Is this referring to me? If so I'd like to clarify that I did not post that comment with the intention of antagonizing, I'm sorry if it came across that way. I simply stated my opinion that Pan was irrelevant in GT, in a way to imply that anything would have been better than what we've got, even a tacked on super saiyan transformation would be better than being irrelevant or a damsel in distress.VegettoEX wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:47 pm I agree -- largely in its tone than in its content.
Who are you folks appearing out of nowhere, guns blazing with antagonism from the very first post in a thread?
Clearly I disagreed with the user who created this thread and that first reply was meant to show that, but my intention was not at all to come in guns blazing. Maybe the lack of elaboration of my point made it seem more hostile than it was supposed to be (in my head it wasn't supposed to be hostile at all). Anyway, if you were referring to me then apologies, I'll make sure not to come across as antagonistic in the future and to express my tone more clearly, because the last thing I want is to spread negativity.



