Super Saiyan Turlast x4 wrote:Not really. Vegeta had no relevance to this, so it's the same with Gohan. His hair never was the same once the world tournament started.rereboy wrote:No. Hair isn`t a proof of anything. But an indication? Yes, it is.
Vegeta`s hair is already all "spiked up". In SSJ 2 the hair gets more "spiked" than in SSJ 1. For Vegeta its impossible to be even more "spiked", illustration wise. That`s why his hairstyle doesn`t change at all in SSJ 1. So he`s a special case. Goku however, gets to have even more spiked hair in SSJ 2. If Vegeta had hair like Goku, his hair would also be clearly more "spiked".
In Vegeta its impossible to tell apart his normal hair from a spiked SSJ 2 hair.
Its like Raditz could turn into a SSJ3. Could you tell the difference in the hair?
Totally different scenario.Just look at Gohan`s SSJ 1 hair and Gohan`s SSJ 2 hair when he was fighting Cell. It`s clearly different.
How?
He`s a SSJ 1 and then he becomes a SSJ 2 fighting Cell. His hair changes. There are only two possibilites. Either the SSJ 2 changes the hair, making it more "spiked" or it doesn`t. Either way there is a mistake in the manga regarding this.
If it doesn`t change the hair then he shouldn`t have any other hairstyle, implying that the transformation changed it.
If it does change the hair, then it should be clearly visible the changes in the hairstyle since, as I showed you, Buu saga Gohan is drawn with at least two SSJ hairstyles.
So why doesn't Vegeta's hair change? It's not a rule. We know Vegeta is different because of the aura, which is always there in the Manga when they're Super Saiyan 2. The Anime, however, forgets it sometimes.And if the hair changed with the transformation when Gohan was fighting Cell, then SSJ 2`s hair is meant to be different from SSJ 1`s hair. Even Goku`s SSJ 2 hair is drawn differently than his SSJ 1 hair.
As I said, "Vegeta`s hair is already all "spiked up". In SSJ 2 the hair gets more "spiked" than in SSJ 1. For Vegeta its impossible to be even more "spiked", illustration wise. That`s why his hairstyle doesn`t change at all in SSJ 1. So he`s a special case. Goku however, gets to have even more spiked hair in SSJ 2. If Vegeta had hair like Goku, his hair would also be clearly more "spiked".
In Vegeta its impossible to tell apart his normal hair from a spiked SSJ 2 hair.
Its like Raditz could turn into a SSJ3. Could you tell the difference in the hair?"
Yep. And the first hairstyle was retconned into the one we see from the beginning of the world tournament to the end, as we see.As I clearly showed you, Gohan has two different SSJ hairstyles during the buu saga.
If SSJ2 makes the hair more spiked, like it is seen in the Cell saga and with SSJ2 Goku, then having Gohan with the same exact hairstyle in SSJ 1and SSJ 2 is a mistake. He should have different hairstyles.
Even worse, he is drawed with at least two different SSJ hairstyles during the same saga (buu saga) which just shows the extent of the mistake.
The hair isn't a mistake, since we've see him with that hair before he was stated "to take it up a level!" That clears it all up right there.And, as I clearly showed you, during the Dabura fight Gohan has SSJ 2 hair without visible lightning, which is obviously a mistake since the author has already made clear in the manga that, in SSJ 2, hair changes. So he should have lightning or have the SSJ 1 hairstyle.
Really? Then how do we explain SSJ Gohan hairstyle when he was training to that tournament other than saying that there is a mistake somewhere?
He shouldn't have lighning in either part. The Videl one happened before he stated he was going beyond the Super Saiyan--and the Z-sword happened way after all of that stuff, anyway.What you said are just another two moments where obviously there must also be a mistake.
In those moments (the videl moment and sword moment) Gohan should have lightning or the SSJ 1 hairstyle.
Then he shouldn`t have SSJ 2 hairstyle. Simple.
It makes no sense for Gohan to be in regular Super Saiyan form while Vegeta and Goku have the proper aura on the following page. That's not a mistake--that's AT not placing Gohan in Super Saiyan 2 form.
Not sure I understood what you are saying here. But basically you are suggesting that there are mistakes regarding the illustration of Gohan`s SSJ 2 form. Which is what I`m saying.
Not really. All stated Super Saiyan 2 warriors have an aura that's different from others--and the hair thing could simply be a retcon. The lightning is far more relevant then the hair, mainly because it leaves out Vegeta. If it's a significant trait, then it must apply to all of them--not just 2 of them.But the hair is an indication of the SSJ 2 state as much as the lightning is. Otherwise, the author wouldn`t have changed Gohan`s hair when he first transformed in SSJ 2 in the Cell Saga.
Then please draw me a picture of Vegeta with even "spikier" hair than his base hair.
See what I mean?
Totally different form. And this also has the lightning for the most part.Also, the SSJ 3 state has a different hairstyle as well, which furthermore is a indication that hair is different in each SSJ state.
Yes, it is a different form. So? SSJ 2 was shown to give the user a different hairstyle in the manga. And so did SSJ 3. Thats all I was saying.
Conclusion:
If "spikier" hair isn`t a trait of the SSJ 2 form, then Gohan shouldn`t have a different hairstyle when he first transformed into a SSJ2, because that implies that the transformation changes his hair. And neither should Goku.
If it is a trait then buu saga Gohan should have two different SSJ hairstyles. And even if the author chose to give him the same hairstyle, then he should never have illustrated Gohan with two different SSJ hairstyles during that saga, like I showed you.
Which means there are mistakes regarding this. And so there can be mistakes regarding the lightning as well as the daizenshuu implies. It`s up to interpretation.
It would be very easy to say if Gohan was a SSJ 2 in the fight with Dabura if the hairstyle had no mistakes.
This is what makes the matter rage on.





