The Dark Knight wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 1:58 am
mecha3000 wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 1:40 amAnd also, let's be honest, they're also remaking Super leading into the new arcs to milk Toriyama's material as long as they can. I mean, sure, they're honoring him by remaking the arcs he said had bad animation. But also, they know without Toriyama, his existing material is all the more sacred, which explains why we're getting Dragon Ball Super: Beerus.
To be fair to them, both the remake and Granola arcs were green lit while he was still alive, as he contributed story tidbits for both.
mecha3000 wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 1:40 amSuper getting remade makes me feel old, man.
Someone yesterday said "there's no need to remake that old movie", and the first thing I thought was "that's not old, it came out in...shit, I'm old now".
Yeah, I do remember Geekdom101 saying Toriyama was contributing new stuff to the remake. But I still believe it came from a place of "We know Toriyama's not going to contribute to Dragon Ball forever so let's milk his existing material as long as we can". I could be wrong about that, though. But remember, when Toei approached Toriyama back in the late 2000s to make a new Dragon Ball series, he refused apparently. That is why we got Dragon Ball Kai. I think Super Kai is a similar situation. Maybe, Toriyama was like "I can't really be bothered constantly making new material, but I'm fine touching up my old material". I could be wrong and I don't want to misquote him at all if that wasn't the case.
And as for the remake, yeah, people forget Battle of Gods is now 13 years old. I remember hearing Geekdom, I think (not sure if it was him or someone else) say, "WHY ARE THEY REMAKING SOMETHING THAT'S ONLY 13 YEARS OLD?!" And I'm like, BRO, 13 YEARS IS A LONG ASS TIME!!! What do you mean ONLY?!!! 13 years is the difference from 1987 to 2000. 2000 to 2013. 2013 to NOW. And like I keep saying, Hunter x Hunter 1999 ended up getting remade as Hunter x Hunter 2011 only 12 years later. And obviously, both series are night and day because of the difference between animation in 1999 and 2011.
So, yeah, I think it's completely fine for them to redo Super and get it right this time. And as someone who's interested in business, this makes sense from a business point of view. It allows Super to rebrand itself (even with that cool new blue logo) to sync itself more with how they plan to do future arcs like The Galactic Patrol and beyond. And to introduce it to a new generation and new fans. So, unlike a lot of people, I'm actually really interested to see Super: Beerus and the other arcs get redone. And if Crunchyroll redubs it, I'm really curious about how that will be handled and if there will be any recasts. Imagine Monica Rial gets recast as Bulma and it's like a repeat of 2010, only instead of Tiffany Volmer getting replaced, it's Rial. That would be wild. And of course, that's just an example, but fascinating to think about nonetheless. SUPER KAI, LET'S GO!!!