Mr Baggins wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 10:57 amSomebody in another thread said something to the effect of "move over Daima, here's the real hype" and I'm still lol'ing
Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 DBS remaster, DBS galactic patrol arc, Age 1000 announced.
-
The Dark Knight
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
This was presumably the plan, but all these announcements and no new story. Super's getting rehashed, we're getting Moro, but we already know what happens there too because of the manga.
I wonder if there's some stipulation somewhere that says they can't add anymore new stories (anime or manga)? Or maybe they don't think any new stories would sell without Toriyama.
I wonder if there's some stipulation somewhere that says they can't add anymore new stories (anime or manga)? Or maybe they don't think any new stories would sell without Toriyama.
On hiatus.
-
The Dark Knight
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Both the manga and anime were on hiatus because of the legal dispute behind the scenes. Now that it's been resolved, I expect the manga's return to be announced sometime this year, likely during Jumo Festa in December.Chuquita wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 11:06 amI wonder if there's some stipulation somewhere that says they can't add anymore new stories (anime or manga)? Or maybe they don't think any new stories would still without Toriyama.
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Sweet, looking forward to both and I can’t complain
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
That would mean 2026 is a whole new year without the manga too, and also DB doesn't reveal much at Jump Festa as we've seen last year. I'm hoping it manages to make a return this year somehow.The Dark Knight wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 11:07 am Both the manga and anime were on hiatus because of the legal dispute behind the scenes. Now that it's been resolved, I expect the manga's return to be announced sometime this year, likely during Jumo Festa in December.
- Luso Saiyan
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
What I'm excited about is the implication that they'll revisit the other arcs not covered by the movies (Universe 6, Future Trunks, ToP).Mr Baggins wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 10:57 amAgreed. I am thoroughly retired from new Dragon Ball content and will never watch or care about non-Toriyama slop, but I'm also apathetic towards this... what, fifth edition of Battle of Gods? The best version of it was always the first one! Gretchen, stop trying to make fetch happen!
-
The Dark Knight
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Those arcs are in desperate need of a trim, just as much as the retellings are. Cutting them down may not fix everything, but better pacing will go a long way in improving their overall quality.Luso Saiyan wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 11:50 amWhat I'm excited about is the implication that they'll revisit the other arcs not covered by the movies (Universe 6, Future Trunks, ToP).
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Never liked Super, and the reboot will not make any difference.
But I will support the project, because I support the franchise. They have not done anything unforgivable (yet), therefore my loyalty remains.
If the anime has better pacing, I might even watch it, why not? Vegeta is there, Bulma is there. It is worth the shot.
But I will support the project, because I support the franchise. They have not done anything unforgivable (yet), therefore my loyalty remains.
If the anime has better pacing, I might even watch it, why not? Vegeta is there, Bulma is there. It is worth the shot.
BULMA'S OUTFITS
https://www.deviantart.com/saiya6cit/ga ... -s-outfits
WACKY AND MEXICAN DB
https://www.deviantart.com/saiya6cit/ga ... mexican-db
https://www.deviantart.com/saiya6cit/ga ... -s-outfits
WACKY AND MEXICAN DB
https://www.deviantart.com/saiya6cit/ga ... mexican-db
-
The Dark Knight
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Bio-brolySaiya6Cit wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:20 pmThey have not done anything unforgivable (yet), therefore my loyalty remains.
The Black Star arc
The Super 17 arc
The Battle of Gods retelling (2015)
The Resurrection F retelling (2015)
Dragon Ball Evolution
Dragon Ball Minus
Ultimate Tenkaichi
DBZ for kinect
Dragon Ball Final Bout
Vegeta's mustache
There's plenty of unforgivable here.
- SupremeKai25
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4814
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
This looks like a massive upgrade:
https://www.reddit.com/r/dbz/comments/1 ... s_and_the/
I don't know why there's so much negativity on this forum. This is undeniably an improvement.
https://www.reddit.com/r/dbz/comments/1 ... s_and_the/
I don't know why there's so much negativity on this forum. This is undeniably an improvement.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with ToyotaroAt his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
- Luso Saiyan
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
They need/deserve better animation more than pacing, but I'll take both.The Dark Knight wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:02 pmThose arcs are in desperate need of a trim, just as much as the retellings are. Cutting them down may not fix everything, but better pacing will go a long way in improving their overall quality.
-
The Dark Knight
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
So...who's looking forward to the holy green tint on the inevitable home release ?
The difference is honestly night and day; I don't even think it's fair to call this a remaster, as it looks like a full-blown remake. If the "remaster" looks this good, just how amazing is the actual new content in the Moro arc going to look ?SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:31 pm This looks like a massive upgrade:
https://www.reddit.com/r/dbz/comments/1 ... s_and_the/
I don't know why there's so much negativity on this forum. This is undeniably an improvement.
- SupremeKai25
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4814
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
Well yes, it's not a remaster, but not because of the artwork. It's not a remaster because there will be changes. As they said, they'll make revisions and new cuts to better adhere to Akira Toriyama's original vision and world-building.The Dark Knight wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:52 pm So...who's looking forward to the holy green tint on the inevitable home release ?![]()
The difference is honestly night and day; I don't even think it's fair to call this a remaster, as it looks like a full-blown remake. If the "remaster" looks this good, just how amazing is the actual new content in the Moro arc going to look ?SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:31 pm This looks like a massive upgrade:
https://www.reddit.com/r/dbz/comments/1 ... s_and_the/
I don't know why there's so much negativity on this forum. This is undeniably an improvement.
This is -NOT- Super Kai. It's not just an artwork upgrade. It's a remake.
Akira Toriyama, DBS vol.4 joint interview with ToyotaroAt his core Zamasu is good like Shin, though I guess you could say he was so fastidious that it backfired. But you know, for this "Future Trunks Arc" you had to depict Zamasu and Trunks' inner conflict, right? If this was back when I was drawing the manga myself then I doubt if I could have done it. I mean, I'm not very good at depicting the characters' psychology on the page. So this all came together because now I only have to think up the story. [...] On my own, I doubt I would have been able to express Zamasu's fall to the dark side.
-
The Dark Knight
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2025 10:48 am
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
They're calling it an "enhanced" edition, which honestly doesn't do it justice. If Super looked even half this good during its original run, there would've been no negativity surrounding it. Dragon Ball is finally getting the proper sequel it deserves.SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:55 pmThis is -NOT- Super Kai. It's not just an artwork upgrade. It's a remake.
- Luso Saiyan
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
That doesn't make it not a remaster, nor does it make it a remake. It's a remaster because the base work is the same. They are only doing revisions to some shots and scenes. A remake would start from scratch.SupremeKai25 wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:55 pmWell yes, it's not a remaster, but not because of the artwork. It's not a remaster because there will be changes.
- BernardoCairo
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2021 4:09 pm
- Location: Brazil
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
In my subjective opinion:
Remake: made from scratch
Remaster: based on the original work, but updated, modernized, reworked
Rebuild: something almost brand new, inspired by the original work (like the new FFVII games)
Remake: made from scratch
Remaster: based on the original work, but updated, modernized, reworked
Rebuild: something almost brand new, inspired by the original work (like the new FFVII games)
Just sit here and waste your precious time. When you want to do something, don't do it right away. Don't do it when you can. Read my posts instead. It's the only way to live a life without regrets.
- GreatSaiyaJeff
- Regular
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:28 pm
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
So my overall thoughts on the announcements.
1. Moro, excited to finally see that going to be animated. To me it's the best arc in Super.
2. Beerus, I'm annoyed that they are going back to Super to remaster/tweak it. I'm always the mind that skip that 14 episodes and watch the movie. However since they are putting effort to make it look good, I'll still give it a shot.
3. Age 1000 looks interesting from the teaser. I'm guessing it's going to be like Xenoverse 3. Until we get more info in April, I'm more curious then excited.
4. The character poll is great and hilarious to see which characters made it to the top ranks
1. Moro, excited to finally see that going to be animated. To me it's the best arc in Super.
2. Beerus, I'm annoyed that they are going back to Super to remaster/tweak it. I'm always the mind that skip that 14 episodes and watch the movie. However since they are putting effort to make it look good, I'll still give it a shot.
3. Age 1000 looks interesting from the teaser. I'm guessing it's going to be like Xenoverse 3. Until we get more info in April, I'm more curious then excited.
4. The character poll is great and hilarious to see which characters made it to the top ranks
"I just realized something. Honestly... it kinda doesn't matter where I go... whether I'm alive or dead... I'm still pretty dandy." - Space Dandy
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
I have enjoyed all of these. Don't put them on par with freaking Evolution, that's disrespectful. Especially since Bio-Broly does give Goten&Trunks some much needed screentime. And the GT arcs are a fine adventure, while Vegeta's moustache is a gag by AT himself.The Dark Knight wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 12:30 pm Bio-broly
The Black Star arc
The Super 17 arc
Dragon Ball Final Bout
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
1. Being able to "live with something" but also not wanting it to have happened is not contradictory at all. I'm saying it's not ideal and I don't like it, but I'm not livid about it. This is an extremely common perspective you, I, and everyone else has about many things life. We come to terms with things we ultimately don't like or want. That's life.Vhanos wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 7:38 amYou say you can live with Super being remade. But you wish it didn't go this route. That's contradictory. You think it's worthless and mostly forgettable. Well that's your opinion. I don't share your take.Artorias wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 3:01 am The fact that we're at least getting Moro down the line softens the blow of the Super remake/remaster announcement. Good strategy on their part to lead with the more exciting announcement first. I can live with Super being remade to lead up to the new content, but I still ideally wish they would not have gone this route.
Specifically regarding just the first "Beerus" arc, my biggest problem with BoG getting remade AGAIN is that this just isn't a story that is worth 4 retellings. It's not some complicated or particularly well written classic tale that warrants this much attention and re-examination. It's a nice little story that should have stayed as a 2013 anime film that came out to kickstart the new age of Dragon Ball and set up the new framework of the world going forward, but for some reason I'm now going to be watching Goku fight the purple talking cat on King Kai's planet yet again more than a decade later. There's just absolutely no reason we should still be dwelling on this story 13 years later after it's original release. And the same can be said for most of Super. I find it to be such a waste fundamentally to be dumping a bunch of time and resources into "enhancing" a story this worthless and mostly forgettable. It frankly just doesn't deserve it in my opinion. A polished turd is still a turd at the end of the day. Super at this point should've been what GT became in most people's minds: a poorly executed TV show from decades past that came and went and never lived up to expectations that we all collectively then moved on from. I'm sick of thinking about this empty mishap of a show 11 years later and counting.
In case you didn't know. There were a lot of complaints about the animation back then when Super came out. The remaster is doing what people didn't think they would be getting.
A polished turd is still a turd at the end of the day you say. That's a turd take. If you're sick of this series then maybe it just isn't for you.
It might seem wasteful and pointless to you. But to others it isn't. You might think it's a waste. But to them it's not.Artorias wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 3:11 am
I get it, and the fact that it's not a full blown remake but instead seems to just be closer to a "remaster" definitely helps. I'm not mad at this announcement, like I said I can certainly live with it. I just find it to be wasteful and pointless. And it seems they are doing some full blown new animation cuts, it's not all just touch ups of old footage. Several talented animators are on this apparently as well, so I don't know. Having someone as talented as Takahashi spending his time re-animating Dragon Ball Super of all things seems like such a waste to me.
If you think Super should be ignored and pretend it doesn't exist, I cannot agree with you. If it were such a disaster it wouldn't be having people watching it. Super had interesting things about it despite what the naysayers say. As for Daima. That turned out to be pretty good.Artorias wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 3:26 am
I agree with pretty much everything you're saying in an objective sense. I was just mostly coming at it from my own personal reaction of being in the fandom for years and wanting desperately to move on from what I see as a borderline disaster of a show. Call me dramatic, but instead of dwelling on the Super era and bending over backwards to pull new fans into the Super storyline, I would rather them do the opposite, which is ignore Super and pretend it basically doesn't exist, and start fresh from ground zero moving forward. Kinda like what they did with Daima (even though I didn't end up liking that show either). I know this is unrealistic, but a man can dream.
2. I fully understand the animation was bad, and I get WHY they're doing it. I'm just expressing the fact that I don't think it's worth it. Sometimes it's okay to just let things live in the past and remain a mistake, and move on.
3. "If it were such a disaster people wouldn't have watched it" is an obvious fallacy, come on. We all know that the number of people that consume a product has nothing to do with how good or bad it is. I clearly meant that it was a "disaster" from a writing and story perspective. It was obviously very successful financially, I would never argue against that.
4. A lot of your post is just "no I disagree", and I mean...yea that's fine. I don't expect everyone to agree with me. I'm fully aware some people enjoyed Super. A lot of us also didn't. A lot of us found it be a slog to get through. Both perspectives are legitimate and can coexist. And just because I didn't care for the Super era doesn't mean I'm magically now somehow not a Dragon Ball fan.
- DragonBalllKaiHD
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:37 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: Dragon Ball Genkida Matsuri 2026 on january 25th will have Dragon Ball announcements
You act as if it’s definitive that Dragon Ball cannot be good without Toriyama. They absolutely can make good contents with Dragon Ball.Mr Baggins wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 10:57 amAgreed. I am thoroughly retired from new Dragon Ball content and will never watch or care about non-Toriyama slop, but I'm also apathetic towards this... what, fifth edition of Battle of Gods? The best version of it was always the first one! Gretchen, stop trying to make fetch happen!MCDaveG wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 8:13 am IMHO Dragon Ball died with the original creator and now there are remakes and scraping the barrel on whatever unfinished work (or finished but fucked up by rights holders) he had.
The most cynical part of all though is the Moro adaptation having "Akira Toriyama" plastered over the key visual when people know good and damn well that was Toyotaro's baby. And it's not even coming until like 2027 or some shit.
Somebody in another thread said something to the effect of "move over Daima, here's the real hype" and I'm still lol'ing
Even if it’s Toyotaro’s creation, it’s still Toriyama’s IP. Everything and anything with Dragon World belongs to Toriyama and Toyotaro is using his IP to continue the story. Don’t read too much into it.
Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru's #1 biggest fan





