Dragon Ball Z Being Re-edited and Re-dubbed for HDTV

Discussion specifically regarding the "refreshed" TV version of DBZ created in Japan for its 20th anniversary, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Chibi Mystic Gohan
I Live Here
Posts: 2890
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Wakusei Bejeeter

Post by Chibi Mystic Gohan » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:06 pm

Yi Xing Long wrote:By the way, Toriyama is responsible for the Jump special.
In what way?

Chrono Trigger
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Chrono Trigger » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:08 pm

I mean seriously though would anybody be less excited if TOEI was just going back an redoing the all of Z instead of just clipping out some filler?
I completely respect your opinion, and I respect you. I enjoyed discussing this with you, even if I don't completely agree.

If we're all here for a reason then I'm just visiting.

If it's held in your heart then you can't let go.

Saiyan
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by Saiyan » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:11 pm

A couple of counter points to those against a brand new re-animated DBZ, especially the person who put up the "You look pretty cool, Naruto" thing.

Naruto is somewhat of a different monster than DBKai, seeing as how Naruto is still in production, and would result in some rushing in terms of quality control, as they had to produce these episodes week after week. Dragonball is a finished deal, so Toei could start pushing out newly animated episodes at their leisure if they ever felt like it.

Another thing is that Naruto is animated by Studio Pierrot, rather than Toei. I feel that Toei does a much better job with anything they get their hands on. Of course, I wouldn't really know that since the only show that I can name off the top of my head is One Piece, and End of Evangelion..I think. But comparing the three big shows (One Piece, Naruto, and Bleach), One Piece definitely kept me interested much more than the other two visually (also story-telling wise, I couldn't stand Naruto/Bleach filler), which were animated by Pierrot.

EDIT: Couple quick changes to make my post make a bit more sense.
Last edited by Saiyan on Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Super Ghost Kamikaze
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1809
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:10 pm

Post by Super Ghost Kamikaze » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:11 pm

Chrono Trigger wrote:I mean seriously though would anybody be less excited if TOEI was just going back an redoing the all of Z instead of just clipping out some filler?
They'd have more to potentially mess up, as far as I'm concerned.

The special was really neat, for something that only lasted as long as it did. But a lot of what I love about Dragon Ball the anime is the look of the 80s animation.

I wouldn't want them to completely re-animate Dragon Ball, because the likelihood that it would look like every other piece of Shonen crap coming out these days(sorry One Piece and Naruto fans) would be increased.

User avatar
Yi Xing Long
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:10 pm

Post by Yi Xing Long » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:11 pm

Chrono Trigger wrote:I mean seriously though would anybody be less excited if TOEI was just going back an redoing the all of Z instead of just clipping out some filler?
They would never re-animate the entire series as-is. If they were to ever re-animate it, they would obviously cut out certain filler elements (especially those that create plot holes).

Chrono Trigger
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Chrono Trigger » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:12 pm

Yi Xing Long wrote:They would never re-animate the entire series as-is. If they were to ever re-animate it, they would obviously cut out certain filler elements (especially those that create plot holes).
Yeah that's what I meant. They reanimate the whole thing, 100 episodes, little to no filler.
I completely respect your opinion, and I respect you. I enjoyed discussing this with you, even if I don't completely agree.

If we're all here for a reason then I'm just visiting.

If it's held in your heart then you can't let go.

User avatar
snaku
Regular
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:02 am
Location: HFl L
Contact:

Post by snaku » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:14 pm

Chrono Trigger wrote:Yeah that's what I meant. They reanimate the whole thing, 100 episodes, little to no filler.
No, I wouldn't be less excited. But it's a moot point now.

Chrono Trigger
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1269
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Chrono Trigger » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:22 pm

Yes it is because they're already going through with it and its gonna be such a waste.
I completely respect your opinion, and I respect you. I enjoyed discussing this with you, even if I don't completely agree.

If we're all here for a reason then I'm just visiting.

If it's held in your heart then you can't let go.

User avatar
snaku
Regular
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:02 am
Location: HFl L
Contact:

Post by snaku » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:25 pm

Chrono Trigger wrote:Yes it is because they're already going through with it and its gonna be such a waste.
I think it's a tad early to be jumping to those kind of conclusions.

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15277
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Chuquita » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:29 pm

bkev wrote:No, it's his face. You have to copy&paste the url link in your browser due to direct linking issues.

OH. ^^;

*Does so.*

Oof. That's pretty bad. >_O
Wish I knew where that headless Naruto screenshot got to; I'd post that up.


Anyway, NOW I remember yet another reason why I'm very, very thankful that its Toei that has the rights to animating Dragon Ball and not Studio Pierrot.
On hiatus.

User avatar
Kendamu
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 7000
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
Location: The Martial Arts World

Post by Kendamu » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:30 pm

I'm sure that if it were completely reanimated, people would be whining because it's completely reanimated and that they like the old style better.

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Post by B » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:36 pm

So no one has to sit through what I just read: People will find SOMETHING to complain about.

Or, you can just read your friendly neighborhood Kendamu's sig.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
Mayuri Furiza Kurotsuchi
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:57 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California
Contact:

Post by Mayuri Furiza Kurotsuchi » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:05 pm

Yi Xing Long wrote:
Mayuri Furiza Kurotsuchi wrote:Do you know how expensive full animation is compared to what they are doing? Sure, they may have the money for it, but the finished product will be a lot worse than what it will be if they improve on existing art. I doubt we want to see 100 newly animated episodes of Dragonball with every other episode having a "hey Goku, you look kind of cool"* feel to it, instead of the best of 294 episodes made even better.
Actually, it would possibly be cheaper to re-animate it all over again compared to restoring it properly in addition to the redone voice acting, cutting and pasting of footage, and supposed extending of the sides of frames among many other factors.
That wasn't really my point though. Even if reanimating was cheaper, we would start to see the effects of the low budget not any later than the second episode. I'd rather see an improved version of Dragonball's best than even more cheap animation.

User avatar
Saiyan-Professor
I Live Here
Posts: 2057
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: Planet Saiya
Contact:

Post by Saiyan-Professor » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:12 pm

Super Ghost Kamikaze wrote:...I wouldn't want them to completely re-animate Dragon Ball, because the likelihood that it would look like every other piece of Shonen crap coming out these days(sorry One Piece and Naruto fans) would be increased.
Yeah, but they would get plenty money from that “Shonen crap”, some of us would appreciate a new Dragonball Z resembling Naruto or Bleach.
The Saiyans are very much like the Klingons and Jem'Hadar.

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17803
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Post by VegettoEX » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:14 pm

Let's try to *not* get into other-show-arguments, here. Thanks!
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Bussani » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:32 pm

For the record, I'm in no way against a completely new series based on the manga with new animation. I've always thought that would be great to see, although I'm sure people would find ways to complain about it anyway.

But I wouldn't call what they're doing now a waste. O_o

User avatar
snaku
Regular
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:02 am
Location: HFl L
Contact:

Post by snaku » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:38 pm

Bussani wrote:But I wouldn't call what they're doing now a waste. O_o
I think that assertion was just another example of unchecked emotional internet hyperbole.

User avatar
Super Ghost Kamikaze
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1809
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:10 pm

Post by Super Ghost Kamikaze » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:04 am

VegettoEX wrote:Let's try to *not* get into other-show-arguments, here. Thanks!
Wasn't trying to. Just saying that I'm happy with the anime's distinct look, and I don't want it to look like everything else due to the over-commercialization and computer-generated aspects of modern Japanese animation. ;)

User avatar
Zenkai Power
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:07 am

Post by Zenkai Power » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:05 am

This is becoming more exciting. A new name, etc. But Wasted Wisher, have you SEEN any of the footage from any of the episodes for HD? Does it really look GOOD?

I mean how good can you make a 1989-1995/6 cel-animated cartoon shot on 16mm film anyway? How seamlessly can they really extend the backgrounds or actual animation? Are they actually editing the existing animation to look better in HD (like after a HD transfer of the film?) or just the film itself?

Also, I'm happy they're cutting out the filler but just editing the episodes together seems to make me wonder how well it will actually work. I mean, they have to work with what they already have. So, it just seems like re-animating it would make more sense? I mean they could re-animate it almost exactly like last time (like the 2008 special's intro was so close to the original). Are they kind of doing that with DBK? Are they animating over existing animation or is it not going that far?

... just doesn't seem like it could be THAT great in HD. Although I know there are people out there who are crazy about HD. (I'm not one of them)

But yeah, I mean they're going so far with the music and the voice acting being redone for HD that it makes less sense to me to just use 80s animation... it doesn't seem like it could EVER look THAT great no matter what they do.

Also, the OPs and End credits are going to be new? So will they look like the 2008 special in animation? How will that look so weird after seeing a cool new animated OP and then suddenly you're in 80s-animation-land. (or early 90s, whatever)...

I'm exciting for DBK. Truly. But I am not 100% sure it's going to be that great. It's not like I haven't seen it before. I hope they really impress me.

I'm more excited about the possibilities of what ELSE Toei might do if DBK is very successful. New series, movies, specials, etc.

User avatar
TheGreatness25
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5004
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Post by TheGreatness25 » Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:23 am

Yeah, that's what bugs me. It's a show from the late 80's/early 90's. I mean...stop trying to revitalize it and leave it alone.

Post Reply