omegacwa wrote:You are blatantly ignoring other facts to sway your opinion. I really don't want to delve into it, but there is much more than that.
Well, maybe I missed a
few points, but the fact remains that there are far more non-DB elements than DB. And no, having the basic
plot outline doesn’t cut it. If you keep that and change everything else (“Peter Parker gets bitten by a radioactive spider and obtains superpowers; neglects using them to stop a criminal who murders his uncle; vows to fight crime from then on out—and oh yeah
he’s super-enthusiastic about what he does, lives in the woods, constantly hungry, has a monk for a sidekick, and has never touched a textbook in his life!”) it stops being what it originally set out to be.
Also, I am in the "cult" because I am not angry over the movie, and I am willing to defend it until I see it.
But, didn’t you deride other people for
offending it before they saw it? How is that any different?
If it turns out wretchedly bad, which I doubt cause I haven't seen a movie that was mainstream that was really bad in a while
What effect does the quality of previous movies have on this one?
until I have seen a horrible botching of the franchise to the point that it is unrecognizable, which as of yet has not happened to me, I will remain indifferent.
If it were
completely unrecognizable we would not be having this discussion because nobody here would recognize it. Obviously, there are
some recognizable elements, but there simply aren’t
enough.
I think people have way to high standards for movies or something.
How high is too high?
Seriously, there are people who thought Transformers was bad? Seriously? That movie was a lot of fun, it's not like it was an oscar winning Drama, but that's not what it was supposed to be. Oh "The transformers weren't all blocky looking like the cartoon!" are you kidding, that would have looked horrible.
Are you saying that a faithful-looking
Dragon Ball would have looked horrible? One with, say, color?
I think people need to see a bad movie, like an actual bad movie, then they might understand. As I grew up on movies, I understand what makes something good/bad, my dad is a huge movie buff so I was pretty much raised on movies. I have seen some really horrible stuff.
So have I. For every bad movie there are a dozen more worse ones out there. But they’re still
bad. You could stick anything next to the stinkers and it would look good by comparison; you’re interpreting the negative reactions on too broad a scale. DBE looks bad by
Hollywood standards. It is obviously going to be leagues better than your Z-movie Horror film. That doesn’t mean we’re all somehow obligated to enjoy it.
The reality is that Hollywood is a shitty place, with so many people trying to get there way that we are even lucky we got as much to look correct as we did.
Granted, but we were all doing just fine
without a live-action movie. Why should we be grateful for the few odd bones they throw us when we weren’t even hungry in the first place?
Example: At one point Kevin Smith and some other guy/producer were signed on to write the next Superman film back in the mid nineties. This producer guy told Kevin he could write whatever he wanted, but Superman couldn't fly, had to wear a black costume with no cape, and had to fight a giant mechanical spider. Kevin Smith rightfully backed out, and that other guy went on to make Wild Wild West.
And the difference here would be that the proverbial Kevin Smith actually went ahead and birthed the monster, despite it being not even close to what the fans would actually want and expect.
omegacwa wrote:No.
For example, if Vegeta is portrayed as a woman in a possible sequel, Fox can say goodbye to the little support I have given them
Alas, we
finally hear what would actually
upset the pro-crowd: gender-bending!
I almost
want them to do it, just so I can hear some people giving it the Mai Defense: “But,
she’s hot, man…”