RandomGuy96 wrote:
No he wasn't. At least, that one panel in the manga didn't explicitly show him in space.

Seems pretty "spacey" to me.
RandomGuy96 wrote:
No he wasn't. At least, that one panel in the manga didn't explicitly show him in space.

Master Turbo did a great scientific examination of that scene and all the other scenes of the series near the vacuum of space.rereboy wrote:http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9v3h ... o1_400.jpgRandomGuy96 wrote:
No he wasn't. At least, that one panel in the manga didn't explicitly show him in space.
Seems pretty "spacey" to me.
Since we have no idea how far he is from the planet and how wide are the different atmospheric layers of planet Vegeta, there is also no reason to believe he is in the planet Vegeta's equivalent of the Earth stratosphere.SSj_Rambo wrote:Master Turbo did a great scientific examination of that scene and all the other scenes of the series near the vacuum of space.rereboy wrote:http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9v3h ... o1_400.jpgRandomGuy96 wrote:
No he wasn't. At least, that one panel in the manga didn't explicitly show him in space.
Seems pretty "spacey" to me.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtop ... =7&t=22104
And I have to agree, it doesn't explicitly show that he is in space, nor is there reason to believe he could be.
in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space#BoundaryThere is no clear boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space, as the density of the atmosphere gradually decreases as the altitude increases. There are several standard boundary designations, namely:
The Fédération Aéronautique Internationale has established the Kármán line at an altitude of 100 km (62 mi) as a working definition for the boundary between aeronautics and astronautics. This is used because at an altitude of roughly 100 km (62 mi), as Theodore von Kármán calculated, a vehicle would have to travel faster than orbital velocity in order to derive sufficient aerodynamic lift from the atmosphere to support itself.[51]
The United States designates people who travel above an altitude of 50 miles (80 km) as astronauts.[52]
NASA's mission control uses 76 mi (122 km) as their re-entry altitude (termed the Entry Interface), which roughly marks the boundary where atmospheric drag becomes noticeable (depending on the ballistic coefficient of the vehicle), thus leading shuttles to switch from steering with thrusters to maneuvering with air surfaces.[53]
In 2009, scientists at the University of Calgary reported detailed measurements with an instrument called the Supra-Thermal Ion Imager (an instrument that measures the direction and speed of ions), which allowed them to establish a boundary at 118 km (73 mi) above Earth. The boundary represents the midpoint of a gradual transition over tens of kilometers from the relatively gentle winds of the Earth's atmosphere to the more violent flows of charged particles in space, which can reach speeds well over 268 m/s (600 mph)
........what.ShinRogafuken wrote:I think the anime is canon and the manga isn't.
MY HOLY GRAIL (110% Serious. Please sell me one)Mayuri Kurotsuchi wrote:"In this world, nothing perfect exists. It may be a cliche after all but it's the way things are. That's precisely why ordinary men pursue the concept of perfection, it's infatuation. But ultimately I have to ask myself "What is the true meaning of being perfect?" and the answer I came up with was nothing. Not one thing. The truth of the matter is I despise perfection! If something is truly perfect, that's IT! The bottom line becomes there is no room for imagination! No space for intelligence or ability or improvement! Do you understand? To men of science like us, perfection is a dead end, a condition of hopelessness. Always strive to be better than anything that came before you but not perfect! Scientist's agonize over the attempt to achieve perfection! That's the kind of creatures we are! We take joy in trying to exceed our grasp, in trying to reach for something that in the end, we have to admit may in fact be unreachable!"
I don't see how you can say such nonsense. There's no such thing as impossible in a fictional story, especially one like Dragon Ball. What do you even mean by "not canon"? That it's impossible for it to exist in the main timeline, or as an alternate timeline, or both? Whether you like it or not, DBGT is set after 5 years of DB/Z, with plotholes or without, and whatever plotholes you're talking about don't make it impossible for that to be true. Do they raise questions? They may, but they're not unanswerable questions. I can easily say that Enma Daio got bored one day and decided that people in Hell can keep their bodies, and it's a valid possibility, and it's just one.Hellspawn28 wrote:I don't see how anyone can view GT canon to the manga? There is way too many plot holes in GT that can have it fit in the manga given that the Super 17 saga makes it impossible to happen in the manga.
The only thing in GT that contradicts the manga is the fact that the villains have their bodies in Hell, instead of getting reincarnated, and the fact that when they were killed for a second time, the died again instead of getting erased from existence.Hellspawn28 wrote:I don't see how anyone can view GT canon to the manga? There is way too many plot holes in GT that can have it fit in the manga given that the Super 17 saga makes it impossible to happen in the manga.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
The manga has it's own continuity. Stuff in GT can't really fit into the manga continuity. GT could be view as canon to the anime, but there are something in GT that makes it stand out on it's own. In GT, we find out from Bebi the Saiya-jin were not originally from Planet Plant even though King Kai in the filler flash back episode of DBZ said that they both live on the same planet together. Also Cell and Freeza are immortal in Hell when Goku said that Vegeta would be erase forever if he died again against Buu.Dorexx wrote:That it's impossible for it to exist in the main timeline, or as an alternate timeline
That's just stupid. I think saying "Enma Daio got bored one day and decided that people in Hell can keep their bodies" is a stupid reason on why people in Hell can keep their bodies in Hell. It's like saying that Batman was able to return journey to Gotham so quick after being stuck on the other side of the world in TDKR because he is BatmanDorexx wrote:I can easily say that Enma Daio got bored one day and decided that people in Hell can keep their bodies, and it's a valid possibility, and it's just one.
This is basically what I consider canon too.dbzfan7 wrote:My personal canon is the manga, Jump special (because BOG mentions tarble), and Battle of Gods. I also count the Father of Goku special, and Trunks manga. Everything else I ignore.
Gh... Oh my... Do you have any sort of imagination at all?Hellspawn28 wrote:The manga has it's own continuity. Stuff in GT can't really fit into the manga continuity. GT could be view as canon to the anime, but there are something in GT that makes it stand out on it's own. In GT, we find out from Bebi the Saiya-jin were not originally from Planet Plant even though King Kai in the filler flash back episode of DBZ said that they both live on the same planet together. Also Cell and Freeza are immortal in Hell when Goku said that Vegeta would be erase forever if he died again against Buu.Dorexx wrote:That it's impossible for it to exist in the main timeline, or as an alternate timeline
That's just stupid. I think saying "Enma Daio got bored one day and decided that people in Hell can keep their bodies" is a stupid reason on why people in Hell can keep their bodies in Hell. It's like saying that Batman was able to return journey to Gotham so quick after being stuck on the other side of the world in TDKR because he is BatmanDorexx wrote:I can easily say that Enma Daio got bored one day and decided that people in Hell can keep their bodies, and it's a valid possibility, and it's just one.. Also in GT we got Bebi as a Mutant Tsufurujin which is a race that is never shown in the manga. They were never mention in the manga which means that they most likely don't exist. The Shadow Dragon Saga also can't happen if there is Super 17 saga since the hole between Hell and Earth help break the negative energy inside the Dragon Balls.
Guide books only help establish manga info. I consider them part of the manga set up.Saiyan Prince Vegeta wrote:Oh yeah, I forgot about the Guidebooks!I'm too lazy to list stuff.
This is how you play tennis without the net. The fact that you can run yourself around through minor loopholes does not make for a good argument in your favor. Example: Goku was just barely able to dodge a planet as a baby when his Saiyan ship was on the way to Earth. This is a perfect example that is not falsifiable and therefore weak by definition. Could it be true? Absolutely, there's nothing that I know of that says otherwise and if there is I can give you another example on the spot. I cannot disprove the existence of the Easter Bunny but I don't give equal footing to the idea that it's real. Likewise I can't prove that all the knocks on the head in movie 1 caused Kuririn to forget that he met Gohan but it's completely unfalsifiable so how can you possibly give something like this merit?Dorexx wrote:The thing I said about Enma Daio isn't the only explanation, but it's a possible one; we can think of dozens, even hundreds of more reasons. The point is that it's not impossible to explain it.
I think I see evidence for the contrary in this thread.Zephyr wrote:I don't think anyone here is trying to say that two alternate versions of the same thing are compatible.