Yeah, as well as the fact that, on Namek, he needed them to help him defeat Freeza. He had no qualms about actually killing them; it's just that he never got the chance to.DBZAOTA482 wrote:Didn't he nearly get crippled and was incapable of fighting?Fox666 wrote:Raditz is much worse than Vegeta. Sure Vegeta was evil, but he spared the lifes of Kuririn or Gohan. Raditz came looking for Goku because he wanted the assistance of another warrior, he asked for the head of a hundred humans and was willing to kill Goku in the end. Nappa is the kindiest to the three. He tought of Vegeta as a true friend and the death of the Saibaimen bothered him.
Raditz a good guy ?
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
I've always considered Vegeta the most evil of the Saiyans, so I can see Raditz redempting himself one way or another.
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
I think Fox is talking about when he spared their lives on Namek because he was in a good mood. Remember? Right before Gohan stole his Dragon Ball and made him make this face:

Of course, I'm not sure we could say he spared them out of the goodness of his heart. He just didn't think he needed to kill them.

Of course, I'm not sure we could say he spared them out of the goodness of his heart. He just didn't think he needed to kill them.
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
- Fionordequester
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Huh, you know, I forgot about that actually...hmm...
Yeah but...even so, it still would've been perfectly in-character for Vegeta to kill Gohan simply out of spite for what he and Goku did to him on Earth, so actually, that still kind of counts as "out of the goodness of his heart".Of course, I'm not sure we could say he spared them out of the goodness of his heart. He just didn't think he needed to kill them.
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
He also let Ginyu-Frog live, now that I think about it.
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Because he thought living as a frog for the rest of his life would be a fate worse than death. He was going to kill Ginyuu until Gokuu cut in and said that there'd be no point, since he couldn't do anything then.Bussani wrote:He also let Ginyu-Frog live, now that I think about it.
But even if Vegeta spared Kuririn and Blooma once he'd obtained what he thought was his last Dragon Ball, he still told Gohan that he was going to return to Earth and kill everyone on it. That would include Gokuu (who he was annoyed at for surpassing and defeating him anyway), Gohan, Kuririn and Blooma.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Yeah, Nappa is so kind... despite, you know, killing hundreds of people as soon as he arrives on Earth. Just for fun.Fox666 wrote:Raditz is much worse than Vegeta. Sure Vegeta was evil, but he spared the lifes of Kuririn or Gohan. Raditz came looking for Goku because he wanted the assistance of another warrior, he asked for the head of a hundred humans and was willing to kill Goku in the end. Nappa is the kindiest to the three. He tought of Vegeta as a true friend and the death of the Saibaimen bothered him.
Raditz came to Earth on Vegeta's orders. The plan was to have Raditz recruit Goku, presumably by any means possible. Raditz wanted Goku to prove he's a real Saiyan menace.
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Of course Nappa is still a space pirate. But he is better than Raditz or Vegeta.Toadster wrote:Yeah, Nappa is so kind... despite, you know, killing hundreds of people as soon as he arrives on Earth. Just for fun.
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
I don't see how he's better than Raditz.Fox666 wrote:Of course Nappa is still a space pirate. But he is better than Raditz or Vegeta.Toadster wrote:Yeah, Nappa is so kind... despite, you know, killing hundreds of people as soon as he arrives on Earth. Just for fun.
SAD 4 U
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
I see Nappa and Raditz about the same, except Raditz is still a hotblooded young gun while Nappa is older and has settled down a lot.
Of course, this is relative to the Saiyan culture, not ours.
Of course, this is relative to the Saiyan culture, not ours.
- LiamKav
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 5:15 pm
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Arguing about who is the less evil of a trio of people who have murder counts in the thousands (at the absolute very least) is... well, not fun exactly, but...
I'll get back to you.
I'll get back to you.
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Well, Nappa's a member of the Saiyan nobility (and, I'm not sure if this was an anime/dub-only line, but he mentioned that he was "the second strongest Saiyan"), so he could be more arrogant than Raditz.Rocketman wrote:I see Nappa and Raditz about the same, except Raditz is still a hotblooded young gun while Nappa is older and has settled down a lot.
Of course, this is relative to the Saiyan culture, not ours.
But yeah, I think that they were about the same too.
Only Vegeta you can say with certainty was the most evil, since he didn't seem to have any loyalty for his comrades and killed Nappa, who at least suggested that they revive Raditz with the DBs, even if he was, to both of them, nothing more than a weakling who deserved to be killed by trusting too much in his scouter.LiamKav wrote:Arguing about who is the less evil of a trio of people who have murder counts in the thousands (at the absolute very least) is... well, not fun exactly, but...
I'll get back to you.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
- LiamKav
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 5:15 pm
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Okay, the problem here is that "evilness" is not a measurable quantity. So saying someone is the "most evil" is just one person's opinion over another. Let's say that at that point in his life, Vegeta had killed 10 million people, but Raditz had killed 20 million as he'd been to more high density planets. Does that make him twice as evil? What about if the people Vegeta had killed had been nicer? Or pregnant?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Only Vegeta you can say with certainty was the most evil, since he didn't seem to have any loyalty for his comrades and killed Nappa, who at least suggested that they revive Raditz with the DBs, even if he was, to both of them, nothing more than a weakling who deserved to be killed by trusting too much in his scouter.
If we're using "loyalty to comrades" as a tool to calculate the relative evil power-level of mass murderers, we might as well be saying that Nappa was less evil because he bought Raditz a birthday present once.
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
Relative to a race of ruthless space warriors, that would actually count as good. xDLiamKav wrote:If we're using "loyalty to comrades" as a tool to calculate the relative evil power-level of mass murderers, we might as well be saying that Nappa was less evil because he bought Raditz a birthday present once.
Ok, let's put it this way. They weren't good, we can't agree on that; but of them all, who had the most redeeming qualities?
Raditz though of nothing of killing earthlings because, frankly, that was his job description for most of his life. Is someone working in the slaughter house evil? It's irrelevant for him. He didn't exactly had the best influence either, aka:Vegeta.
He did want to bring Kakarot with him and wasn't going to kill Gohan... maybe.
Nappa suggested to return Raditz to life, he was their comrade after all.
Nappa was annoyed because of the Saibaman.
Nappa thought Vegeta was his friend.
I can't think of a redeeming quality of Vegeta until after a while in Namek.
He agreed not to kill Bulma and Krillin because he was in a good mood and then just because they had a terrible enemy to face off.
And look at Bardock and Co.! They actually "cared" for each other in some level. If Vegeta could be turned, I don't see why Raditz and Nappa wouldn't have at least some chance to turn too.
Check out Journey's End, a short story of Goku and Vegeta's final days. "Time is running out for the last two Saiyans"
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: Raditz a good guy ?
I guess it's, as soulnova said, more about redeeming qualities, and the way one thinks about things, that sums out how "evil" someone is. Even if Raditz had killed more people than Vegeta (which is plausible, considering that Raditz's probably older than Vegeta), Vegeta literally doesn't care about anyone but himself. Both Raditz and Nappa at least had loyalty to their comrades (for the former, Raditz gave his brother multiple chances to join him and mentioning not wanting to kill his nephew, and for the latter, Nappa actually cared about a bunch of grunts like the Saibaimen dying).LiamKav wrote:Okay, the problem here is that "evilness" is not a measurable quantity. So saying someone is the "most evil" is just one person's opinion over another. Let's say that at that point in his life, Vegeta had killed 10 million people, but Raditz had killed 20 million as he'd been to more high density planets. Does that make him twice as evil? What about if the people Vegeta had killed had been nicer? Or pregnant?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Only Vegeta you can say with certainty was the most evil, since he didn't seem to have any loyalty for his comrades and killed Nappa, who at least suggested that they revive Raditz with the DBs, even if he was, to both of them, nothing more than a weakling who deserved to be killed by trusting too much in his scouter.
If we're using "loyalty to comrades" as a tool to calculate the relative evil power-level of mass murderers, we might as well be saying that Nappa was less evil because he bought Raditz a birthday present once.
So yeah, "loyalty" is a "good" character trait, which at least says something about a race comprised of heartless killers. But because Vegeta didn't seem to have any of that "loyalty" and was constantly touted as being an exceptional bastard even among his own race, he's more evil than them.
Before his "Earth indoctrination", the only time Vegeta ever did something "good" for anyone other than himself was not killing Gohan, Kuririn and Blooma on Namek, and even then, it's more likely that he thought he might need their help to defeat Freeza. And he mentioned that he was going to return to Earth and kill everyone on it anyway.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.








