Grimlock wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 2:47 am
Yes, I've seen you bringing up "Doctor Who" before. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it a western franchise? I have heard of it, but never watched or anything. If it's a western franchise, no wonder it would go out of its way to have a canon, since that's a western concept. I'm yet to see an eastern product/media/franchise officially using canon, though.
Weird to say that because I don't think that makes any sense & isn't even remotely true, but ok.
Kamen Rider. Kamen Rider has multiple universes that the main series take place in, yet also has alternate versions of those worlds it taps into sometimes ever since Decade to avoid continuity problems if the writers don't wanna portray the original versions of the characters, or an actor isn't available to come back.
Yes, Doctor Who is Western franchise. Specifically British. However, certain fans make the argument that the show doesn't have a canon, even though it
does & until recently (as in the Chris Chibnall era), it respected & maintained a consistent canon. The only things that really changed were the depictions of the future as time marched on or writers had different ideas on how to portray future timeframes. Especially because early episodes in the first 2 Doctors' eras are lost (though the scripts were adapted into novels & they still have them, plus fans gave the BBC audio recordings of the episodes) because of the BBC's junking policy in the 70s & VHS tapes didn't exist until the late 70s. And it's only more recently that the canon started being massively fucked with with huge retcons & bad writing that didn't pan out trying to be "experimental" or some shit. This is the point, though. Doctor Who has a mass of external media while the DB manga also does, yet some fans have a weird compulsion to say this isn't the case that they're external media for a reason & try to fit it all in, which makes no sense to do, nor do the people who make the shit concern themselves with it. Toriyama never concerned himself with it even though he watched it & even praised the anime staff on occasion outside of referencing Bardock in the manga. Granted, the Z anime influenced how he wrote Goku in the Android Arc because he didn't want Goku to be seen as less selfish than he was & what not. Hell, with how much modern DB media springboards off the manga, it really hammers in the point I'm making.
Grimlock wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 2:47 am
Applying that modus operandi to Dragon Ball is nothing but a personal choice. It doesn't mean that the franchise works the same way. And even if we were to do that, then you will quickly see that what I've been exhaustively saying is true, because the original manga hasn't acknowledged anything outside of it, which would mean that nothing is canonical. The manga ended in 1995.
This also works for
my argument.
Because the manga hasn't acknowledged the animated works outside of it (minus the original Bardock special), that's also a reason to not view anything outside of it as the true canon.
Grimlock wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 2:47 am
And as per the very definition of canon: "a religious term used to refer to
which Biblical books were included in the official Bible" (pay very attention to what is underlined), it is like I said before, saying that the original manga is canonical doesn't offer anything of value, canon is not concerned with the original material, it is concerned with the other materials that "diverges off", like you say, of the original material.
I mean, canon has multiple meanings, including one related to bread. Only 2 relate to anything religious. The modern definition as used by most people is related to this one, "the authentic works of a writer." Toriyama only directly wrote the manga, the last 4 movies Super's storylines & other things in it, & Daima. Everything else has been Toei's staff or Toyotaro. Toriyama has also given external information in interviews that ended up in the guidebooks, the Daizenshuus, & the Full Color Manga releases, some of which has been incorporated into the new stuff he wrote. Only really strengthens my argument here, tbh, when Toei also defers to the manga & Toriyama.
Grimlock wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 2:47 am
I maintain what I said, you want to say that there's a canon and that the original manga is canonical? Okay, all I can say to that is that the water is wet, earth is solid, ice is slippery. I don't know where you want us to get with such statements, but if that's what makes you happy, so be it. May we please put this subject to bed?
It's almost 2026...

Technically, when you're in water, it's not wet. It's only when you get out of it that you
get wet.
I mean, I'm an argumentative fuck, so no, but I'm ok taking a break from this if you want to.