Yes, because Piccolo (who, at the time, wasn't referring to himself as Piccolo anymore) told him so and Cell had no reason to believe otherwise, especially with his increased strength and the possibility that, like #16, he sensed something else within him or an entirely new ki that "proved" it.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Or was he? He met Piccolo, Piccolo said that he is not Piccolo (because he had merged with Kami), and Cell believed him and had no idea he was a Namekian!Piccolo Daimao wrote:No, he's not that dumb.
How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
He had the face of Piccolo and he clearly was a Namekian. Cell had his cells, and he couldn't recognize his face & race?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Yes, because Piccolo (who, at the time, wasn't referring to himself as Piccolo anymore) told him so and Cell had no reason to believe otherwise
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Why should sharing his cells allow him to recognise him?DBZGTKOSDH wrote:He had the face of Piccolo and he clearly was a Namekian. Cell had his cells, and he couldn't recognize his face & race?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Yes, because Piccolo (who, at the time, wasn't referring to himself as Piccolo anymore) told him so and Cell had no reason to believe otherwise
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Because, according to Dragon Ball biology, if someone has the cells of another person, he has their memories, techniques and power. Just look at Cell or Bio-Broli.Fin wrote:Why should sharing his cells allow him to recognise him?
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
For some reason I was thinking that Toriyama's writing suggested a distinction between having their memories and knowing their techniques, but after a quick skim of the first scene with Cell I see that his recognition of Kurilin was implied to come as a result of his lineage. (Or if you don't interpret the scene that way, it suggests that Cell viewed some of Gero's footage of the group, so he should know Piccolo from there.)
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
When he powered up against #17, #16 immediately piped up, "That's not Piccolo!" Presumably, his ki's now completely different from both Piccolo and God. Also, you know, Piccolo flat-out says that he's not Piccolo, and why would he lie?DBZGTKOSDH wrote:He had the face of Piccolo and he clearly was a Namekian. Cell had his cells, and he couldn't recognize his face & race?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Yes, because Piccolo (who, at the time, wasn't referring to himself as Piccolo anymore) told him so and Cell had no reason to believe otherwise
Besides, Dr. Gero never tracked them beyond Namek, so the only Namekian that Cell would've "seen" is Piccolo himself. But anyway, I don't think he had no idea that he was a Namekian, since he later admits his goof of forgetting that Piccolo could regenerate, or letting his arrogance get the better of him when Piccolo, after having the energy sucked out of his arm, dupes him into telling his backstory.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
I don't think it's a question of being dumb. How's he meant to know how time travel works when nobody's ever explained it to him?Piccolo Daimao wrote:No, he's not that dumb.
I think the manga's a lot vaguer about whether he has their memories and techniques or not. The only technique he ever uses in the manga is the Kamehameha which, let's be honest, isn't hard to learn at that point. All of his knowledge could have been given to him by the same computer that told him about #17 and #18. But that said, it is pretty likely that Toriyama just intended him to have their memories; it's a pretty standard trope.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Because, according to Dragon Ball biology, if someone has the cells of another person, he has their memories, techniques and power. Just look at Cell or Bio-Broli.Fin wrote:Why should sharing his cells allow him to recognise him?
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
- Kendamu
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6998
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
- Location: The Martial Arts World
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
The plot holes in Dragonball can easily be summed up as hiccups in the timeline caused by time travel. 

Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
At least the Daizenshuu says this: Because he was created from the genetic information of the Earth's major warriors, he acquired their individual abilities.Bussani wrote:I think the manga's a lot vaguer about whether he has their memories and techniques or not. The only technique he ever uses in the manga is the Kamehameha which, let's be honest, isn't hard to learn at that point. All of his knowledge could have been given to him by the same computer that told him about #17 and #18. But that said, it is pretty likely that Toriyama just intended him to have their memories; it's a pretty standard trope.
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Doesn't take a genius to know even the simplest of things. I can't be bothered to explain it now; it's so obvious.Bussani wrote:I don't think it's a question of being dumb. How's he meant to know how time travel works when nobody's ever explained it to him?Piccolo Daimao wrote:No, he's not that dumb.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
It's not obvious to me. How is it a simple thing? You wouldn't know time travel works the way it does in Dragon Ball if the story never told you. Especially not when Trunks himself had said before, "Don't tell my parents or I might not be born!"Piccolo Daimao wrote:Doesn't take a genius to know even the simplest of things. I can't be bothered to explain it now; it's so obvious.
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
I wouldn't want to not be born in the past I traveled to neither.Bussani wrote:Especially not when Trunks himself had said before, "Don't tell my parents or I might not be born!"
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
That's fair enough, but we're using that as an explanation for the line after how the time travel actually works was explained. If you were reading it for the first time, you wouldn't assume, "Well, time travel must make an alternate timeline that doesn't replace the original, so Trunks actually means this," would you? It's not something that's obvious. It could work Back to the Future style for all a first time reader knows, which has nothing to do with being dumb or smart.hleV wrote:I wouldn't want to not be born in the past I traveled to neither.Bussani wrote:Especially not when Trunks himself had said before, "Don't tell my parents or I might not be born!"
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
- Nex Carnifex
- Banned
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:26 pm
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
What about Piccolo's finger beam which he used to bust Gohan's shoulder?Bussani wrote:I don't think it's a question of being dumb. How's he meant to know how time travel works when nobody's ever explained it to him?Piccolo Daimao wrote:No, he's not that dumb.
I think the manga's a lot vaguer about whether he has their memories and techniques or not. The only technique he ever uses in the manga is the Kamehameha which, let's be honest, isn't hard to learn at that point. All of his knowledge could have been given to him by the same computer that told him about #17 and #18. But that said, it is pretty likely that Toriyama just intended him to have their memories; it's a pretty standard trope.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Because, according to Dragon Ball biology, if someone has the cells of another person, he has their memories, techniques and power. Just look at Cell or Bio-Broli.Fin wrote:Why should sharing his cells allow him to recognise him?
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
How could he mistake the unborn Cell in another timeline to literally be his already born self grown-up? Yeah, Cell doesn't know everything about time travel; that's why he was initially confused how Trunks was alive in that timeline, before deducing that he must've travelled back in the time machine. But this should be elementary.Bussani wrote:It's not obvious to me. How is it a simple thing? You wouldn't know time travel works the way it does in Dragon Ball if the story never told you. Especially not when Trunks himself had said before, "Don't tell my parents or I might not be born!"Piccolo Daimao wrote:Doesn't take a genius to know even the simplest of things. I can't be bothered to explain it now; it's so obvious.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Piccolo's finger beam? Isn't it just a generic ki blast from the fingertips?Nex Carnifex wrote:What about Piccolo's finger beam which he used to bust Gohan's shoulder?
Oh, there is one other technique he uses in the manga, though: Taiyo-ken. But when Piccolo questions him knowing it, Kuririn says, "Well, it's easy to do. Goku and I have both copied it."
Because he wouldn't know it was "another timeline"? No one told him, and it's not something that's obvious to assume. After all, in the majority of time travel fiction out there, the you in the past would be you. I'm sure most people reading Dragon Ball for the first time assumed the same up until Trunks explained how it worked.Piccolo Daimao wrote:How could he mistake the unborn Cell in another timeline to literally be his already born self grown-up?
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
- DoomieDoomie911
- OMG CRAZY REGEN
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 2:12 pm
- Location: United States
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
I used to do the same thing, but just let it go. There's going to be plot holes in every series.
She/her (I have a Twitter account now.)Cipher wrote:Dragon Ball is the story of a kind-hearted, excitable child who uses the power of friendship to improve those around him as he grows into a dangerous obsessive who sometimes accidentally saves the world.
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Maybe it might not have been another timeline, but he still got into a time machine and headed to the past, where his past self would still be growing and his present self would be the activated one. He was merely referring to the other Cell that would be completed in 24 years, since he himself was already completed (unless, how would he be activated to travel back anyway?).Bussani wrote:Because he wouldn't know it was "another timeline"? No one told him, and it's not something that's obvious to assume. After all, in the majority of time travel fiction out there, the you in the past would be you. I'm sure most people reading Dragon Ball for the first time assumed the same up until Trunks explained how it worked.Piccolo Daimao wrote:How could he mistake the unborn Cell in another timeline to literally be his already born self grown-up?
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Well of course he's referring to the Cell that's still growing. I didn't mean to imply that he wasn't. It's a weird case of tense caused by time travel. Normally when talking about your past self you'd say something like, "I wouldn't be completed for twenty years after that," but since Cell is in the past he can get away with saying, "I won't be completed for another twenty years."
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: How do you explain plot holes within Dragon Ball?
Ah, OK. We're on the same page now.Bussani wrote:Well of course he's referring to the Cell that's still growing. I didn't mean to imply that he wasn't. It's a weird case of tense caused by time travel. Normally when talking about your past self you'd say something like, "I wouldn't be completed for twenty years after that," but since Cell is in the past he can get away with saying, "I won't be completed for another twenty years."
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.