and more kid friendly, fear of changing the status-quo, and Toriyama's name everywhere, without allowing others to give their input.


Super is honestly everything you don't want in a series, much less a sequel to a beloved one. Everything that could've gone wrong, went horribly wrong. The writing was atrocious, and more often than not the art and animation were flat out insulting to the eyes. Outside the Battle of Gods movie, there's nothing I can recommend here that isn't done far better in the original trilogy.

User avatar
YamiGoku
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:41 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by YamiGoku » Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:30 pm

Daima may have good animation/production, but in the end it will never be as good as Super.

User avatar
Vegeta th3 4th
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:17 am

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by Vegeta th3 4th » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:13 am

YamiGoku wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:30 pmDaima may have good animation/production, but in the end it will never be as good as Super.
This is factually incorrect. If something (Daima) has good production and consistent writing, then it's better than something (Super) that has neither.

User avatar
YamiGoku
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:41 pm

Re: Which was the better sequel: GT, Super, or Daima ?

Post by YamiGoku » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:01 pm

Vegeta th3 4th wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:13 am
YamiGoku wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:30 pmDaima may have good animation/production, but in the end it will never be as good as Super.
This is factually incorrect. If something (Daima) has good production and consistent writing, then it's better than something (Super) that has neither.
Super was way more entertaining than Daima, and some of you guys speak of Daima like it was perfect when at least 70% of it feels like a boring waste of time, and the writing was not good at all, the Fusion Bugs not being used not even as a gag was bad, Goku literally showing he has IT in one episode and then not using It ever again when he would just fix the problem evry time, they act like the characters on their minni forms are actually nerf to the point Giants and lasser guns are a threat, when they showed us they have all their transformations and power when they fought the Tamagamis who just by using common sense we can tell they are Ss2-Ss3 level, Arinsu chaged her mind in an instant because Daima wasted a lot of time on stupid things instead of actually develop the new characters and having time for their actions to feel natural and not like someone flips a switch.

Daima has a good production and animation but is just as flawed as Super on everything else, but Super was way more entertaining and even when it was bad it was fun to make fun of it, Daima was painfully boring for most of it and none cared about it until the episodes with the new transformations aired.

Post Reply