Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
- LeprikanGT
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 4:58 pm
- Location: Namek
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
I 100% agree with that.
That would be like cutting the first part of an episode because it happened at the end of the previous episode. Example being Gohan going SS2 twice.
That would be like cutting the first part of an episode because it happened at the end of the previous episode. Example being Gohan going SS2 twice.
- Li'l Lemmy
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:21 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
For me, I honestly couldn't care less about the flow of the episodes. Whether Kuririn summons Shenlong twice in a row or not doesn't matter to me. What I care about is getting all the material as it was originally presented. If the eyecatches were a part of the show, then I want 'em without having to go picking through YouTube for a few seconds' worth of animation. Included, I can fast-forward through the damn things if I'm in that much of a hurry, but I can't make them suddenly appear on the disc if they weren't included and I want them.
~Da Lemmy
~Da Lemmy
The NUMBER ONE Goten fan, and a fucking epic one at that.Goten of Japan wrote:Don't go 9... Go 10! (Go-ten. Goten. Get it? DOOD.)
-
MajinVejitaXV
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
Annnnnd this is the point. No one suffers from additional footage being included, but those of us who wanna watch the show in as close a manner as possible to the original broadcast would miss out by removing chunks that some might deem 'insignificant.' It's an argument that's gone on since the first DVD was released, reaching its apex with the 'lawl is only hands and feet' outcry of the widescreen debate.Li'l Lemmy wrote:Included, I can fast-forward through the damn things if I'm in that much of a hurry, but I can't make them suddenly appear on the disc if they weren't included and I want them.
"You don't know what you're talking about. You're not very smart, and the things you're saying are nonsense. And I'm not angry. But you do need to shut up." - Tycho Brahe
- LeprikanGT
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 4:58 pm
- Location: Namek
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
@Lemmy: I would want every single thing that was from the original.
Along with that, ALL the extra footage like the real dragonbox got with commercials and all that fun stuff.
Along with that, ALL the extra footage like the real dragonbox got with commercials and all that fun stuff.
- Li'l Lemmy
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:21 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
It's the bottom line, pure and simple. For me, at least. I ain't usually the sort to shut out the other side in an argument, but in this case I don't see how anyone could succeed with the opposing viewpoint. Why should only part of the fanbase get what they want by having the eyecatches omitted when instead it's a win-win for everyone by giving individuals the choice to either embrace or ignore them by including the darned things?MajinVejitaXV wrote:Annnnnd this is the point. No one suffers from additional footage being included, but those of us who wanna watch the show in as close a manner as possible to the original broadcast would miss out by removing chunks that some might deem 'insignificant.' It's an argument that's gone on since the first DVD was released, reaching its apex with the 'lawl is only hands and feet' outcry of the widescreen debate.Li'l Lemmy wrote:Included, I can fast-forward through the damn things if I'm in that much of a hurry, but I can't make them suddenly appear on the disc if they weren't included and I want them.
It's not even so much a matter of including them, because "including" makes it sound like FUNimation should have a choice. If I want to be a prick, I can just say that the eyecatches are mandatory simply because they were there to begin with. Their inclusion is not optional if the release is to be done correctly.
~Da Lemmy
The NUMBER ONE Goten fan, and a fucking epic one at that.Goten of Japan wrote:Don't go 9... Go 10! (Go-ten. Goten. Get it? DOOD.)
-
MajinVejitaXV
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
I could understand someone asking for a playback option that skips them, along with recaps and so on, but omitting them completely just because of your preference seems selfish. Besides, if I'm paying for something, why the hell would I want less material?Li'l Lemmy wrote:It's the bottom line, pure and simple. For me, at least. I ain't usually the sort to shut out the other side in an argument, but in this case I don't see how anyone could succeed with the opposing viewpoint.
"You don't know what you're talking about. You're not very smart, and the things you're saying are nonsense. And I'm not angry. But you do need to shut up." - Tycho Brahe
- Li'l Lemmy
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:21 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
Fine, fine. Let there be a Skip option. Just so long as the darned things are still accessible otherwise. ^_~
~Da Lemmy
~Da Lemmy
The NUMBER ONE Goten fan, and a fucking epic one at that.Goten of Japan wrote:Don't go 9... Go 10! (Go-ten. Goten. Get it? DOOD.)
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
I'm okay with eyecatches. The original Dragon Ball's are kind of bland, but I've always really liked the first set for Dragon Ball Z that the opening post mentions. Catchy song, nice animation. Seems a bit out of place during the Cell Saga when Gohan's twice the age of what the eyecatch depicts, but during the Saiyan Saga eyecatches are just part of the experience.
I agree with Rocketman that commercial breaks can seriously ruin the flow of a movie, but eyecatches are brief enough that they don't take me out of the story, so from there it's just a matter of whether I like the eyecatches in question, and I do for all of them past the first series.
I agree with Rocketman that commercial breaks can seriously ruin the flow of a movie, but eyecatches are brief enough that they don't take me out of the story, so from there it's just a matter of whether I like the eyecatches in question, and I do for all of them past the first series.
Princess Snake avatars courtesy of Kunzait, Chibi Goku avatar from Velasa.
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
For the same reason you don't want a rock in your sandwich. Yes, it's more material, but it's completely unnecessary, totally unrelated, and it breaks your teeth/the mood.Besides, if I'm paying for something, why the hell would I want less material?
-
MajinVejitaXV
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
Says you. I find rocks in my sandwich add the necessary amount of grit I need in my diet. Besides, I have teeth made of tungsten steel.Rocketman wrote:For the same reason you don't want a rock in your sandwich. Yes, it's more material, but it's completely unnecessary, totally unrelated, and it breaks your teeth/the mood.Besides, if I'm paying for something, why the hell would I want less material?
"You don't know what you're talking about. You're not very smart, and the things you're saying are nonsense. And I'm not angry. But you do need to shut up." - Tycho Brahe
- Li'l Lemmy
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:21 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
What's this, now? I THOUGHT THAT YOU WENT TO BED.MajinVejitaXV wrote:Says you. I find rocks in my sandwich add the necessary amount of grit I need in my diet. Besides, I have teeth made of tungsten steel.
~Da Lemmy
The NUMBER ONE Goten fan, and a fucking epic one at that.Goten of Japan wrote:Don't go 9... Go 10! (Go-ten. Goten. Get it? DOOD.)
-
MajinVejitaXV
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
Insomnia sucks. SVU and the occasional glance on here are my attempts at a cure. ;pLi'l Lemmy wrote:What's this, now? I THOUGHT THAT YOU WENT TO BED.MajinVejitaXV wrote:Says you. I find rocks in my sandwich add the necessary amount of grit I need in my diet. Besides, I have teeth made of tungsten steel.
~Da Lemmy
"You don't know what you're talking about. You're not very smart, and the things you're saying are nonsense. And I'm not angry. But you do need to shut up." - Tycho Brahe
-
Piccolo Daimaoh
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5407
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
Yeah, sort of like a "marathon mode" just without the eyecatches.Li'l Lemmy wrote:Fine, fine. Let there be a Skip option. Just so long as the darned things are still accessible otherwise. ^_~
~Da Lemmy
No, FUNimation would have to use it first for them to filter it.Li'l Lemmy wrote:Beware. You could be perceived as a dictator in saying so, and then you'll need to adjust the word filter to subjugate the massive "eyecatchers" rebellion that results from your genuine attempt to educate the fandom. Oh noes!!
~Da Lemmy
- The Tori-bot
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3228
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:00 pm
- Location: Penguin Village
- Contact:
Re: Did anyone else HATE the first set of eyecatchers for DBZ?
Please tell me your native language is French. Because if it is indeed English... tu es completement debile. Votre grenouille a mange mon dejeuner.SilverPlaqueVII wrote:Another eyecatchers for Eyecatach 1 of DBZ were multicolored those days. Think about it, Satan's children from the Saban-days were crazy back then.
New to the forum? Just want to know when you'll hit your next posting rank? Ever wondered why some users have special titles, and what they mean? The answers to all these questions and more are waiting for you in the Kanzenshuu Member Hierarchy Guide!!
"Of all the things to worry about... the Wookiee has no pants." -- Mark Hamill
"Of all the things to worry about... the Wookiee has no pants." -- Mark Hamill
Herms wrote:Really, you could translate either title either way and nobody would care. But God would know.
-
TimeCrash4
- Newbie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:32 pm
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
A good thing about the eyecatches:
When you're watching a awful episode at least when they show up you'll know you're half way through the nightmare
.
When you're watching a awful episode at least when they show up you'll know you're half way through the nightmare
- SilverPlaqueVII
- OMG CRAZY REGEN
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:19 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON (#The6)
- Contact:
Re: Did anyone else HATE the first set of eyecatchers for DBZ?
Typo, I meant to say is "Eyecatches" thanks.The Tori-bot wrote:Please tell me your native language is French. Because if it is indeed English... tu es completement debile. Votre grenouille a mange mon dejeuner.SilverPlaqueVII wrote:Another eyecatchers for Eyecatach 1 of DBZ were multicolored those days. Think about it, Satan's children from the Saban-days were crazy back then.
Jelo Gutierrez Cantos (Dr. Fresh)
I'M GONNA BREAK YOU, LIKE A KIT-KAT BAR!! - TFS Goku. (have a Break, have a Kit Kat Freeza!)
-------------------------------------
Silver Shenron • Transit Archive Projects
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facebook | X (Twitter) | Tumblr | Youtube (1) (2) | Flickr | Instagram | Threads
I'M GONNA BREAK YOU, LIKE A KIT-KAT BAR!! - TFS Goku. (have a Break, have a Kit Kat Freeza!)
-------------------------------------
Silver Shenron • Transit Archive Projects
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facebook | X (Twitter) | Tumblr | Youtube (1) (2) | Flickr | Instagram | Threads
- Gaffer Tape
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6128
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
Yeah, you're right. Let's cut out the second act repeat. And while we're at it, how about the beginning of the first act? After all, those are often just repeats of the end of the last episode. Don't need to see it twice either. We could probably just do with one version of the opening and ending on each disc because watching those just waste time and are pretty much the same. Then I suppose we could also just snip the recaps and previews as we can see the previous and next episodes. Might as well cut the title card too, as the titles are written in the accompanying book and having to watch it on the screen will just waste time. Come to think of it, the books have synopses of the episodes as well, so how about we just leave out the rest of the episodes too? After all, no need to be redundant!Taku128 wrote:And why shouldn't they cut the second scene? The only reason they repeated it was because they thought people would forget what happened during the commercial break. There are no commercials on DVDs/Blu-rays so repeating scenes is pointless. They can just include the extra take as a bonus feature.
And even with the pointless eyecatch separating the scenes you're still watching Kuririn summon Shenlong twice.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:
MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1
MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 2/16/26!)
Current Episode: The Airtight Case for Slice of Life! - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 1
- MCDaveG
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5762
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:54 pm
- Location: Prague, Czechia
- Contact:
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
I don't take a notice of them, it doesn't ruin any drama moment for me. I don't know what's the big deal?
For me it's simmilar to one of those reasons, why some people hate subtitles, because when they are reading, they don't see part of the picture:D
+ Imagine you are in Japan, and after this funny eycatcher comes advertisement for Coca Cola, Mc Donald, new game on SNES, some toys, VHS's, cinema trailer, sp............................................. and after ten minutes, next eycatcher.
I think that the drama already died
It seems to me like some next excuse of Funi fans, because originally, Z run in USA was without eyecatchers.
I love them because they leting me know, that you're in half of the episode.
For me it's simmilar to one of those reasons, why some people hate subtitles, because when they are reading, they don't see part of the picture:D
+ Imagine you are in Japan, and after this funny eycatcher comes advertisement for Coca Cola, Mc Donald, new game on SNES, some toys, VHS's, cinema trailer, sp............................................. and after ten minutes, next eycatcher.
I think that the drama already died
It seems to me like some next excuse of Funi fans, because originally, Z run in USA was without eyecatchers.
I love them because they leting me know, that you're in half of the episode.
FighterZ, Street Fighter 6, Mortal Kombat: Funky_Strudel
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.
- VegettoEX
- Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: Did anyone else HATE the first set of eyecatchers for DBZ?
He's not talking about your "typo".SilverPlaqueVII wrote:Typo, I meant to say is "Eyecatches" thanks.The Tori-bot wrote:Please tell me your native language is French. Because if it is indeed English... tu es completement debile. Votre grenouille a mange mon dejeuner.SilverPlaqueVII wrote:Another eyecatchers for Eyecatach 1 of DBZ were multicolored those days. Think about it, Satan's children from the Saban-days were crazy back then.
He's talking about the fact that 99% of your posts make no sense to English speakers. You have been told time and time again. We have even asked you if English is one of your primary languages, but you either don't answer the question, or mysteriously disappear when asked. Of course, the problem is that if you don't understand English all that well, you don't understand what it is we are telling you.
People are actually starting to believe that you are nothing more than your everyday Internet troll looking for some laughs. I'm pretty sure you are just an incredibly young kid that has no sense of Internet etiquette (the copy-and-paste slaps from other websites on your own), a poor grasp on the English language (every forum post you make), and a desire to be accepted and seen as an equal (your incredibly awkward-and-incorrect posts regarding the Japanese language and translations).
I will type this in very simple English under the assumption that you do not speak the language all that well, but do understand it to some degree (call it dismissive and patronizing if you want, but nothing else seems to work):
You are very young. Your English is very, very bad. Many things that you say are wrong. People are laughing at you. They are bad people for being mean, but you make it very easy for them.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::
Re: Eyecatches and the distraction/interruption factor
And then everyone can come on here and refuse to buy FUNi's release of it because they don't like the font they used to type it upGaffer Tape wrote:Yeah, you're right. Let's cut out the second act repeat. And while we're at it, how about the beginning of the first act? After all, those are often just repeats of the end of the last episode. Don't need to see it twice either. We could probably just do with one version of the opening and ending on each disc because watching those just waste time and are pretty much the same. Then I suppose we could also just snip the recaps and previews as we can see the previous and next episodes. Might as well cut the title card too, as the titles are written in the accompanying book and having to watch it on the screen will just waste time. Come to think of it, the books have synopses of the episodes as well, so how about we just leave out the rest of the episodes too? After all, no need to be redundant!Taku128 wrote:And why shouldn't they cut the second scene? The only reason they repeated it was because they thought people would forget what happened during the commercial break. There are no commercials on DVDs/Blu-rays so repeating scenes is pointless. They can just include the extra take as a bonus feature.
And even with the pointless eyecatch separating the scenes you're still watching Kuririn summon Shenlong twice.





