jjgp1112 wrote:I don't understand why you keep using "Well we will end up with a happy moment with Goku and Gohan at the end" to justify having Trunks' mission for trying to rescue the timeline not have any payoff. There's no point in a "dark and grizzly" ending if it doesn't actually resolve anything. No story is complete without a resolution unless there's a sequel that does resolve it. I'd wager that Gohan being all by himself with no father or friends and basically being in the same position as Future Trunks after he takes care of the Androids in his timeline is the farthest thing from what Trunks wanted, as well as for the younger version of himself to grow up without a father.
I'm pretty sure that nobody wanted Goku to die, but he still died in the main story. The reason why nobody had that much of a problem with it (minus Chi-Chi) was because Earth was still in peace and in good hands. My idea has something similar with most of the Z Force dying, but Earth still being in peace and in good care. If Trunks saw that his dead friends were comfortable being dead and that Earth was safe with Gohan, he'd have no problem.
I simply disagree. "Man, we're weak. Our lives are meaningless, so we're going to stay dead too," is hard for me to see. Especially if Gohan's then going to beat himself up over it to the point that he doesn't wish his arm back. Let's just leave the 9-11 year old one armed kid by himself--he's strong, he'll be okay.
Agree to disagree, then? It's really not that hard to see them going with the flow and wishing to stay dead, at least IMO. And they wouldn't know the emotional toll it will have on Gohan, hence why they find out in a following arc and cheer him up.
It's bad writing practice to make something logical/possible not happen simply because you think it gives the story a stronger mood. It's kind of similar to how an author might make someone act out-of-character just because they want to advance the plot in a certain direction.
If they're already dead, it's best that they stay dead. Most of them had outlived their usefulness (Krillin, Tien, Yamcha) or wouldn't have had a problem staying dead (Goku and most likely Piccolo and Vegeta, the latter of which is probably headed straight to Hell) anyway. Bringing out the Namekian Dragonballs at that point would be random and stupid, but that's just IMO I guess. I don't think it's bad writing practice, and I'm sure Toriyama has avoided logical things happening because he thought it'd kill a mood.
And, yes, there's that too. There are certain expectations in storytelling, based on genre, style, etc. If something is set up, it has to be delivered upon. If the entire setup for a story arc is that a man comes back to the past so that he can stop the gloomy future he lives in in which everyone important has died, the audience expects that that goal will be accomplished. Just like a story arc where the goal is to find new Dragon Balls to wish their dead friends back to life... ends with them finding new Dragon Balls to wish their dead friends back to life. From the moment that Cell announces that he has to absorb #17 and #18 to become complete, you KNOW that Cell will not be defeated before he obtains that goal. There is just no possible way. It's the Law of Conservation of Detail at work: there's no point in establishing it if it's not going to be followed through upon.
I think it can be a serious flaw when everything turns out just as the reader expected. That would unsurprising and sometimes unexciting. And yeah, I don't see how my idea goes against that point since Earth is still saved and in Gohan's care.
The world's greatest.