You had to resort to what a Guide for the series says to actually try to explain the situation in detail without using a personal interpretation like you were using before, and yet you still claim that there is no plothole within the manga... Doesn't that tell you something?Saiga wrote:Daizenshuu 7 states that Kaioshin's technique is what allowed him to hold Gohan, and (indirectly) says it is more powerful than Chiaotzu's. So it's the power of the technique that matters, and Majin Boo is far stronger than Gohan so the technique isn't powerful enough for him. You have yet to prove there is a plot hole... there is only one if you assume South Kaioshin was stronger than Gohan, which is never implied in the manga.rereboy wrote:
![]()
If that power or ability isn't dependent on strength, then why didn't Kaioshin use it on Buu? Wouldn't it work? By the way, wouldn't Chaotzu be able to immobilize SSJ2 Gohan as well then? If it does have a relation with strength, just how strong does the opponent have to be to resist it? Is it Ki related, maybe its some form of Kiai? Or is it truly magic, like babididi uses? Or is it a mental ability like telekinesis? If it can be resisted, can it be resisted with ki power alone, or is it necessary primarily mental power? Or does it require magic? Would Kaioshin be able to immobilize Gohan for long or did it only work because Gohan was caught off guard and was only on effect for a second or two? Etc.
Sure, there isn't a plothole... when you add your personal interpretation to all those events to explain them properly. Without it, those questions, and many others regarding South Kaioshin and the sword pop up.
As I've quoted, a plothole also exist when there is a blatant omission of relevant information. And if people feel that its necessary to come up with very different ways of explaining certains things in the manga, since your interpretation is not the only one that exists and makes sense, then there is a blatant omission of relevant information to explain it.
Just ask yourself, why are there so many theories and interpretations regarding Dragon Ball, especially in the Buu saga, including regarding the Z sword and Soth Kaioshin? Is is because there is no plothole and you are the only one smart enough to read the manga and see the truth written there? Or is it because there is a blatant omission of relevant information to explain certain things in the manga and people automatically come up with interpretations to make sense of it, which themselves vary greatly since the lack of information allows for very different interpretations? I think that the answer to these questions can only be one.
Some authors actually want people to come up with their own conclusions, generally in more adult works. They leave things to the reader's interpretation. These are deliberate plotholes, a tool used by many authors which requires precise handling so that is used only on things that don't really require an detailed explanation and, on the contrary, the plot and story benefit from leaving those elements unexplained or left mysterious. This isn't the case with Dragon Ball, however, since the story doesn't benefit from these plotholes at all. It pretty much just bothers the reader.
Anyway, I can't be more clear than this regarding the matter. Of all the things that allow different interpretations in the manga, I don't think that the very existence of these plotholes is something that rightfully allows for different interpretations.
There is a difference between unexplained events and a contradiction of the plot. There are a lot of theories about things that weren't explicitly laid out but that doesn't mean every one of them is a plot hole. The fact is there is nothing in the manga suggesting that Kaioshin is stronger than Gohan and should be able to pull the Z Sword out.
Anyway, if you had read my post carefully, you have noticed that I've already stated that many authors deliberately leave things unexplained, in what we might call deliberate plotholes.
Like I said, this is a tool that has to be carefully used since the things that are left unexplained should contribute positively to the story. The story should actually benefit from leaving that aspect unexplained and mysterious and the average reader should feel that its not necessary to explain those things in the story at all.
So, in short, there is nothing wrong with these type of plotholes since, when they are correctly used, they even make the story better.
Such is not the case in Dragon Ball. Someone who reads the Buu saga and actually thinks about the story will almost certainly wonder how could there be such an apparent insignificant difference in power between the weakest Kaioshin and the strongest since the weakest was able to hold SSJ2 Gohan immobilized for a few seconds and is stated to be much stronger than Piccolo (who, in the previous saga, was not that far from the power of the saiyans in their SSJ1) while the strongest was not able to remove a sword that Gohan, without visibly becoming a SSJ2, was able to remove, but, on the other hand, Kid Buu chose to absorb him (South Kaioshin), and no other Kaioshin besides him and Dai Kaioshin, when Buu had only been shown at that point to choose to absorb someone out of necessity, and the form that Buu took after absorbing him, is implied to be stronger than Super Buu, which all seems to imply that there was a very important difference in power between him and the weakest Kaioshin.
A reader paying attention to the story will be left scratching his head at all this before coming up with a way of interpreting it that makes sense to him. And that is what constitutes a blatant lack of relevant information who actually bothers the reader and makes him feel and wish that this was better explained in the manga, and, without any further explanations in the manga, the reader is forced to come up with his personal way of interpreting it that actively tries to make sense of it.
I love Dragon Ball and its author but I won't pretend to be blind to its flaws and plotholes. I don't love it any less for it.




