It's true that things do inevitably change, and over time things age.JulieYBM wrote: Wed Apr 09, 2025 11:53 amThe point I ultimately wanted to make was that things change and what was once 'new' will ultimately become as relatively 'old' as anything before it. I don't think staunchly cutting off what counts as 'old Dragon Ball' at 1997 (or 1998-1999, where Gokuu was appearing in Dr. Slump's second animated series) is feasible. In ither words, it's inevitable that 'old Dragon Ball' will not always only refer to series and films from the 1980s and 1990s.
But it's also worth acknowledging that things don't always change at the same pace, or in the same way, consistently across gaps in time. I think of images like this that make it clear that things many of us might still think of as feeling 'recent' are actually super old.
My point being: not every 10 year gap is created equally. I think Vegard Aune's point about HD and widescreen kind of maps onto my point about video game graphics. Sometimes there's just a line, and two things on one side of it feel more akin to one another than either do to something chronologically-closer that's on the other side. It's not for nothing that while talking to a friend of mine about various DB sequels (he's watching Z for the first time, for context), he told me: "GT is the best one cause it's not HD and DB looks weird in HD". Now he's half-joking here, but that comment is rooted in things falling on different sides of a decidedly-noticeable line. He's not an entrenched anime viewer, either.