sangofe wrote:Cons:
- the incredible stupid decision of taking Pan on the tour instead of Goten.
- the animation that makes the characters actually feel much less stronger than in DBZ, it just feels like they fight much slower with very little impact.
- not very original story arcs.
1)
Dragon Ball has to have at least one true child protagonist at all times. This shouldn't be a surprise.
2) I think that could very easily be argued as a positive.
3) How the hell are the Baby and Shadow Dragon arcs not original?
LeprikanGT wrote:The cons: it was rushed and most of the animation is crappy aside from fight scenes; especially Kid Goku's hands. They look like little stick nubs with no knuckles. And of course the first 16 episodes.
What? The episodes done by Last House look terrible, and have looked terrible ever since the Cell Games. Aside from that,
GT has great animation. I'm not really sure how you can argue otherwise.
Jon Jon wrote:the ending is the most incomplete thing ever
Wait,
what? Or are you just one of those people that needs the ending to any genre fiction to come with a neat little bow on it?
Pros
The truth about
GT is it's actually a very entertaining show. The color palette is gorgeous, the tone is an enjoyable mix of action and comedy-adventure, and the music is excellent. Although, it's only fitting for the pastel-colored space opera that is
GT and not the kung-fu homages that the other two series are.
I also love the place in the character's lives
GT takes place during. The characters, Goku aside, are old and tired and settled down. "But the character designs are all gross and not bad-ass looking! Bwaa!" That's the entire point. They've all gotten frumpy and complacent.
GT feels like an epilogue, and that's really cool.
The villains and locales are some of the most original in the series. Toriyama is great, but he has certain tropes he sticks to character-wise, and his favorite fight scenery is plains and canyons.
GT tosses in the crazy super powers right and left, and takes you from swamps to asteroids to the middle of forests, and back again. Cool stuff.
Fuckin' Giru. Nuff said.
Every arc actually connects to the characters and their actions in some way, from Saiyan past, to defeated villains, to their abuse of the Dragon Balls. Speaking of which, the series actually placed focus back on the titular objects for the first time since the Freeza arc.
The ending is the best idea Toriyama never had, and a perfect thematic conclusion for the series. For years,
Dragon Ball had been dropping hints that, hey, it's not really cool to just keep falling back on the Dragon Balls to fix your mistakes. From Kami saying he had no intention of reviving Shen-long to Old Kaioshin's warnings about universal balance and whatnot. By the Buu arc, the characters couldn't be assed to care who was getting killed; they had the Dragon Balls, so I guess it was just whatever. The Shadow Dragons were the perfect way to deal with that, and even though everyone gets aaaaall upset because they were monsters-of-the-week instead of
SUPER HARDCORE BAD-ASSES, they continued
GT's trend of having very cool, unique villains. The 28th Tenkaichi Budokai was the perfect ending for Goku's character, but
GT is the perfect ending for the overall series.
The last episode is awesome.
Oh, and Goku totally died stopping that blast.
(The Actual) Cons
It is slightly Goku-centric; that's a legitimate complaint. The side characters do have a tendency to jump into fights only to be beaten down in a short burst of music to build up Goku's awesomeness. However, I fail to see how it's any more than slightly worse than the original
Dragon Ball in this aspect.
The fights are less hand-based than ever. This isn't a problem in the early episodes, where the fights are short and the adventure is the focus, but once the series moves back into hero vs villain territory, it becomes a little tiresome. Cool villains and interesting scenery aside, it gets a little stale when everything devolves into ki-blast after ki-blast.
It somewhat ruins the impact of the 28th Tenkaichi Budokai by sidelining Uub after his first real fight. Which is a shame, because he's fairly firmly established as second strongest hero in the series after Goku and Vegeta.
Overall
There's no doubt that
GT has a different feel than
Dragon Ball and
Z, and I'm not going to say it's just as good. Although I would argue it's more competently handled than the anime version of either, in terms of pacing, etc.
People love to get hung up on the fact that it contains some inconsistencies and contrivances, which I find is a ridiculous complaint for
Dragon Ball-anything, and the perceived lack of bad-assery in its characters, which is absolutely a good thing and and a complaint best left for grammatically incorrect Youtube comments.
I actually have a suspicion that a lot of the flack
GT gets in the American fanbase stems from the days when Power Level "debates" were the name of the game, and people were upset with it for things like its (easily explained) Super Saiyan Gohan, lack of Super Saiyan 2, and again, the perceived weakening of its cast. If we can all agree that Power Level debates are stupid, I hope we can agree on most of these complaints being stupid as well. It's a kid's series. Shut up and stop arguing about internal logic that was never present from the start.
GT's one of those things that consistently gets hated on. Yet nearly every time I hear about someone actually sitting down to watch it for the first time, if they're separated from all the complaining, they come away saying, "Well, that wasn't so bad." It definitely deserves an open-minded watch-through from each fan, at the very least.