Why #16 was a failure
Re: Why #16 was a failure
Story-wise we had tips of how strong No.16 would be.
-
Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Why #16 was a failure
Not really. Like I said, his power was a mystery before his battle with Cell. Prior to that, the most we had was "stronger than the Super Saiyans", like #17 and #18. There's nothing that suggested he was stronger than #17 and #18, nor anything that suggested he wasn't.Fox666 wrote:Story-wise we had tips of how strong No.16 would be.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: Why #16 was a failure
Actually there was
Of course No.17 replied that his power is greater than No.16, however No.17 is arrogant and I suppose Dr. Gero knows what he is talking about.Strength Checker wrote:Chapter: 350 (DBZ 156), P6.4-6
Context: as No.17 and No.18 muck around with No.16
No.20: “Yo-you can’t! Stop! Do you want to destroy the world?! No.16 is an experimental model, a failed creation! Don’t move him, whatever you do! [...] I had planned on fixing him soon…! Anyway, don’t move him! It might mean the end for you and me!”
-
Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Why #16 was a failure
Well, just that, then.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.