In order to continue DB's story in an authentic manner, Jump should create a Toriyama AI bot

[JulieYBM]

They should have broken up the action more with flashbacks during the Tournament of Power arc to give those characters more context for their own personal reasons to for fighting.

Idk I was also fine with most of the participants just being fodder.

Like Ribrianne was a perfectly fun character that got hate for reasons I’m sure have nothing to do with her size or the expression of her gender

I don’t think she needs depth or any reason to exist beyond “magical girl “ parody

I mean, I think there's material to mine there, especially in contrasting her with everyone she fought, but I wouldn't expect every contestant to get flashbacks, either.

[super michael]

Thanks to all this AI, it looks like memory rams is getting a lot of expensive. I think SSD is also getting more expensive.

[Metalwario64]

Thanks to all this AI, it looks like memory rams is getting a lot of expensive. I think SSD is also getting more expensive.

Yeah... If it ain't one thing it's another... Fuck man, so tired of trying to save up for PC upgrades only for this shit to constantly pull the rug out from under me.

[FortuneSSJ]

Toriyama AI bot would still forget and retcon stuff though.

[JulieYBM]

Toriyama AI bot would still forget and retcon stuff though.

It's a good thing that we don't even need to think that far, given that AI art is inherently not acceptable art and should never be used.

[FinalForumPodcast]

It doesn't "help", it just interferes with the process that the professionals are already perfectly good at and familiar with. It's nothing but a pointless addition to a process that's already been figured out, it's only use is allowing higher up bastards to refuse the option to pay other humans for their services.

Hear, hear.

AI tools have some uses, but they should be for data collation and analysis, not creative works and processes. AI tools should help with analyzing complex data sets and eliminating rote, repetitive data entry tasks, not replacing human thought and leaving people as nothing more than "quality control."

If it's art, AI should be nowhere near it.

[Hellspawn28]

Art by other animals is still art because they are living beings.

But they are not people. Animals don't make art. People, unlike animals, have intellect and reason and art is about creating, expressing and conveying something from oneself to another.

The first form of art was created by Homo Erectus which is not human. Unlike AI, Homo Erectus and other non human animals are living begins with their own thoughts. AI can't think on its own.

[Luso Saiyan]

The first form of art was created by Homo Erectus which is not human.

That's conjecture.

Unlike AI, Homo Erectus and other non human animals are living begins with their own thoughts. AI can't think on its own.

Humans are distinct from animals and all other living beings in that they have conscience, intellect and reason, from which art emanates.

AI can't think on its own.

That's right, AI can't think. It only processes data.

[PhantomSaiyan]

The first form of art was created by Homo Erectus which is not human.

That's conjecture.

Regardless of that, Homo Erectus was still human (it's called Homo for a reason, latin root, homo literally meaning human) so what's the point of even bringing it up