Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
Senzu_Bean
I Live Here
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:31 am

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Senzu_Bean » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:14 am

Xyex wrote:
goku the krump dancer wrote:The thing that bothers me is that, if Gohan had become so much more powerful than Gotenks and Buu then why was he crushed so easily after Buu absorbed Gotenks and piccolo?? That must mean that Gohan wasnt that much stronger than Gotenks and that Gotenks would have beaten super Buu just as easily if he was serious from jump street.
It's actually pretty simple and logical.

Super Buu - 100
SSJ3 Gotenks - 105
Ultimate Gohan - 145
Super Buu2 - 205
No! Gotenks is closer to Gohan that he is too Shin Buu.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4233
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Was Gohan...?

Post by Kid Buu » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:24 pm

Bussani wrote:Well, technically it was Gohan who finally crushed Vegeta and ended the fight.
That is how I have always viewed it. In my opinion Gohan was the one that actually defeated Vegeta, not Goku.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: Was Gohan...?

Post by penguintruth » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:34 pm

Kid Buu wrote:
Bussani wrote:Well, technically it was Gohan who finally crushed Vegeta and ended the fight.
That is how I have always viewed it. In my opinion Gohan was the one that actually defeated Vegeta, not Goku.
It was a group effort. None of them could have won on their own. Gohan just put things over the top.

But it was clear what that battle was pointing to, which was Gohan, coming into more of his power. And throughout Namek. And then in the Cell Games.

I think it was pretty clear the story was building up to Gohan becoming the new hero. Unfortunately, it didn't take.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4233
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Was Gohan...?

Post by Kid Buu » Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:11 am

penguintruth wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:
Bussani wrote:Well, technically it was Gohan who finally crushed Vegeta and ended the fight.
That is how I have always viewed it. In my opinion Gohan was the one that actually defeated Vegeta, not Goku.
It was a group effort. None of them could have won on their own.
Don't get me wrong, I one hundred percent agree with that.

Interestingly enough, here is what page 29 of the booklet that comes with the first Dragon Box says:
It was thought that even Goku would not be able defeat Vegeta. It was Goku's son Gohan who defeated Vegeta! There must have been many people who felt a new generation's arrival with this heoric deed.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Was Gohan...?

Post by Rocketman » Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:12 am

Kid Buu wrote:
Bussani wrote:Well, technically it was Gohan who finally crushed Vegeta and ended the fight.
That is how I have always viewed it. In my opinion Gohan was the one that actually defeated Vegeta, not Goku.
Gohan only transformed because of the Moon Ball. Vegeta defeated Vegeta.

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by penguintruth » Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:21 am

Vegeta's screw ups power most of the plot of DBZ.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4233
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Kid Buu » Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:28 am

penguintruth wrote:Vegeta's screw ups power most of the plot of DBZ.
In Vegeta's defence, the moon ball wasn't such a screw up when he was crushing every bone in Goku's body.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6131
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:50 am

But it was definitely a screw up when he got in the way of the weasel's last fart. That'll get you every time!
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 3/16/26!)
Current Episode: Course-Correcting the Movies - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 2

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:21 am

Senzu_Bean wrote:
No! Gotenks is closer to Gohan that he is too Shin Buu.
Shin Buu? What?


I think you mean Kid Buu or Pure Buu.

User avatar
caejones
I Live Here
Posts: 3125
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:37 am
Contact:

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by caejones » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:06 am

Xyex wrote:
goku the krump dancer wrote:The thing that bothers me is that, if Gohan had become so much more powerful than Gotenks and Buu then why was he crushed so easily after Buu absorbed Gotenks and piccolo?? That must mean that Gohan wasnt that much stronger than Gotenks and that Gotenks would have beaten super Buu just as easily if he was serious from jump street.
It's actually pretty simple and logical.

Super Buu - 100
SSJ3 Gotenks - 105
Ultimate Gohan - 145
Super Buu2 - 205
Hey, Buu absorbed Piccolo, too! :mad:
... make that, like, 220! :P
Dr Gero, in Budokai 2 wrote:Go, my Saiba Rangers!
Akira Toriyama, in Son Goku Densetsu wrote:You really can’t go by rumors (laughs).

Senzu_Bean
I Live Here
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:31 am

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Senzu_Bean » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:22 am

Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
Senzu_Bean wrote:
No! Gotenks is closer to Gohan that he is too Shin Buu.
Shin Buu? What?


I think you mean Kid Buu or Pure Buu.
No, Shin Buu = Super Buu.

User avatar
Godo
I Live Here
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:25 am

Re: Was Gohan...?

Post by Godo » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:28 am

Rocketman wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:
Bussani wrote:Well, technically it was Gohan who finally crushed Vegeta and ended the fight.
That is how I have always viewed it. In my opinion Gohan was the one that actually defeated Vegeta, not Goku.
Gohan only transformed because of the Moon Ball. Vegeta defeated Vegeta.
Gohan only transformed into SSJ2 because of Cell's taunting. Cell defeated Cell.
Goku only transformed into SSJ because of Freeza killing Kuririn. Freeza defeated Freeza.
Vegeta only thought up using a spirit bomb against Buu because of that Buu took out too much of Goku's SSJ3 energy and was too tough. Buu defeated Buu.

See where I am going?

User avatar
Chibi Mystic Gohan
I Live Here
Posts: 2890
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Wakusei Bejeeter

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Chibi Mystic Gohan » Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:44 pm

Senzu_Bean wrote:
Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
Senzu_Bean wrote:
No! Gotenks is closer to Gohan that he is too Shin Buu.
Shin Buu? What?


I think you mean Kid Buu or Pure Buu.
No, Shin Buu = Super Buu.
I really hate that fan term.
Godo wrote:Cell defeated Cell
So Steve's translation in movie 9 wasn't wrong after all?! :D
君と再会ったとき 子供のころ大切に想っていた景色を思い出したんだ
僕と踊ってくれないか 光と影の Winding Road いまでも彼に夢中なの?

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Herms » Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:04 pm

Chibi Mystic Gohan wrote:I really hate that fan term.
Me too. I can never remember if it's supposed to be shin as in "new" and refer to Super Boo, or shin as in "true" and refer to Kid Boo. And somehow I have a feeling neither do the people using the term.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

User avatar
Savage68
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1929
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Savage68 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:21 pm

'Shin' Buu is almost as bad as 'Chou' Gohan.

User avatar
Chibi Mystic Gohan
I Live Here
Posts: 2890
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Wakusei Bejeeter

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Chibi Mystic Gohan » Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:24 pm

Herms wrote:
Chibi Mystic Gohan wrote:I really hate that fan term.
Me too. I can never remember if it's supposed to be shin as in "new" and refer to Super Boo, or shin as in "true" and refer to Kid Boo. And somehow I have a feeling neither do the people using the term.
That, and I think it just sounds stupid. I've always thought Super Boo sounded pretty good, since the Japanese call everything super-something anyway. And the Japanese name for him ("Evil Majin Boo" in the Daizenshuu, if I'm not mistaken) is used by English-speaking fans to refer to the skinny Boo anyway ("Pure-evil Majin Boo," right?), so it gets confusing.
君と再会ったとき 子供のころ大切に想っていた景色を思い出したんだ
僕と踊ってくれないか 光と影の Winding Road いまでも彼に夢中なの?

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:18 pm

Senzu_Bean wrote:
Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
Senzu_Bean wrote:
No! Gotenks is closer to Gohan that he is too Shin Buu.
Shin Buu? What?


I think you mean Kid Buu or Pure Buu.
No, Shin Buu = Super Buu.
No, Shin Buu = True Buu

Chou Buu = Super Buu

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17801
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by VegettoEX » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:20 pm

I've never, ever seen a flat-out "Shin Buu" used as a reference to or name for any particular form or transformation of the character. Who uses this? Where? Is it specific to a single language's fanbase?
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:21 pm

VegettoEX wrote:I've never, ever seen a flat-out "Shin Buu" used as a reference to or name for any particular form or transformation of the character. Who uses this? Where? Is it specific to a single language's fanbase?
You're not alone, I've never seen it either.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Gohan intended to take the leading role?

Post by Herms » Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:26 pm

VegettoEX wrote:I've never, ever seen a flat-out "Shin Buu" used as a reference to or name for any particular form or transformation of the character. Who uses this? Where? Is it specific to a single language's fanbase?
It's very commonly used on the My Favorite Games forum.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

Post Reply