Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
FindKenshi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by FindKenshi » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:30 pm

I believe PAndrews once informed me that the writer behind the Paikon saga, is the same guy who wrote for the early story arcs of DBGT. He has a belief that Goku grows incredibly powerful not only just by fighting, but by watching others fight. I think there may be a line of dialog Paikon has during the tournament, that Goku has increased his skills incredibly after every match in the tournament.

cyberlord34
Banned
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:40 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by cyberlord34 » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:32 pm

FindKenshi wrote:I believe PAndrews once informed me that the writer behind the Paikon saga, is the same guy who wrote for the early story arcs of DBGT. He has a belief that Goku grows incredibly powerful not only just by fighting, but by watching others fight. I think there may be a line of dialog Paikon has during the tournament, that Goku has increased his skills incredibly after every match in the tournament.
First off, where's the proof behind these claims? I don't see any. A character can't simply grow stronger by watching a fight, that's ridiculous.

User avatar
FindKenshi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by FindKenshi » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:34 pm

I don't have access to those episodes, but I was told that Paikon indeed states such. If he does, there would be your proof. If he doesn't, then I was misinformed.

User avatar
Perfect
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1865
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:16 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Perfect » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:38 pm

I don't recall anything stated like that. I think I remember something like, he's been letting him on with his powers and abilities, but I could be wrong.
Fox666 wrote:It seems you have pissed a lot of people on this forum, and I am quite sure they would like to call you stupid and say that's the designated adjectives for you. But they don't do that because of there are rules in this community.

User avatar
lash
Regular
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 1:07 am
Location: Georgia, US

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by lash » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:39 pm

Perfect wrote:I've stated several times it is subjective, and makes perfect sense based on the numerical mechanics I provided beforehand. From the first point onward I was addressing it in the same mannerism you were, a subjective nature. Paikuhan's attack > Cell's maximum is no more subjective than Cell's maximum > Paikuhan's attack.
Not quite.
The difference is the evidence supporting it. Even one factual line sways the probability.

As I said as far back as page 4, "Paikuhan's attack > Cell entirely" has the fact that Kaio's statements show he wasn't surprised that Paikuhan defeated Cell. At first, you tried to deem it a plothole, but eventually came to realization that it obviously isn't.

I don't see any in-anime line or guidebook representation supporting "Cell's maximum > Paikuhan's attack". Not one. Which is the very reason why I consider it silly.
-Otherwise known as The God of DBG.

User avatar
FindKenshi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by FindKenshi » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:40 pm

Perfect wrote:I don't recall anything stated like that. I think I remember something like, he's been letting him on with his powers and abilities, but I could be wrong.
I believe it was PAndrews who told me this, on GameFAQs. He said during or after the fight when Goku is against the Aqua guy, Paikon mentions something about how Goku is already much more powerful now than he was before the tournament began.

User avatar
paperbowser
Newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:44 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by paperbowser » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:41 pm

yeah it's something along the lines of Pikkon being surprised that goku hasnt been going all out

User avatar
Perfect
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1865
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:16 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Perfect » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:43 pm

lash wrote:
Perfect wrote:I've stated several times it is subjective, and makes perfect sense based on the numerical mechanics I provided beforehand. From the first point onward I was addressing it in the same mannerism you were, a subjective nature. Paikuhan's attack > Cell's maximum is no more subjective than Cell's maximum > Paikuhan's attack.
Not quite.
The difference is the evidence supporting it. Even one factual line sways the probability.

As I said as far back as page 4, "Paikuhan's attack > Cell entirely" has the fact that Kaio's statements show he wasn't surprised that Paikuhan defeated Cell. At first, you tried to deem it a plothole, but eventually came to realization that it obviously isn't.

I don't see any in-anime line or guidebook representation supporting "Cell's maximum > Paikuhan's attack". Not one. Which is the very reason why I consider it silly.
The difference is Kaio's line that you're referring to here? It can also be a plot hole depending on how you interpret it, so it's not "obvious", I'm sure other people have made that mistake.

Kaio being surprised could be attributed to a lot of factors, having nothing to do with his attack. It could simply be because he's stating that Pikkon's smarter and faster, who knows; it's open heavily to interpretation.

There's plenty of lines and things not in guidebooks, if we see an alien whose race isn't mentioned, does that mean the alien's race does not exist? Nothing in the guidebooks/anime either state that his attack was greater than his entire power, just that he was defeated. It's pretty subjective to believe Cell's max was stronger or that Pikkon's attack was stronger.

@FindKenshi
If anyone wants to confirm this, that'd be great.
Fox666 wrote:It seems you have pissed a lot of people on this forum, and I am quite sure they would like to call you stupid and say that's the designated adjectives for you. But they don't do that because of there are rules in this community.

User avatar
lash
Regular
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 1:07 am
Location: Georgia, US

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by lash » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:57 pm

Perfect wrote:Kaio being surprised could be attributed to a lot of factors, having nothing to do with his attack. It could simply be because he's stating that Paikuhan's smarter and faster, who knows; it's open heavily to interpretation.

There's plenty of lines and things not in guidebooks, if we see an alien whose race isn't mentioned, does that mean the alien's race does not exist? Nothing in the guidebooks/anime either state that his attack was greater than his entire power, just that he was defeated. It's pretty subjective to believe Cell's max was stronger or that Paikuhan's attack was stronger.
Kaio wasn't surprised.

Your argument is equivalent to saying that just because it's not stated Gregory isn't a mutated cabbage patch kid, doesn't mean he isn't. And that since nothing in the manga says he 'isn't' a mutated cabbage patch kid it is just as subjective to think he is one compared to if he wasn't one. It's a pretty bad fallacy you're hovering around. If you have no evidence, you're making unfounded claims.
-Otherwise known as The God of DBG.

User avatar
Perfect
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1865
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:16 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Perfect » Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:01 am

My apologies, I meant not surprised.

No I'm afraid that's not the same. Because there's still the possibility of Cell's maximum > Pikkon's attack and Pikkon's attack > Cell's maximum. Neither is stated, but both are possible. Hell you wouldn't even need subjective material to prove he isn't one, you'd just need an out of universe explanation, and one could accumulate millions (I bet I could prove he isn't one with an in universe explanation as well). I'm making no more "unfounded" claims than you. The only thing that's set in stone was Pikkon winning, nothing else. Yours theory of the mechanics on this situation are as valid as mine and therefore as subjective.
Last edited by Perfect on Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fox666 wrote:It seems you have pissed a lot of people on this forum, and I am quite sure they would like to call you stupid and say that's the designated adjectives for you. But they don't do that because of there are rules in this community.

User avatar
paperbowser
Newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:44 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by paperbowser » Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:08 am

How is calling him a mutated whatever even possible? I mean that's just... I can't even come up with a term for it. Both of what you said is possible about Cell, but that isn't. That's where the lines drawn, I find it to be fairly irrelevant to even bring that up. What a fallacy.

User avatar
DNA
I Live Here
Posts: 4236
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:23 pm

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by DNA » Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:43 pm

My honest opinion after watching the arc was that Paikuhan was at the time the most powerful being in the After Life. He easily defeats Cell, despite the fact that you, Perfect, don't want to admit; and he was destroying Goku. The only reason Goku won was because he lured Paikuhan to a false sense of security and outsmarted him, not because he was stronger of even on par. Goku even admitted he was going to lose. And honestly? I would have preferred if Goku had lost, like in the earlier Tenkaichi Budokais. Goku would have lost against a more powerful person than him and this would motivate him to train further. The way the filler puts it, Goku beat Paikuhan and continued training out of boredom.

As a final note, I repeat, the way I saw it, at the time, Paikuhan was the strongest being in the whole After Life.

User avatar
Perfect
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1865
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:16 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Perfect » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:01 am

I've already admitted he lost, that was never the issue here. In fact it was about his attack.
Last edited by Perfect on Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Fox666 wrote:It seems you have pissed a lot of people on this forum, and I am quite sure they would like to call you stupid and say that's the designated adjectives for you. But they don't do that because of there are rules in this community.

User avatar
paperbowser
Newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:44 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by paperbowser » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:06 am

My honest opinion after watching the arc was that Paikuhan was at the time the most powerful being in the After Life. He easily defeats Cell, despite the fact that you, Perfect, don't want to admit; and he was destroying Goku. The only reason Goku won was because he lured Paikuhan to a false sense of security and outsmarted him, not because he was stronger of even on par. Goku even admitted he was going to lose. And honestly? I would have preferred if Goku had lost, like in the earlier Tenkaichi Budokais. Goku would have lost against a more powerful person than him and this would motivate him to train further. The way the filler puts it, Goku beat Paikuhan and continued training out of boredom.

As a final note, I repeat, the way I saw it, at the time, Paikuhan was the strongest being in the whole After Life.
and i repeat hes not

User avatar
DNA
I Live Here
Posts: 4236
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:23 pm

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by DNA » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:36 am

Perfect, I'm sorry, I just didn't read through the immense wall's of text you and others have posted, but fair enough. And paperbowser, what? Just because you say so?

I stated my opinion not just by watching Paikuhan bitch slap Cell around, but by watching the entire arc. Again, I refuse to read wall's of text to check on everyone's opinions on the matter but honestly, what the arc seems to present is that Paikuhan towers over everyone else in terms of power and skill. He was so confident he was about to win that Goku managed to outsmart him in the last moment. He was confident because he knows no one in the After Life can come close to his raw power. At least this is the way I interpreted the arc, it just seemed logical to me.

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:44 pm

DNA wrote:My honest opinion after watching the arc was that Paikuhan was at the time the most powerful being in the After Life. He easily defeats Cell, despite the fact that you, Perfect, don't want to admit; and he was destroying Goku. The only reason Goku won was because he lured Paikuhan to a false sense of security and outsmarted him, not because he was stronger of even on par. Goku even admitted he was going to lose. And honestly? I would have preferred if Goku had lost, like in the earlier Tenkaichi Budokais. Goku would have lost against a more powerful person than him and this would motivate him to train further. The way the filler puts it, Goku beat Paikuhan and continued training out of boredom.
They both technically lose, don't they? Because at the end of the match, the Dai Kaiou tells them that they both touched the upper ceiling simultaneously, resulting in a draw. And then, I think, there was something about the Dai Kaiou offering to train them for a hundred years, but they declined. I don't think that the filler made out that Gokuu was stronger than Paikuhan and/or that he just continued training out of boredom. Paikuhan still appeared multiple times afterward, and Gokuu's always motivated to push his limits (which is why he attained SS3).

I will give Toei credit for actually introducing characters that could give Gokuu some trouble (which is the entire reason why he wanted to remain in the afterlife: to check out if there were better challenges there), as opposed to the manga, where he says that there wasn't anybody on par with him in the afterlife. But perhaps that was a better lead into him deciding to take Oob under his wing to see if he could sate his boredom.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

User avatar
DNA
I Live Here
Posts: 4236
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:23 pm

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by DNA » Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:55 pm

The fact that they were disqualified due to a technicality is irrelevant. And they didn't decline Dai Kaio's offer, he came up with the disqualification because he didn't want to be embarrassed by the fact that both Goku and Paikuhan had long surpassed his power level.

Yes, they don't imply Goku is stronger than Paikuhan, like I explained before, but I still think it would be more fair if Paikuhan had won.

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:11 pm

DNA wrote:The fact that they were disqualified due to a technicality is irrelevant. And they didn't decline Dai Kaio's offer, he came up with the disqualification because he didn't want to be embarrassed by the fact that both Goku and Paikuhan had long surpassed his power level.

Yes, they don't imply Goku is stronger than Paikuhan, like I explained before, but I still think it would be more fair if Paikuhan had won.
Yeah, that's true. I suppose it was just more of Toei's Gokuu-wanking.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

User avatar
DNA
I Live Here
Posts: 4236
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:23 pm

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by DNA » Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:47 pm

Piccolo Daimao wrote:Yeah, that's true. I suppose it was just more of Toei's Gokuu-wanking.
Well, yeah, it clearly was. Goku had no right to win that battle, he only won because Paikuhan got cocky and distracted somehow. I always prefer the Goku that doesn't always win but grows stronger from his loses.

User avatar
Piccolo Daimao
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am

Re: Paikuhan & Cell debate thread

Post by Piccolo Daimao » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:51 pm

DNA wrote:
Piccolo Daimao wrote:Yeah, that's true. I suppose it was just more of Toei's Gokuu-wanking.
Well, yeah, it clearly was. Goku had no right to win that battle, he only won because Paikuhan got cocky and distracted somehow. I always prefer the Goku that doesn't always win but grows stronger from his loses.
Same here.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.

Locked